ImageImageImage

Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST)

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

IceManBK1
Analyst
Posts: 3,232
And1: 330
Joined: Jul 14, 2017
   

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#601 » by IceManBK1 » Fri Sep 3, 2021 2:58 am

Wolves21 wrote:The best offer I would give them is Beasley/McDaniels/Prince and 2 1st round picks.That's it,and yes I would rather keep Beverly then trade him in any deal with the 76ers.

Russell
Edwards
Simmons
Towns

Those 4 together should be more then enough to be a playoff team out WEST and if healthy should be a top 4 seed in the WEST as well.


the thing about trading both Prince and McDaniels is we won't have a SF after that. We could sign avery bradley or wesley mathews to 1 yr vet min deals. or maybe start Patrick Beverly at SG and move Edwards to SF since he just grew 2 inches. So he has good height and size to play SF now. I'm in for the Beasley/McDaniels/Prince+2 first rder package though. Don't wanna wait til oct when beverly is eligble to be traded. Even though Beverly is 33 yrs old. He can still play defense at a high lvl and shoot the 3. So he would be perfect fit at SG. Or like i said, sign bradley or mathews and even bismack biyombo to 1 yr deals.

Dlo/Beverly
Edwards/Novell/Okogie
Avery Bradley or Mathews/Layman
Simmons/Vanderbilt
Towns/Reid

Or
Dlo/Bolmaro
Beverly/Novell/Okogie
Edwards/Layman
Simmons/Vanderbilt
Towns/Reid
NYSixersFan
Analyst
Posts: 3,334
And1: 1,794
Joined: May 21, 2014
       

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#602 » by NYSixersFan » Fri Sep 3, 2021 2:58 am

Wolves21 wrote:The best offer I would give them is Beasley/McDaniels/Prince and 2 1st round picks.That's it,and yes I would rather keep Beverly then trade him in any deal with the 76ers.

Russell
Edwards
Simmons
Towns

Those 4 together should be more then enough to be a playoff team out WEST and if healthy should be a top 4 seed in the WEST as well.


I'd look for better, but I'd make this deal if I could flip the pick/young players for an established player
SO_MONEY
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,799
And1: 1,032
Joined: Sep 11, 2009
         

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#603 » by SO_MONEY » Fri Sep 3, 2021 2:58 am

Nick K wrote:
Calinks wrote:PErsonally, I think Dlo, Beasley, and McDaniels would be greatly beneficial to Philly right now. Maybe not what they are looking for in a return but all three of those guys would be a big help.

Jaden can play good defense and be an everyman type right now. Probably low stats but he can make an impact. Beasley's shooting would be fantastic for them, knock down three's, willingness to take shots, and he plays with energy. I think a good defensive team like Philly, he could be a positive on defense when he has a lot of competence around him.

Dlo is a lot of what Simmons isn't. Dlo is not a good defender but he can create and get shots at any time. He won't hesitate to take big shots and I just don't know how you would stop Philly if they Dlo+Beasley and their other guys on the floor. Clogging the pain would be a nightmare as the shooting would be way too good from the perimeter. They would be a hard team to stop.


Let me get thhis straight. You want to give up 20 pts a night with Dlo, 15 pts a night with Beasley and 10 pts or more from McD. That's 45 pts and we get back 14. I don't see us as a stronger team. Look at the depth we lose for a guy who can't shoot. Shooting is the most important skill in the game today. How great would Steph and Durant be if they couldn't shoot?

We get back a very good defender and a guy who can drive to the basket. It just doesn't seem fair to me.

At this point nobody is going to change anyones mind. i almost wish it were over so we could talk about something else.

Wouldn't it be great if there was a strong consensus to get the guy? When half the people here argue against that should be telling.

I've always said I'd like the guy without giving up the core of Dlo, McD, Ant or Kat. Philly is in a very bad negotiating position and it's getting worse. They know it and so does Rosas. I trust him to make the right call. I can walk from this deal very easily.


Yup, some people want to actually give things up to become worse, it is baffling to say the least.
NYSixersFan
Analyst
Posts: 3,334
And1: 1,794
Joined: May 21, 2014
       

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#604 » by NYSixersFan » Fri Sep 3, 2021 3:01 am

IceManBK1 wrote:
Wolves21 wrote:The best offer I would give them is Beasley/McDaniels/Prince and 2 1st round picks.That's it,and yes I would rather keep Beverly then trade him in any deal with the 76ers.

Russell
Edwards
Simmons
Towns

Those 4 together should be more then enough to be a playoff team out WEST and if healthy should be a top 4 seed in the WEST as well.


the thing about trading both Prince and McDaniels is we won't have a SF after that. We could sign avery bradley or wesley mathews to 1 yr vet min deals. or maybe start Patrick Beverly at SG and move Edwards to SF since he just grew 2 inches. So he has good height and size to play SF now. I'm in for the Beasley/McDaniels/Prince+2 first rder package though. Don't wanna wait til oct when beverly is eligble to be traded. Even though Beverly is 33 yrs old. He can still play defense at a high lvl and shoot the 3. So he would be perfect fit at SG. Or like i said, sign bradley or mathews and even bismack biyombo to 1 yr deals.

Dlo/Beverly
Edwards/Novell/Okogie
Avery Bradley or Mathews/Layman
Simmons/Vanderbilt
Towns/Reid

Or
Dlo/Bolmaro
Beverly/Novell/Okogie
Edwards/Layman
Simmons/Vanderbilt
Towns/Reid



If you got Simmons; he would play SF
IceManBK1
Analyst
Posts: 3,232
And1: 330
Joined: Jul 14, 2017
   

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#605 » by IceManBK1 » Fri Sep 3, 2021 3:01 am

It'd be nice if we can land thad young for okogie+Layman.

Dlo
Edwards
Young
Simmons
Towns
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 23,161
And1: 6,301
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#606 » by KGdaBom » Fri Sep 3, 2021 3:03 am

NYSixersFan wrote:Would you do....

Simmons for Beasley, Beverly or Prince plus 3 1st round pick...unprotected

Beasley and Prince plus one unprotected pick? yes I would roll the dice on the protected pick not being a top 3 and biting us in the a$$.
Not 3. I would be willing to do two lightly protected picks along with Beasley and Prince.
IceManBK1
Analyst
Posts: 3,232
And1: 330
Joined: Jul 14, 2017
   

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#607 » by IceManBK1 » Fri Sep 3, 2021 3:03 am

NYSixersFan wrote:
IceManBK1 wrote:
Wolves21 wrote:The best offer I would give them is Beasley/McDaniels/Prince and 2 1st round picks.That's it,and yes I would rather keep Beverly then trade him in any deal with the 76ers.

Russell
Edwards
Simmons
Towns

Those 4 together should be more then enough to be a playoff team out WEST and if healthy should be a top 4 seed in the WEST as well.


the thing about trading both Prince and McDaniels is we won't have a SF after that. We could sign avery bradley or wesley mathews to 1 yr vet min deals. or maybe start Patrick Beverly at SG and move Edwards to SF since he just grew 2 inches. So he has good height and size to play SF now. I'm in for the Beasley/McDaniels/Prince+2 first rder package though. Don't wanna wait til oct when beverly is eligble to be traded. Even though Beverly is 33 yrs old. He can still play defense at a high lvl and shoot the 3. So he would be perfect fit at SG. Or like i said, sign bradley or mathews and even bismack biyombo to 1 yr deals.

Dlo/Beverly
Edwards/Novell/Okogie
Avery Bradley or Mathews/Layman
Simmons/Vanderbilt
Towns/Reid

Or
Dlo/Bolmaro
Beverly/Novell/Okogie
Edwards/Layman
Simmons/Vanderbilt
Towns/Reid



If you got Simmons; he would play SF


Then who plays PF? I'm not too thrilled with starting both Simmons and Vanderbilt. Unless one of them is able to consistently knock down catch and shoot 3s.
jpatrick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,737
And1: 1,959
Joined: May 30, 2007
 

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#608 » by jpatrick » Fri Sep 3, 2021 4:39 am

KGdaBom wrote:
NYSixersFan wrote:Would you do....

Simmons for Beasley, Beverly or Prince plus 3 1st round pick...unprotected

Beasley and Prince plus one unprotected pick? yes I would roll the dice on the protected pick not being a top 3 and biting us in the a$$.
Not 3. I would be willing to do two lightly protected picks along with Beasley and Prince.


I’d do Beasley, Prince, and the three firsts. I’d try to get at least some protection. Maybe top four.

But the fact we keep both DLo AND McDaniels, I might do top 2-3 protected. Maybe one, the earliest, unprotected.
theGreatRC
RealGM
Posts: 18,530
And1: 4,992
Joined: Oct 12, 2006
Location: California
 

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#609 » by theGreatRC » Fri Sep 3, 2021 5:00 am

jpatrick wrote:
KGdaBom wrote:
NYSixersFan wrote:Would you do....

Simmons for Beasley, Beverly or Prince plus 3 1st round pick...unprotected

Beasley and Prince plus one unprotected pick? yes I would roll the dice on the protected pick not being a top 3 and biting us in the a$$.
Not 3. I would be willing to do two lightly protected picks along with Beasley and Prince.


I’d do Beasley, Prince, and the three firsts. I’d try to get at least some protection. Maybe top four.

But the fact we keep both DLo AND McDaniels, I might do top 2-3 protected. Maybe one, the earliest, unprotected.


I'd do Beasley, Prince and 3 1sts as well
Dysfunctional Wolves fan
Nick K
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,784
And1: 2,394
Joined: Nov 23, 2016
       

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#610 » by Nick K » Fri Sep 3, 2021 5:36 am

KGdaBom wrote:
Nick K wrote:
TheProdigy wrote:Shrink makes many good points here. What exactly did he say that you perceive as condescending?


I agree wth shrink. He makes very good points and I see nothing condescending whatsoever.

Since you are anti Simmons of course you agree with Shrink. He didn't make any point in that post whatsoever. When he says I'm not a person who wants Simmons here to me that was condescending to those who do.


Do you read? I'm not anti Simmons. I'm anti over paying to get him! You throw players and picks out there like drunken sailors. I'm all for getting Simmons if we don't give up our core. That includes McD. Although, if it came down to it, I'd go Beasley, Prince, and A protected pick. That's it!!

I'd could give up Beverly, Beasley, Prince and a protected 1st. We'll see.

I'm not anti Ben!

I could be wrong but I stand by stating McD being as good if not better overall player than Simmons in 3 years. This kid oozes talent. Let the 19 year old grow up. We'll see.
Folklore
Pro Prospect
Posts: 856
And1: 253
Joined: Jun 13, 2017
 

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#611 » by Folklore » Fri Sep 3, 2021 8:24 am

SO_MONEY wrote:
Nick K wrote:
Calinks wrote:PErsonally, I think Dlo, Beasley, and McDaniels would be greatly beneficial to Philly right now. Maybe not what they are looking for in a return but all three of those guys would be a big help.

Jaden can play good defense and be an everyman type right now. Probably low stats but he can make an impact. Beasley's shooting would be fantastic for them, knock down three's, willingness to take shots, and he plays with energy. I think a good defensive team like Philly, he could be a positive on defense when he has a lot of competence around him.

Dlo is a lot of what Simmons isn't. Dlo is not a good defender but he can create and get shots at any time. He won't hesitate to take big shots and I just don't know how you would stop Philly if they Dlo+Beasley and their other guys on the floor. Clogging the pain would be a nightmare as the shooting would be way too good from the perimeter. They would be a hard team to stop.


Let me get thhis straight. You want to give up 20 pts a night with Dlo, 15 pts a night with Beasley and 10 pts or more from McD. That's 45 pts and we get back 14. I don't see us as a stronger team. Look at the depth we lose for a guy who can't shoot. Shooting is the most important skill in the game today. How great would Steph and Durant be if they couldn't shoot?

We get back a very good defender and a guy who can drive to the basket. It just doesn't seem fair to me.

At this point nobody is going to change anyones mind. i almost wish it were over so we could talk about something else.

Wouldn't it be great if there was a strong consensus to get the guy? When half the people here argue against that should be telling.

I've always said I'd like the guy without giving up the core of Dlo, McD, Ant or Kat. Philly is in a very bad negotiating position and it's getting worse. They know it and so does Rosas. I trust him to make the right call. I can walk from this deal very easily.


Yup, some people want to actually give things up to become worse, it is baffling to say the least.


It's funny, Ben will come here and play like rookie Rubio. I can still hear Karl yelling at Rubio to "shoot the ball". Rubio come back and actually has a shot now, wow.

He gets traded. And now we want to to trade away three scorers because we somehow forgot how bad t was to have a guy on the team that cant shoot.

And also that players don't get faster when they get older. Are we to expect ben to get faster than Jaden as he gets older? how about shooting? In two seasons will Jaden bring more to a team than Ben? I could argue that with all of Bens turnovers and lack of shooting Jaden s a better player for the team. Without the spacing Ant will have a hard time getting to the rim. if we ha to win at the line we'd be screwed.

The only trade I'd make for Ben is Prince, Bev and a protected 1st that becomes a second. From Philly I'd want a second back too
Folklore
Pro Prospect
Posts: 856
And1: 253
Joined: Jun 13, 2017
 

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#612 » by Folklore » Fri Sep 3, 2021 8:49 am

Calinks wrote:
Nick K wrote:
Calinks wrote:PErsonally, I think Dlo, Beasley, and McDaniels would be greatly beneficial to Philly right now. Maybe not what they are looking for in a return but all three of those guys would be a big help.

Jaden can play good defense and be an everyman type right now. Probably low stats but he can make an impact. Beasley's shooting would be fantastic for them, knock down three's, willingness to take shots, and he plays with energy. I think a good defensive team like Philly, he could be a positive on defense when he has a lot of competence around him.

Dlo is a lot of what Simmons isn't. Dlo is not a good defender but he can create and get shots at any time. He won't hesitate to take big shots and I just don't know how you would stop Philly if they Dlo+Beasley and their other guys on the floor. Clogging the pain would be a nightmare as the shooting would be way too good from the perimeter. They would be a hard team to stop.


Let me get thhis straight. You want to give up 20 pts a night with Dlo, 15 pts a night with Beasley and 10 pts or more from McD. That's 45 pts and we get back 14. I don't see us as a stronger team. Look at the depth we lose for a guy who can't shoot. Shooting is the most important skill in the game today. How great would Steph and Durant be if they couldn't shoot?

We get back a very good defender and a guy who can drive to the basket. It just doesn't seem fair to me.

At this point nobody is going to change anyones mind. i almost wish it were over so we could talk about something else.

Wouldn't it be great if there was a strong consensus to get the guy? When half the people here argue against that should be telling.

I've always said I'd like the guy without giving up the core of Dlo, McD, Ant or Kat. Philly is in a very bad negotiating position and it's getting worse. They know it and so does Rosas. I trust him to make the right call. I can walk from this deal very easily.

I'm not sure I do the trade but I would lean towards it. I do think we need to make big moves if we ever want to a contending team, I don't know if that will happen just keeping this core together. Simmons is a superstar-caliber player, he has some huge flaws but he brings a lot to the table. Its something I have to give strong consideration to.


:crazy: Why throw away our great contracts and high potential rookies for another teams trash?

Minutes 1,848 1,877
Field Goals Made 429 325
Field Goals Att 771 583
Field Goals % .556 .558
Three Points Made 83 3
Three Points % .399 .300
Free Throws Made 170 176
Free Throws Att 204 287
Free Throws % .833 .613
Rebounds 467 417
Assists 78 401
Turnovers 84 173
Steals 34 93
Blocks 63 35
Points 1,111 829

I don't think that many people think of John Collins as a "superstar-caliber player but I'd take him over master of none Simmons
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 23,161
And1: 6,301
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#613 » by KGdaBom » Fri Sep 3, 2021 9:51 am

Nick K wrote:
KGdaBom wrote:
Nick K wrote:
I agree wth shrink. He makes very good points and I see nothing condescending whatsoever.

Since you are anti Simmons of course you agree with Shrink. He didn't make any point in that post whatsoever. When he says I'm not a person who wants Simmons here to me that was condescending to those who do.


Do you read? I'm not anti Simmons. I'm anti over paying to get him! You throw players and picks out there like drunken sailors. I'm all for getting Simmons if we don't give up our core. That includes McD. Although, if it came down to it, I'd go Beasley, Prince, and A protected pick. That's it!!

I'd could give up Beverly, Beasley, Prince and a protected 1st. We'll see.

I'm not anti Ben!

I could be wrong but I stand by stating McD being as good if not better overall player than Simmons in 3 years. This kid oozes talent. Let the 19 year old grow up. We'll see.

If that's all you would give for Simmons you are comparably extremely anti-Simmons. What you are willing to offer would get you hung up on and probably your calls would never be accepted again. Don't try to say you're not anti-Simmons. You are as anti-Simmons as they come.
TwolvesFanRome
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,430
And1: 666
Joined: Aug 25, 2014
Location: Roma
   

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#614 » by TwolvesFanRome » Fri Sep 3, 2021 10:32 am

What about a Three team deal MIN PHI IND where we land Sabonis?
"...I want to compliment him, we all expected that he would take up the game, we have prepared the plan race on him, we have doubled. And, as usual, he did what he wanted..."

Zelimir Obradovic, talking about Dejan Bodiroga
Baseline81
Analyst
Posts: 3,270
And1: 1,908
Joined: Jan 18, 2009

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#615 » by Baseline81 » Fri Sep 3, 2021 11:56 am

KGdaBom wrote:If that's all you would give for Simmons you are comparably extremely anti-Simmons. What you are willing to offer would get you hung up on and probably your calls would never be accepted again. Don't try to say you're not anti-Simmons. You are as anti-Simmons as they come.

Someone that is "extremely anti-Simmons" would not want to trade for him at all.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,342
And1: 22,764
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#616 » by Klomp » Fri Sep 3, 2021 12:00 pm

Something I was just thinking about today is the benefit of the pick swap.

Normally, these are only used as a way to appease a team in trade negotiations as a way around the Stepien rule, but no real value is usually added. Houston is getting four pick swaps from Brooklyn, but does anyone expect Houston to be better than Brooklyn by 2026 to where they can use them?

However, we are in a unique position in these discussions where even with the trade, there's a real possibility that multiple pick swaps would add value because there's a decent chance Philadelphia will still be pretty good.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
jpatrick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,737
And1: 1,959
Joined: May 30, 2007
 

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#617 » by jpatrick » Fri Sep 3, 2021 12:38 pm

People are overrating scoring on here. Inflated counting stats are the worst way to judge a player. I feel like I’m making the same argument I made predraft about LaMelo when everyone was saying he was horrible.

You can’t teach Simmons’ BBIQ. He’s a low usage guy, which gives more and easier shots to those that should be taking them, especially Ant and Towns. Was Wiggins a star when he was scoring 20+ here are taking shots from Towns? No. With our scoring options, especially if Russell stays, you need guys that make are scorers life easier, not takes shots from them. We, right now, don’t have a single player that is an elite shot creator for others. A Simmons-type player, who is an elite fit with Towns, would be huge.

Plus, he’s perhaps the best defensive player in the league. How is that being ignored?

I’d love to get Simmons without giving up Russell or McDaniels. Take all the picks. I just don’t see that happening. I just hope we don’t give up both.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,708
And1: 5,202
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#618 » by minimus » Fri Sep 3, 2021 12:52 pm

TOR IN: Maxey, Reid, Beasley, Layman, Okogie, MIN one FRP top10 protected, one pick swap
ITOR OUT: FVV, Boucher

MIN IN: Simmons, Boucher
MIN OUT: Prince, Beasley, Reid, Layman, MIN three FRPs (one top10 protected, two unprotected, two pick swaps)

PHI IN: FVV, Prince, MIN two FRPs unprotected, one pick swap
PHI OUT: Simmons, Maxey

Why for TOR: they replace FVV who is in his prime with young comboguard (Maxey) and bigman who fit well next to defensive minded Siakam/Barnes/OG (Reid).
Why for PHI: FVV, Prince and picks are good combination of win-now player, expiring and picks. FVV is an excellent fit in PHI bringing both perimeter defense and clutch shooting

MIN get starting PF in Simmons. Re-sign Vando, sign veteran James Ennis, Alfonzo McKinnie

KAT/Boucher + Knight
Simmons/Vando/McKinnie
MCD/Edwards/Ennis
Edwards/Nowell/Bolmaro
DLo/Beverly + Wright
FinnTheHuman
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,552
And1: 3,719
Joined: Nov 22, 2012
   

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#619 » by FinnTheHuman » Fri Sep 3, 2021 12:58 pm

D1SGRUNTL3D wrote:
Nick K wrote:
Calinks wrote:PErsonally, I think Dlo, Beasley, and McDaniels would be greatly beneficial to Philly right now. Maybe not what they are looking for in a return but all three of those guys would be a big help.

Jaden can play good defense and be an everyman type right now. Probably low stats but he can make an impact. Beasley's shooting would be fantastic for them, knock down three's, willingness to take shots, and he plays with energy. I think a good defensive team like Philly, he could be a positive on defense when he has a lot of competence around him.

Dlo is a lot of what Simmons isn't. Dlo is not a good defender but he can create and get shots at any time. He won't hesitate to take big shots and I just don't know how you would stop Philly if they Dlo+Beasley and their other guys on the floor. Clogging the pain would be a nightmare as the shooting would be way too good from the perimeter. They would be a hard team to stop.


Let me get thhis straight. You want to give up 20 pts a night with Dlo, 15 pts a night with Beasley and 10 pts or more from McD. That's 45 pts and we get back 14. I don't see us as a stronger team. Look at the depth we lose for a guy who can't shoot. Shooting is the most important skill in the game today. How great would Steph and Durant be if they couldn't shoot?

We get back a very good defender and a guy who can drive to the basket. It just doesn't seem fair to me.

At this point nobody is going to change anyones mind. i almost wish it were over so we could talk about something else.

Wouldn't it be great if there was a strong consensus to get the guy? When half the people here argue against that should be telling.

I've always said I'd like the guy without giving up the core of Dlo, McD, Ant or Kat. Philly is in a very bad negotiating position and it's getting worse. They know it and so does Rosas. I trust him to make the right call. I can walk from this deal very easily.


This is the point I was trying to make earlier and agree wholeheartedly.


So let me get this straight, both of you think that if we send DLo back, we're gonna score 20 points less per game? Or if we send Beasley back, we're gonna score 15 points less per game? You don't understand that somebody else is simply gonna get more shots that went to DLo or Beasley and make a lot of them?

Just like when a guy I argued with claimed that Portland is gonna smoke the Nuggets in the 1st round of last playoffs, because Lillard, McCollum and Powell combined averaged like 76 ppg in the regular season, while Campazzo, Rivers who had to start in the playoffs because of injuries averaged like 15 ppg combined in the RS, completely disregarding that they had lesser roles and lesser minutes playing behind Murray, Barton, Dozier etc. And what happened? All the Nuggets guards averaged much more in the Portland series than they averaged in the RS, because they got the increased minutes and different offensive roles in the absence of Murray, Barton and Dozier, and Nuggets took Portland out in 6.

PPG is not something you just subtract or add to your scoring total to evaluate trades, PPG is caused by minutes played per game and role on offense, not simply by individual's basketball skills. Be sure that whoever gets the minutes and/or role increased if we trade depth for Simmons is gonna average more PPG on more shots, we're not losing 35 PPG while adding 14 from Simmons, it's flat out wrong to argue that, please stop.

Here's the exchange between me and that Portland guy, just found it and I'm gonna copy it here to illustrate my point:

BNM wrote:
FinnTheHuman wrote:
BNM wrote:Jokic and Porter will get theirs. They are both extremely talented offensive players. I look for a huge series from both of them. At least Nurk will make Jokic work for his. On the other end, with Murray, Barton and Dozier all expected to miss part, or all of, the series, DEN will have their hands full with Dame, C.J, and Norm (and Simons off the bench). Campazzo, Morris and Rivers are all good defenders, but between the three of them, they only average a combined 25.0 ppg. Dame, C.J. and Norm combine for 68.9 ppg. That's a huge deficit in the backcourt. Yes, MPJ will outscore Covington and Melo combined, and do so more efficiently, but Dame will also outscore Campazzo, Morris (and likely Rivers, too) combined, and do it more efficiently, as well If they blitz Dame, look for C.J. to have a huge series (as he has done in the past).


I've seen this dumb-ass argument on multiple occasions in this thread. How don't you people realize that what's dropping their averages is that guys like Morris and Campazzo played low-minute bench roles, plus playing alongside many scorers who take more ball for the most of the season? Comparing PPG the way you're comparing it is just stupid AF, these guys will average more PPG with the higher usage rates and minutes that they're gonna have.


Fine, use pts/36 and your trio if hapless scorers goes all the way up to a combined 35.9 pts/36. Lillard, McCollum and Powell average a combined 71.2 pts/36.

The point remains unchanged. DEN will struggle to get scoring from anyone other than Jokic and MPJ. And as a POR fan, I'd love to see Campazzo, Morris and Rivers all average 36 MPG for the series.


And what happened? On 30 min per game, this trio of two starters and one bench player (Campazzo, Rivers, Morris) is averaging 35.6pts. What happens if it's pts/36min then? Around 44pts/36 for that trio. And Por starting trio is averaging 72pts/39min, so what happens if that average drops to 36min? It's around 66pts/36. 44 compared to 66 doesn't look as gigantic as your initial 68.9 to 25.0 ppg, huh?

And what if we actually compare the starting PG/SG/SF's instead of 2 starters and 1 bench player vs 3 starters? Take Gordon or MPJ as the starting SF, doesn't matter. You plug in any decent player in a lineup with Jokic and give him higher usage rate in the absence of Murray, and that guy is gonna up his offensive output, it's pretty simple. So please, forget about ever using this awful brand of ppg or pts/36-based analysis without putting things into context
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,414
And1: 19,468
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Ben Simmons Thread (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#620 » by shrink » Fri Sep 3, 2021 1:11 pm

Klomp wrote:Something I was just thinking about today is the benefit of the pick swap.

Normally, these are only used as a way to appease a team in trade negotiations as a way around the Stepien rule, but no real value is usually added. Houston is getting four pick swaps from Brooklyn, but does anyone expect Houston to be better than Brooklyn by 2026 to where they can use them?

However, we are in a unique position in these discussions where even with the trade, there's a real possibility that multiple pick swaps would add value because there's a decent chance Philadelphia will still be pretty good.

I agree, and strangely, I was thinking about it yesterday too!

The greatest value in picks is in finding a true superstar, because those define franchises. While they do occasionally emerge in later picks, high level picks give a team a far far greater chance. The difference between a 3 pick and a 13 is vastly difference than 13 and 23. Now, there is certainly value in the 13. You have a better chance (still slim) at that star than 23, but you have a much better chance of finding a rotation-level player, and one that’s cheap. That has value to PHI. It also is another asset, and adding an asset has more face-saving value to Morey.

I think it’s a good, safer, asset to give away too. If MIN ends in the teens, swapping down is unlikely to cost us a franchise-level player. PHI could be a good team (let’s say pick 27?), so that’s a nice jump for them. The only issue I see is that with multiple pick swaps and traded picks in consecutive years, you have completely shut out the lottery sav8ng you for a long time. As Billy Keane knows, that has the potential to be very very bad.

Earlier, I said that right now, a reasonable deal for both sides seems to me to be

Beasley, Prince, and a 2022, and 2024 top-5 protected 1sts

I would also suggest

Beasley, Prince, a 2022 top-5 protected 1st, and 2023 and 2024 pick swaps, top-4 protected.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves