76ciology wrote:Think of the Lillard deal.
Im more confident we can get Lillard back then when everything is silent. Because if the landscape is very noisy back then, there’s gonna be some crazy team out of nowhere who’s likely going to offer everything to get Dame. I always feel that Pels can be a darkhorse player for any “win now” move, like when some people were saying they can swoop in for the Harden sweepstakes.
You have to create hype and then the people will chase the hype.
There’s no hype right now.
The moves that I theorize has hidden, short/medium/long term and angles galore at play.
I don’t pay attention to so and so is this and so and so is that.
My whole career for over decade deals with very very relatable scenarios of the why to the solution and how to a fix the problem.
Lillard is an obvious choice obviously (Championship contender)
Getting Ingram cuts out two legs with people that don’t see the angle it’s because the Pels can blow us away with Ingram alone.
Circumvent and subversion. Big time subversion
Or something as simple as getting two unprotected first from the Cavs while taking on a bad contract
is having two bullets loading a near empty gun (Ben in the chamber as we speak).
So essentially you end as the same as before with Ben or without with two bad contracts just one with less time and two premium pick assets.
Win win

.
Fox? No
CJ without Ben and Harris’s moved? It’s very close by my est.
CJ for Ben? Debatable.
Lillard? Yes
Ingram? Yes. Double win over if you can somehow get Ingram with Embiid and Ben together while moving Harris. Master stroke, I’m talking offering Maxey, Thybulle picks the whole nine yards.
Or sit tight and let things settle.
If Ben wants to strongarm the team we weren’t in a position or at trade leverage anyway. And this all could be fruitless exercise of blowing off steam of consciousness thought to pass the dreary working days. lol