Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3

Moderators: Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers

OGSactownballer
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,705
And1: 1,367
Joined: Oct 02, 2005

Re: Sixers Accept Reality w LAC 

Post#1521 » by OGSactownballer » Mon Sep 6, 2021 9:50 am

BoogieTime wrote:
clippertown wrote:I get that the Simmons situation is a tough one. In my opinion, Philly has Embid with two years on his deal and everything must be done to get him believing that the franchise has a plan, or it all falls apart when Joel leaves for nothing. The Simmons situation is unresolvable and best handled by giving him what he wants, with the goal of making the team more competitive in the next TWO years, not for the long term future. Embid is a special talent and no matter what he needs to stay a Sixer.

Since Ben is demanding a trade to just three CA teams, this puts all other teams in a complex situation. If they trade young talent for Ben and he is unhappy, then they need to deal with locker room issues - basically inheriting Philly’s problems at the sacrifice of their own future. Sending Ben to Minny for example, would cost the Wolves a fortune and they would be guaranteed to lose him for nothing in four years, which won’t be good value. Small market teams want players that want them, especially when it costs a third of the cap. They don’t want players that can’t wait to leave, harming the team culture.

If GSW want Ben, they have the best assets. Wiseman and Wiggins (plus a few picks) have the greatest value, but does it really work for either team? For GSW, they have to figure out how to win with both Draymond and Ben on the floor. They also lose their best SF with nobody to replace him but Simmons (who would be a terrible SF). For Philly, they have to pay for Wiggins who won’t move the needle and get a backup C that is also not needed. The picks don’t help now, which is the goal.

For the Clippers, they can offer Morris Sr, Kennard, Mann and Reggie should they wait till Dec 15 or replace Reggie with Bledsoe (removing Kennard) if they want to act now. Whilst this offer is not at the correct value for Ben, it does actually help Philly compete today. Morris Sr is the perfect PF to play with Embid due to his ability to spread the floor and rebound. Kennard is a specialist at spreading the floor and distributing and is only 24. Mann is a brilliant defender with solid ability to hit the 3 from the corner. Reggie can handle the PG duties and step up under pressure. Even Bledsoe can return to the Bucks and be a solid presence, if that’s what the team desires. Overall, the Sixers are better immediately and that keeps Embid happier.

The Lakers have nothing to offer.

I get that in a perfect situation, Ben is worth an all-star return but considering the numerous issues, my question is whether the Sixers would become a better team this season if they traded Ben to the Clippers - regardless of long term value.


The Kings are part of the three

And I hope where he wants to play figures into what opposing teams will offer. I also hope Rich Paul will have sway over that as well


Typical LA fan (although admittedly it’s usually Laker Fan’s that do this) conveniently forgetting two things.

First there are four California teams.

Second, there are already known reports that the Lakers are a hard no for him. The three teams are the Dubs, Mings and Clippers.

The part you missed in your statement was three pieces.

First, Joe Lacob has already been quoted since before the draft as stating that they are keeping the youth. He knows he is rammed to the stratosphere paying out the current stars. He is looking at four times the base salaries this year with repeater tax. They have no option to trade away their developmental high draft picks. They must have some controlled and cheap talent coming up. And don’t pass Wiggins off as some kind of good deal. He was just rated as one of the ten worst contracts in the NBA. PHI already has one in Harris. They aren’t taking on two and nobody else is going to take in two more years of Wiggins.

You make some good points about the Clippers, but ultimately they aren’t that string of win now pieces, rather they are just pieces and not one of them stands out. And you have no draft picks to offer.

Side note, neither the Dubs nor the Clippers picks will really have any serious value (barring some complete collapse of their stars) until at least 2026 when their stars age out and they start to fall off.

Sacramento ultimately can beat anyone if McNair wants to pay the extra in picks. We have win now guys that fit the PHI roster and know their roles already. We have food picks and own all our own so can send whatever ends up being the reasonable ask when it’s time. And finally we actually have a roster pretty much no matter how you construct the players (salary) part of the trade, that can fit Simmons and improve with him.

I also see a multi team deal becoming a stronger possibility as time ticks by to fit all the needs of the interested teams.

Finally, I believe that any other team besides these three that think it’s going. To be made to work if they get Simmons are fooling g themselves and setting up fir a world of hurt and damage if they ignore his ask to the three teams specified. They also need to keep in mind to not cross Klutch before LeBron retires or they will not get any of their clients or will be out over the same barrel as PHI right now.
MessiahUjiri
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,954
And1: 4,539
Joined: Dec 16, 2014
Contact:

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#1522 » by MessiahUjiri » Mon Sep 6, 2021 10:42 am

How about Simmons to Toronto?

Fred Van Vleet, Goran Dragic, Chris Boucher, 2021 1st (top 5 protected), 2022 2nd

for

Ben Simmons and Seth Curry



Philly gets a starting backcourt capable of 17/7 each, as well as shooting. Boucher plugs in as stretch 4 next to Embiid. Picks fill in remaining value.

Toronto embraces a positionless young roster with Simmons, Anunoby, Siakam and Barnes.
Tomjas
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,878
And1: 3,174
Joined: Nov 04, 2017

Re: Sixers Accept Reality w LAC 

Post#1523 » by Tomjas » Mon Sep 6, 2021 10:50 am

OGSactownballer wrote:
BoogieTime wrote:
clippertown wrote:I get that the Simmons situation is a tough one. In my opinion, Philly has Embid with two years on his deal and everything must be done to get him believing that the franchise has a plan, or it all falls apart when Joel leaves for nothing. The Simmons situation is unresolvable and best handled by giving him what he wants, with the goal of making the team more competitive in the next TWO years, not for the long term future. Embid is a special talent and no matter what he needs to stay a Sixer.

Since Ben is demanding a trade to just three CA teams, this puts all other teams in a complex situation. If they trade young talent for Ben and he is unhappy, then they need to deal with locker room issues - basically inheriting Philly’s problems at the sacrifice of their own future. Sending Ben to Minny for example, would cost the Wolves a fortune and they would be guaranteed to lose him for nothing in four years, which won’t be good value. Small market teams want players that want them, especially when it costs a third of the cap. They don’t want players that can’t wait to leave, harming the team culture.

If GSW want Ben, they have the best assets. Wiseman and Wiggins (plus a few picks) have the greatest value, but does it really work for either team? For GSW, they have to figure out how to win with both Draymond and Ben on the floor. They also lose their best SF with nobody to replace him but Simmons (who would be a terrible SF). For Philly, they have to pay for Wiggins who won’t move the needle and get a backup C that is also not needed. The picks don’t help now, which is the goal.

For the Clippers, they can offer Morris Sr, Kennard, Mann and Reggie should they wait till Dec 15 or replace Reggie with Bledsoe (removing Kennard) if they want to act now. Whilst this offer is not at the correct value for Ben, it does actually help Philly compete today. Morris Sr is the perfect PF to play with Embid due to his ability to spread the floor and rebound. Kennard is a specialist at spreading the floor and distributing and is only 24. Mann is a brilliant defender with solid ability to hit the 3 from the corner. Reggie can handle the PG duties and step up under pressure. Even Bledsoe can return to the Bucks and be a solid presence, if that’s what the team desires. Overall, the Sixers are better immediately and that keeps Embid happier.

The Lakers have nothing to offer.

I get that in a perfect situation, Ben is worth an all-star return but considering the numerous issues, my question is whether the Sixers would become a better team this season if they traded Ben to the Clippers - regardless of long term value.


The Kings are part of the three

And I hope where he wants to play figures into what opposing teams will offer. I also hope Rich Paul will have sway over that as well


Typical LA fan (although admittedly it’s usually Laker Dan’s that do this) conveniently forgetting two things.

First there are four California teams.

Second, there are already known reports that the Lakers are a hard no for him. The three teams are the Dubs, Mings and Clippers.

The part you missed in your statement was three pieces.

First, Joe Lacob has already been quoted since before the draft as stating that they are keeping the youth. He knows he is rammed to the stratosphere paying out the current stars. He is looking at four times the base salaries this year with repeater tax. They have no option to trade away their developmental high draft picks. They must have some controlled and cheap talent coming up. And don’t pass Wiggins off as some kind of good deal. He was just rated as one of the ten worst contracts in the NBA. PHI already has one in Harris. They aren’t taking on two and nobody else is going to take in two more years of Wiggins.

You make some good points about the Clippers, but ultimately they aren’t that string of win now pieces, rather they are just pieces and not one of them stands out. And you have no draft picks to offer.

Side note, neither the Dubs nor the Clippers picks will really have any serious value (barring some complete collapse of their stars) until at least 2026 when their stars age out and they start to fall off.

Sacramento ultimately can beat anyone if McNair wants to pay the extra in picks. We have win now guys that fit the PHI roster and know their roles already. We have food picks and own all our own so can send whatever ends up being the reasonable ask when it’s time. And finally we actually have a roster pretty much no matter how you construct the players (salary) part of the trade, that can fit Simmons and improve with him.

I also see a multi team deal becoming a stronger possibility as time ticks by to fit all the needs of the interested teams.

Finally, I believe that any other team besides these three that think it’s going. To be made to work if they get Simmons are fooling g themselves and setting up fir a world of hurt and damage if they ignore his ask to the three teams specified. They also need to keep in mind to not cross Klutch before LeBron retires or they will not get any of their clients or will be out over the same barrel as PHI right now.


No evidence that Simmons will only go to California other than a discredited report
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,622
And1: 43,867
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#1524 » by zimpy27 » Mon Sep 6, 2021 11:08 am

MessiahUjiri wrote:How about Simmons to Toronto?

Fred Van Vleet, Goran Dragic, Chris Boucher, 2021 1st (top 5 protected), 2022 2nd

for

Ben Simmons and Seth Curry



Philly gets a starting backcourt capable of 17/7 each, as well as shooting. Boucher plugs in as stretch 4 next to Embiid. Picks fill in remaining value.

Toronto embraces a positionless young roster with Simmons, Anunoby, Siakam and Barnes.


I think that's a good trade that Philly should take but I don't know how it makes sense for Raptors unless Ben plays PG?
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#1525 » by Ruzious » Mon Sep 6, 2021 12:06 pm

zimpy27 wrote:
MessiahUjiri wrote:How about Simmons to Toronto?

Fred Van Vleet, Goran Dragic, Chris Boucher, 2021 1st (top 5 protected), 2022 2nd

for

Ben Simmons and Seth Curry



Philly gets a starting backcourt capable of 17/7 each, as well as shooting. Boucher plugs in as stretch 4 next to Embiid. Picks fill in remaining value.

Toronto embraces a positionless young roster with Simmons, Anunoby, Siakam and Barnes.


I think that's a good trade that Philly should take but I don't know how it makes sense for Raptors unless Ben plays PG?

I also don't think that works for Toronto. While including Curry helps, there's not enough outside shooting to go with Simmons.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
MKWB
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,727
And1: 628
Joined: May 26, 2007
 

SGA to PHI, Simmons to MIN, Draft Haul to OKC 

Post#1526 » by MKWB » Mon Sep 6, 2021 12:22 pm

Here's a twist in the usual BS trades. How many picks would it take for OKC to trade SGA and go full-extra rebuild?

https://fanspo.com/nba/s/general/trades/DRMHijA7ywUCiP/sga-to-phi-simmons-to-min-draft-haul-to-okc

76er's trade:
Simmons
Springer
2023 1st (top-5 protected)
2024 1st pick swap

76er's recieve:
SGA
K. Williams

------------------------
T'Wolves trade:
Prince
Beverley
Okogie
2022 1st (unp.)
2023 pick swap
2024 1st (unp.)
2025 pick swap
2028 1st (top-3 prot.)

T'Wolves receive:
Simmons
Jerome

----------------------------------
Thunder trade:
SGA
Jerome
K. Williams

Thunder receive:
J. Springer
Beverley
Prince
Okogie
MIN 2022 1st (unp.)
MIN 2023 pick swap
MIN 2024 1st (unp.)
MIN 2025 pick swap
MIN 2028 1st (top-3 prot.)
PHI 2023 1st (top-5 protected)
PHI 2024 1st pick swap

76er's find a way to make the most of the BS situation, adding a few picks to get back a young star playmaker who can shoot.

Minnesota goes for the home run play, keeping their core players and instead using their most all of their future draft capital. They go with the core of D-Lo/ Edwards/ Simmons/ Towns and hope that's good enough to compete for playoffs long-term.

OKC goes full rebuild, ensuring their own picks lands near the top for the next few years. And they add a haul of future draft picks to their already booming draft collection. They can buy out Beverly and/or Prince, or keep them as stop-gap players until the trade deadline. Focus goes fully on creating a development system to maximize young players' potentials and create new stars.


KAT / Reid
Simmons/ McDaniels
Edwards/ Layman
Beasley/ Nowell
Russell/ Jerome

Embid / Drummond
Harris/ Niang / Reed
Green/ Thybulle/ Kenrich
SGA / Curry
Maxey/ Milton

Favors*/ Muscala/ Roby
Bazley/ Poku/ Robinson-Earl
Giddey/ Prince*/ Deck
Dort / Springer
Maledon/ Beverley*/ Mann

* possible trade or buyout
MessiahUjiri
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,954
And1: 4,539
Joined: Dec 16, 2014
Contact:

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#1527 » by MessiahUjiri » Mon Sep 6, 2021 12:25 pm

Ruzious wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:
MessiahUjiri wrote:How about Simmons to Toronto?

Fred Van Vleet, Goran Dragic, Chris Boucher, 2021 1st (top 5 protected), 2022 2nd

for

Ben Simmons and Seth Curry



Philly gets a starting backcourt capable of 17/7 each, as well as shooting. Boucher plugs in as stretch 4 next to Embiid. Picks fill in remaining value.

Toronto embraces a positionless young roster with Simmons, Anunoby, Siakam and Barnes.


I think that's a good trade that Philly should take but I don't know how it makes sense for Raptors unless Ben plays PG?

I also don't think that works for Toronto. While including Curry helps, there's not enough outside shooting to go with Simmons.


Simmons can certainly play PG, and they will supplement the shooting elsewhere.

The way Masai and Bobby are building, it’s likely going to be a core 4 of Simmons/Siakam/Anunoby/Scottie B, and one specialist (eg a shooter or traditional PG)


Here are 3 lineups you could play:

Simmons / Gary Trent / Anunoby / Siakam / Scottie B

Simmons / Malachi Flynn / Anunoby / Siakam / Scottie B

Simmons / Seth Curry / Anunoby / Siakam / Scottie B

Have many 6-9 two way guys, with one non-shooter on the floor. This is likely the next frontier of positionless basketball.
Godaddycurse
RealGM
Posts: 22,204
And1: 14,098
Joined: Nov 13, 2019
 

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#1528 » by Godaddycurse » Mon Sep 6, 2021 1:11 pm

OGSactownballer wrote:
Darthlukey wrote:
Godaddycurse wrote:Wall + Wood + 2022 HOU 1st + 2023 HOU 1st + 2024 BRK 1st
for
Simmons + Harris

Sengun
Harris
KPJ
Green
Simmons

Embiid
Wood
Green
Curry
Wall

Are those picks even available to be traded by Houston? I havent looked, to be fair


It cannot be their own ‘22 and ‘23. You cannot trade back to back firsts.

And I agree with the earlier comments. Houston isn’t reading any picks until somebody becomes their next star in the Harden vein. They cannot afford to after a full tank/rebuild commitment. Because ultimately the scatter shot of “get lots of firsts so you have lots of possibles” will be extremely lucky to Ian out to ONE star level player.

That means a consolidation trade if some of the rest and picks for a second star - just about three years from now.


They can trade back to back because they own MIL 2023 1st
jpatrick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,733
And1: 1,955
Joined: May 30, 2007
 

Re: SGA to PHI, Simmons to MIN, Draft Haul to OKC 

Post#1529 » by jpatrick » Mon Sep 6, 2021 1:28 pm

MKWB wrote:Here's a twist in the usual BS trades. How many picks would it take for OKC to trade SGA and go full-extra rebuild?

https://fanspo.com/nba/s/general/trades/DRMHijA7ywUCiP/sga-to-phi-simmons-to-min-draft-haul-to-okc

76er's trade:
Simmons
Springer
2023 1st (top-5 protected)
2024 1st pick swap

76er's recieve:
SGA
K. Williams

------------------------
T'Wolves trade:
Prince
Beverley
Okogie
2022 1st (unp.)
2023 pick swap
2024 1st (unp.)
2025 pick swap
2028 1st (top-3 prot.)

T'Wolves receive:
Simmons
Jerome

----------------------------------
Thunder trade:
SGA
Jerome
K. Williams

Thunder receive:
J. Springer
Beverley
Prince
Okogie
MIN 2022 1st (unp.)
MIN 2023 pick swap
MIN 2024 1st (unp.)
MIN 2025 pick swap
MIN 2028 1st (top-3 prot.)
PHI 2023 1st (top-5 protected)
PHI 2024 1st pick swap

76er's find a way to make the most of the BS situation, adding a few picks to get back a young star playmaker who can shoot.

Minnesota goes for the home run play, keeping their core players and instead using their most all of their future draft capital. They go with the core of D-Lo/ Edwards/ Simmons/ Towns and hope that's good enough to compete for playoffs long-term.

OKC goes full rebuild, ensuring their own picks lands near the top for the next few years. And they add a haul of future draft picks to their already booming draft collection. They can buy out Beverly and/or Prince, or keep them as stop-gap players until the trade deadline. Focus goes fully on creating a development system to maximize young players' potentials and create new stars.


KAT / Reid
Simmons/ McDaniels
Edwards/ Layman
Beasley/ Nowell
Russell/ Jerome

Embid / Drummond
Harris/ Niang / Reed
Green/ Thybulle/ Kenrich
SGA / Curry
Maxey/ Milton

Favors*/ Muscala/ Roby
Bazley/ Poku/ Robinson-Earl
Giddey/ Prince*/ Deck
Dort / Springer
Maledon/ Beverley*/ Mann

* possible trade or buyout


OKC isn’t trading SGA. But, as a MN fan, I do this. Allows the team to keep McDaniels and DLo, which hopefully devalues some of those picks. I do admit, a large part of our fan base would not give this much future draft capital and I’m not sure Rosas even has the authority to move future assets since we have new owners coming in.
kuclas
General Manager
Posts: 7,748
And1: 3,964
Joined: Nov 08, 2016
     

Re: SGA to PHI, Simmons to MIN, Draft Haul to OKC 

Post#1530 » by kuclas » Mon Sep 6, 2021 1:46 pm

jpatrick wrote:
MKWB wrote:Here's a twist in the usual BS trades. How many picks would it take for OKC to trade SGA and go full-extra rebuild?

https://fanspo.com/nba/s/general/trades/DRMHijA7ywUCiP/sga-to-phi-simmons-to-min-draft-haul-to-okc

76er's trade:
Simmons
Springer
2023 1st (top-5 protected)
2024 1st pick swap

76er's recieve:
SGA
K. Williams

------------------------
T'Wolves trade:
Prince
Beverley
Okogie
2022 1st (unp.)
2023 pick swap
2024 1st (unp.)
2025 pick swap
2028 1st (top-3 prot.)

T'Wolves receive:
Simmons
Jerome

----------------------------------
Thunder trade:
SGA
Jerome
K. Williams

Thunder receive:
J. Springer
Beverley
Prince
Okogie
MIN 2022 1st (unp.)
MIN 2023 pick swap
MIN 2024 1st (unp.)
MIN 2025 pick swap
MIN 2028 1st (top-3 prot.)
PHI 2023 1st (top-5 protected)
PHI 2024 1st pick swap

76er's find a way to make the most of the BS situation, adding a few picks to get back a young star playmaker who can shoot.

Minnesota goes for the home run play, keeping their core players and instead using their most all of their future draft capital. They go with the core of D-Lo/ Edwards/ Simmons/ Towns and hope that's good enough to compete for playoffs long-term.

OKC goes full rebuild, ensuring their own picks lands near the top for the next few years. And they add a haul of future draft picks to their already booming draft collection. They can buy out Beverly and/or Prince, or keep them as stop-gap players until the trade deadline. Focus goes fully on creating a development system to maximize young players' potentials and create new stars.


KAT / Reid
Simmons/ McDaniels
Edwards/ Layman
Beasley/ Nowell
Russell/ Jerome

Embid / Drummond
Harris/ Niang / Reed
Green/ Thybulle/ Kenrich
SGA / Curry
Maxey/ Milton

Favors*/ Muscala/ Roby
Bazley/ Poku/ Robinson-Earl
Giddey/ Prince*/ Deck
Dort / Springer
Maledon/ Beverley*/ Mann

* possible trade or buyout


OKC isn’t trading SGA. But, as a MN fan, I do this. Allows the team to keep McDaniels and DLo, which hopefully devalues some of those picks. I do admit, a large part of our fan base would not give this much future draft capital and I’m not sure Rosas even has the authority to move future assets since we have new owners coming in.


Considering Timberwolves core players are all 25 and under if they trade for Simmons plus under contract for many years

Outside of the 2028 protected 1st round picks. Those 2022/2024 picks likely are 15–18 range at best. And 22-28 at worst. Plus they aren’t giving up any players who are truly playable more than. 15 minutes on almost nba team
aguiar95
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,347
And1: 612
Joined: Mar 10, 2020
     

East gets even more interesting (ATL/PHI/3rd team) 

Post#1531 » by aguiar95 » Mon Sep 6, 2021 3:00 pm

Looking at the Atlanta roster, I really feel they have the most interesting, and balanced roster in the East. Having said that, I don't feel they have enough to upset BRO/MIL. With Simmons on the block, ATL is one of the few teams that could offer an interesting package to PHI (picks/prospects)

PHI choose to turn that + their own assets into a franchise ball-handler to pair with Embiid (could very well be Fox/Lillard/SGA or they could keep some of the package like Hunter/picks and go for a lesser guy in Sexton/VanVleet/Brogdon).


ATL in: Simmons.
ATL out: Gallinari, Hunter, Reddish, '22 OKC 1st (top 14 protected), '24 ATL 1st pick (unprotected), '26 ATL 1st pick (top-4 protected), rights to swap 1st rounder with ATL in '23 and '25.


PHI in: Gallinari, Hunter, Reddish, '22 OKC 1st (top 14 protected), '24 ATL 1st pick (unprotected), '26 ATL 1st pick (top-4 protected), rights to swap 1st rounder with ATL in '23 and '25.
PHI out: Simmons.


Assets that PHI could send to the 3rd team (SAC/OKC/POR):

- ATL picks;
- PHI picks;
- A colection of Maxey, Hunter, Reddish, Thybulle) + good fillers in Curry/Gallo.

Who should PHI target with all these assets? Is this enough for Simmons?
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 20,990
And1: 7,908
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#1532 » by jayjaysee » Mon Sep 6, 2021 3:52 pm

Couple thousand posts late but..

We have done deals where Sac sends Mitchell to Toronto, Cleveland, or Indy for FVV/Brogdon/Sexton and then sends Barnes and picks to Philly right?
Godaddycurse
RealGM
Posts: 22,204
And1: 14,098
Joined: Nov 13, 2019
 

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#1533 » by Godaddycurse » Mon Sep 6, 2021 5:29 pm

jayjaysee wrote:Couple thousand posts late but..

We have done deals where Sac sends Mitchell to Toronto, Cleveland, or Indy for FVV/Brogdon/Sexton and then sends Barnes and picks to Philly right?


only 30 pages late :)

Godaddycurse wrote:Kings out: Hield, Bagley, Mitchell, 2022 unprotected 1st, 2023 unprotected swap, 2024 unprotected 1st
Kings in: Simmons, Scott (S&T)

Indy out: Brogdon
Indy in: Bagley, Mitchell

Philly out: Simmons, Mike Scott (S&T)
Philly in Brogdon, Hield, SAC 2022+2024 1st, 2023 swap


did hield and picks here but could be barnes and (less) picks too
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 20,990
And1: 7,908
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#1534 » by jayjaysee » Mon Sep 6, 2021 5:35 pm

Godaddycurse wrote:
jayjaysee wrote:Couple thousand posts late but..

We have done deals where Sac sends Mitchell to Toronto, Cleveland, or Indy for FVV/Brogdon/Sexton and then sends Barnes and picks to Philly right?


only 30 pages late :)

Godaddycurse wrote:Kings out: Hield, Bagley, Mitchell, 2022 unprotected 1st, 2023 unprotected swap, 2024 unprotected 1st
Kings in: Simmons, Scott (S&T)

Indy out: Brogdon
Indy in: Bagley, Mitchell

Philly out: Simmons, Mike Scott (S&T)
Philly in Brogdon, Hield, SAC 2022+2024 1st, 2023 swap


did hield and picks here but could be barnes and (less) picks too


I figured Realgm had covered every single basic Simmons template but wanted to check.

Yeah, if it’s Brogdon/FVV I think Philly would take Barnes+first over Hield+2 firsts.

If it’s Sexton then I think Philly takes the two firsts as they’re probably looking to flip Buddy and assets for someone like Barnes or Brogdon.
BoogieTime
General Manager
Posts: 8,381
And1: 3,062
Joined: Feb 09, 2017
 

Re: Sixers Accept Reality w LAC 

Post#1535 » by BoogieTime » Mon Sep 6, 2021 6:21 pm

Tomjas wrote:
OGSactownballer wrote:
BoogieTime wrote:
The Kings are part of the three

And I hope where he wants to play figures into what opposing teams will offer. I also hope Rich Paul will have sway over that as well


Typical LA fan (although admittedly it’s usually Laker Dan’s that do this) conveniently forgetting two things.

First there are four California teams.

Second, there are already known reports that the Lakers are a hard no for him. The three teams are the Dubs, Mings and Clippers.

The part you missed in your statement was three pieces.

First, Joe Lacob has already been quoted since before the draft as stating that they are keeping the youth. He knows he is rammed to the stratosphere paying out the current stars. He is looking at four times the base salaries this year with repeater tax. They have no option to trade away their developmental high draft picks. They must have some controlled and cheap talent coming up. And don’t pass Wiggins off as some kind of good deal. He was just rated as one of the ten worst contracts in the NBA. PHI already has one in Harris. They aren’t taking on two and nobody else is going to take in two more years of Wiggins.

You make some good points about the Clippers, but ultimately they aren’t that string of win now pieces, rather they are just pieces and not one of them stands out. And you have no draft picks to offer.

Side note, neither the Dubs nor the Clippers picks will really have any serious value (barring some complete collapse of their stars) until at least 2026 when their stars age out and they start to fall off.

Sacramento ultimately can beat anyone if McNair wants to pay the extra in picks. We have win now guys that fit the PHI roster and know their roles already. We have food picks and own all our own so can send whatever ends up being the reasonable ask when it’s time. And finally we actually have a roster pretty much no matter how you construct the players (salary) part of the trade, that can fit Simmons and improve with him.

I also see a multi team deal becoming a stronger possibility as time ticks by to fit all the needs of the interested teams.

Finally, I believe that any other team besides these three that think it’s going. To be made to work if they get Simmons are fooling g themselves and setting up fir a world of hurt and damage if they ignore his ask to the three teams specified. They also need to keep in mind to not cross Klutch before LeBron retires or they will not get any of their clients or will be out over the same barrel as PHI right now.


No evidence that Simmons will only go to California other than a discredited report


Reported multiple times, never discredited.

Thats not to say he wont go to other teams, but his 'preference' is obvious
OGSactownballer
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,705
And1: 1,367
Joined: Oct 02, 2005

Re: Sixers Accept Reality w LAC 

Post#1536 » by OGSactownballer » Mon Sep 6, 2021 6:32 pm

BoogieTime wrote:
Tomjas wrote:
OGSactownballer wrote:
Typical LA fan (although admittedly it’s usually Laker Dan’s that do this) conveniently forgetting two things.

First there are four California teams.

Second, there are already known reports that the Lakers are a hard no for him. The three teams are the Dubs, Mings and Clippers.

The part you missed in your statement was three pieces.

First, Joe Lacob has already been quoted since before the draft as stating that they are keeping the youth. He knows he is rammed to the stratosphere paying out the current stars. He is looking at four times the base salaries this year with repeater tax. They have no option to trade away their developmental high draft picks. They must have some controlled and cheap talent coming up. And don’t pass Wiggins off as some kind of good deal. He was just rated as one of the ten worst contracts in the NBA. PHI already has one in Harris. They aren’t taking on two and nobody else is going to take in two more years of Wiggins.

You make some good points about the Clippers, but ultimately they aren’t that string of win now pieces, rather they are just pieces and not one of them stands out. And you have no draft picks to offer.

Side note, neither the Dubs nor the Clippers picks will really have any serious value (barring some complete collapse of their stars) until at least 2026 when their stars age out and they start to fall off.

Sacramento ultimately can beat anyone if McNair wants to pay the extra in picks. We have win now guys that fit the PHI roster and know their roles already. We have food picks and own all our own so can send whatever ends up being the reasonable ask when it’s time. And finally we actually have a roster pretty much no matter how you construct the players (salary) part of the trade, that can fit Simmons and improve with him.

I also see a multi team deal becoming a stronger possibility as time ticks by to fit all the needs of the interested teams.

Finally, I believe that any other team besides these three that think it’s going. To be made to work if they get Simmons are fooling g themselves and setting up fir a world of hurt and damage if they ignore his ask to the three teams specified. They also need to keep in mind to not cross Klutch before LeBron retires or they will not get any of their clients or will be out over the same barrel as PHI right now.


No evidence that Simmons will only go to California other than a discredited report


Reported multiple times, never discredited.

Thats not to say he wont go to other teams, but his 'preference' is obvious


And as I recall at least two of the reports I saw were actually direct quotes from Klutch.

That’s really what is most important because there is an implied future threat there.

The second is the one that said that Rich Paul wants Maxey out too. Pretty obvious he (LeBron) is not happy about how PHI treated Ben after the playoff series loss to ATL.
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,748
And1: 14,101
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Sixers Accept Reality w LAC 

Post#1537 » by JRoy » Mon Sep 6, 2021 6:37 pm

clippertown wrote:I get that the Simmons situation is a tough one. In my opinion, Philly has Embid with two years on his deal and everything must be done to get him believing that the franchise has a plan, or it all falls apart when Joel leaves for nothing. The Simmons situation is unresolvable and best handled by giving him what he wants, with the goal of making the team more competitive in the next TWO years, not for the long term future. Embid is a special talent and no matter what he needs to stay a Sixer.

Since Ben is demanding a trade to just three CA teams, this puts all other teams in a complex situation. If they trade young talent for Ben and he is unhappy, then they need to deal with locker room issues - basically inheriting Philly’s problems at the sacrifice of their own future. Sending Ben to Minny for example, would cost the Wolves a fortune and they would be guaranteed to lose him for nothing in four years, which won’t be good value. Small market teams want players that want them, especially when it costs a third of the cap. They don’t want players that can’t wait to leave, harming the team culture.

If GSW want Ben, they have the best assets. Wiseman and Wiggins (plus a few picks) have the greatest value, but does it really work for either team? For GSW, they have to figure out how to win with both Draymond and Ben on the floor. They also lose their best SF with nobody to replace him but Simmons (who would be a terrible SF). For Philly, they have to pay for Wiggins who won’t move the needle and get a backup C that is also not needed. The picks don’t help now, which is the goal.

For the Clippers, they can offer Morris Sr, Kennard, Mann and Reggie should they wait till Dec 15 or replace Reggie with Bledsoe (removing Kennard) if they want to act now. Whilst this offer is not at the correct value for Ben, it does actually help Philly compete today. Morris Sr is the perfect PF to play with Embid due to his ability to spread the floor and rebound. Kennard is a specialist at spreading the floor and distributing and is only 24. Mann is a brilliant defender with solid ability to hit the 3 from the corner. Reggie can handle the PG duties and step up under pressure. Even Bledsoe can return to the Bucks and be a solid presence, if that’s what the team desires. Overall, the Sixers are better immediately and that keeps Embid happier.

The Lakers have nothing to offer.

I get that in a perfect situation, Ben is worth an all-star return but considering the numerous issues, my question is whether the Sixers would become a better team this season if they traded Ben to the Clippers - regardless of long term value.


Not sure what PHI will get for Young Socialite but it will be better than this. Not one guy that would start on a good team and no picks.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 35,351
And1: 17,806
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#1538 » by babyjax13 » Mon Sep 6, 2021 6:45 pm

I feel like we are waiting at this point because Philly has agreed to a trade for a player that can't be traded until the season starts.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
the_process
RealGM
Posts: 29,275
And1: 10,381
Joined: May 01, 2010

Re: Sixers Accept Reality w LAC 

Post#1539 » by the_process » Mon Sep 6, 2021 7:04 pm

BoogieTime wrote:
Tomjas wrote:
OGSactownballer wrote:
Typical LA fan (although admittedly it’s usually Laker Dan’s that do this) conveniently forgetting two things.

First there are four California teams.

Second, there are already known reports that the Lakers are a hard no for him. The three teams are the Dubs, Mings and Clippers.

The part you missed in your statement was three pieces.

First, Joe Lacob has already been quoted since before the draft as stating that they are keeping the youth. He knows he is rammed to the stratosphere paying out the current stars. He is looking at four times the base salaries this year with repeater tax. They have no option to trade away their developmental high draft picks. They must have some controlled and cheap talent coming up. And don’t pass Wiggins off as some kind of good deal. He was just rated as one of the ten worst contracts in the NBA. PHI already has one in Harris. They aren’t taking on two and nobody else is going to take in two more years of Wiggins.

You make some good points about the Clippers, but ultimately they aren’t that string of win now pieces, rather they are just pieces and not one of them stands out. And you have no draft picks to offer.

Side note, neither the Dubs nor the Clippers picks will really have any serious value (barring some complete collapse of their stars) until at least 2026 when their stars age out and they start to fall off.

Sacramento ultimately can beat anyone if McNair wants to pay the extra in picks. We have win now guys that fit the PHI roster and know their roles already. We have food picks and own all our own so can send whatever ends up being the reasonable ask when it’s time. And finally we actually have a roster pretty much no matter how you construct the players (salary) part of the trade, that can fit Simmons and improve with him.

I also see a multi team deal becoming a stronger possibility as time ticks by to fit all the needs of the interested teams.

Finally, I believe that any other team besides these three that think it’s going. To be made to work if they get Simmons are fooling g themselves and setting up fir a world of hurt and damage if they ignore his ask to the three teams specified. They also need to keep in mind to not cross Klutch before LeBron retires or they will not get any of their clients or will be out over the same barrel as PHI right now.


No evidence that Simmons will only go to California other than a discredited report


Reported multiple times, never discredited.

Thats not to say he wont go to other teams, but his 'preference' is obvious


The "multiple reports" always reference Dumas, who had to retract the Maxey blurb. So yeah, his reporting is all tainted now.

Also there have been persistent rumors out there that Simmons will go anywhere, he just wants out of Philly, and wanting out is the only truly consistent reporting there has been.
BoogieTime
General Manager
Posts: 8,381
And1: 3,062
Joined: Feb 09, 2017
 

Re: Sixers Accept Reality w LAC 

Post#1540 » by BoogieTime » Mon Sep 6, 2021 7:16 pm

the_process wrote:
BoogieTime wrote:
Tomjas wrote:
No evidence that Simmons will only go to California other than a discredited report


Reported multiple times, never discredited.

Thats not to say he wont go to other teams, but his 'preference' is obvious


The "multiple reports" always reference Dumas, who had to retract the Maxey blurb. So yeah, his reporting is all tainted now.

Also there have been persistent rumors out there that Simmons will go anywhere, he just wants out of Philly, and wanting out is the only truly consistent reporting there has been.


I'll trust Dumas over Chris Broussard

He may have retracted it on Paul's behalf after the backlash he received

Return to Trades and Transactions