ParticleMan wrote:Looks like a camp deal.
I'd say Grant is one of the least likely to be traded, especially since Ime wants solid defenders.
Damn, you´re killing me. Have mercy!!
Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts
ParticleMan wrote:Looks like a camp deal.
I'd say Grant is one of the least likely to be traded, especially since Ime wants solid defenders.
BostonCouchGM wrote:ballup wrote:BostonCouchGM wrote:
If it was a “Schtick” and old, you’d simply ignore it rather than be triggered and respond. The reason you do is because it’s true and it hits home
lmao. I respond because you're horribly off. Jaylen moves off ball and into good spacing to get open. Both viable defenders (Rubio and Ingles) who were supposed to close out were good on ball defenders at the time. They got tangled with one another due to Larkin's dribble penetration. People are celebrating the play and yet here you are being sour because you have this weird grudge.
relax, pointing out Jaylen gets wide open looks more than other players isn't being sour. I'm genuinely curious when/if teams will stop letting it happen. He's clearly proven he's too good to leave wide open and should be more of a focus for defenses else he will beat them so when will he attract even half the attention Tatum gets? And if he does get more attention, will he rise to the occasion and overcome it? You guys get so sensitive over Jaylen.

bucknersrevenge wrote:
Wow...
"Awful"?? This feels like a really strong take for an Exhibit-10 contract. Almost personal even. Guy wasn't even that bad last year..
TheMartian wrote:Why not Harry Giles though? Because he won't do 2-ways or exhibit 10 deals?
EDIT: Oh I see. He's signing with the Clippers.
tfribs45 wrote:bucknersrevenge wrote:Bohemian wrote:
Awful. First mistake by Brad.
Wow...
"Awful"?? This feels like a really strong take for an Exhibit-10 contract. Almost personal even. Guy wasn't even that bad last year..
meh, he has cement in his shoes. Way too slow to play any kind of role on this squad.

BostonCouchGM wrote:TheMartian wrote:Why not Harry Giles though? Because he won't do 2-ways or exhibit 10 deals?
EDIT: Oh I see. He's signing with the Clippers.
I really don't understand why we didn't sign him. All we need is a big we can play in case of injuries who can play the 4/5. Maybe give him 10-12 minutes a night to keep fresh. Giles is more than capable of holding his own in this capacity and at just 23 y/o with very little mileage and experience, still has potential to unlock.
bisme37 wrote:
But why? It's just a non-guaranteed training camp deal with the option to be converted to a two-way contract. It seems kinda awful for Luke Kornet but I don't know why it's awful for the Celtics.
theman wrote:This is a small trade that I think fits the time line for both teams involved.
Boston Trades:
Romeo Langford
Houston Trades:
Daniel House Jr.
I know Langford is a future all-star but this makes the Celtics better today.
Hal14 wrote:theman wrote:This is a small trade that I think fits the time line for both teams involved.
Boston Trades:
Romeo Langford
Houston Trades:
Daniel House Jr.
I know Langford is a future all-star but this makes the Celtics better today.
Does it?

theman wrote:This is a small trade that I think fits the time line for both teams involved.
Boston Trades:
Romeo Langford
Houston Trades:
Daniel House Jr.
I know Langford is a future all-star but this makes the Celtics better today.
