Tony Parker and Manu Ginobili.
Moderators: Harry Garris, ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285
Tony Parker and Manu Ginobili.
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 913
- And1: 243
- Joined: Jun 03, 2013
Tony Parker and Manu Ginobili.
Both Parker and Ginoboli are both most likely a lock for the hall of Fame. If both of them didn't play their entire careers on a title contender do you believe the would be considered hall of famers now?
For me if they did get in it wouldn't have been an automatic lock for them.
Want to hear everyone's opinion.
For me if they did get in it wouldn't have been an automatic lock for them.
Want to hear everyone's opinion.
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
- UcanUwill
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,487
- And1: 28,785
- Joined: Aug 07, 2011
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
Manu sure, Parker maybe.
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 957
- And1: 585
- Joined: Apr 12, 2014
- Location: Herkimer YMCA
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
ginobili is in even without nba.parker just because of spurs imo.great player though...
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
- Bornstellar
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,370
- And1: 17,307
- Joined: Mar 05, 2018
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
For their international accomplishments probably. Certainly Manu. As long as they made a few all star games I don't see why not
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,862
- And1: 2,102
- Joined: May 04, 2017
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
Manu was lock for HOF in 2004 when Argentina won gold. Parker would also be in HOF just for his international career.
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
- Bologna Smasher
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,971
- And1: 6,182
- Joined: Feb 08, 2007
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
Manu would most likely even be more of a lock if he played on another team. He sacrificed a lot of individual accolades by staying with the Spurs. I think he would've been right up there behind Kobe as the best shooting guard during his era. Think he would've been looked at similarly to how we currently look at Dirk.
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,550
- And1: 5,243
- Joined: Jul 22, 2019
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
I think it's easy to miss just how much flair and skill each of those players had because the team was always the bigger story with the Spurs. Mark me down for both being in the Hall with or without the Spurs.
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
- UcanUwill
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,487
- And1: 28,785
- Joined: Aug 07, 2011
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
Johnny Tomala wrote:Manu was lock for HOF in 2004 when Argentina won gold. Parker would also be in HOF just for his international career.
4 Eurobasket medals, but no Olympic or worlds medal, I am not sure Parker goes in purely by International, he honestly should have been much better FIBA player than what he was I would say.
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,566
- And1: 4,488
- Joined: Aug 02, 2016
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
I'd say Manu would, because if he were on a different team and played 33 mpg he could've averaged 24/5/8 on 60 TS% or so. Tony...idk. Like, what happens if he's on a bad or mediocre team? I don't think his impact was that crazy
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,261
- And1: 3,621
- Joined: Feb 21, 2008
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
UcanUwill wrote:Manu sure, Parker maybe.
Manu was unique... Parker was good, but I am not sure he would get in if he wasn't part of that Spurs core... that said the bar for the BBHOF is pretty low.
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,071
- And1: 2,702
- Joined: Jun 24, 2001
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
Parker and Manu with a couple all star games and being international /Olympians make it in.
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,655
- And1: 4,477
- Joined: Aug 06, 2017
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
Didn't they kind of have something to do with making their teams contenders (and champions)?
Just because it happened to you, doesn't make it interesting.
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.
Yesterday I was lying; today I'm telling the truth.
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.
Yesterday I was lying; today I'm telling the truth.
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
- UcanUwill
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,487
- And1: 28,785
- Joined: Aug 07, 2011
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
ellobo wrote:Didn't they kind of have something to do with making their teams contenders (and champions)?
Of course, but they arent LeBron like talents where they could make any team contender just by themselves. There is hypothetical reality where those guys are on crap teams.
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 42,787
- And1: 22,514
- Joined: Oct 04, 2015
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
UcanUwill wrote:ellobo wrote:Didn't they kind of have something to do with making their teams contenders (and champions)?
Of course, but they arent LeBron like talents where they could make any team contender just by themselves. There is hypothetical reality where those guys are on crap teams.
I dunno...they'd have to take more money than they did for that to work. Both took very team friendly deals which just makes it harder to figure out. There's no world Manu on his deals doesn't end up on a playoff team imo, short of him just being hurt constantly. Parker similarly, he was just an efficient scorer and good teammate. I don't see too many teams who can make it work with him.
But yeah if they went to the twolves, sure no hall for either.
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,031
- And1: 5,966
- Joined: Nov 05, 2019
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
I don't know.
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
- DaddyCool19
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,123
- And1: 6,392
- Joined: Jul 28, 2013
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
Pelly24 wrote:I'd say Manu would, because if he were on a different team and played 33 mpg he could've averaged 24/5/8 on 60 TS% or so. Tony...idk. Like, what happens if he's on a bad or mediocre team? I don't think his impact was that crazy
Wouldn't that lead to him breaking down like in his early thirties? I think there was a reason, that he didn't play too many minutes. Sure I also think he would have put up better numbers from his 04/05-10/11 years, which could be considered his prime (29 MPG, 17/4/4). But 24/5/8 seems a little too optimistic.
I thought he would put up Brandon Roy like numbers before Roy broke down. So 21/5/5ish.
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
- Ryoga Hibiki
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,198
- And1: 6,592
- Joined: Nov 14, 2001
- Location: Warszawa now, but from Northern Italy
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
the bar to enter the HOF is waaaaaaaaaay lower than being another LeBronUcanUwill wrote:ellobo wrote:Didn't they kind of have something to do with making their teams contenders (and champions)?
Of course, but they arent LeBron like talents where they could make any team contender just by themselves. There is hypothetical reality where those guys are on crap teams.
Sent from my Nokia 3210 using RealGM mobile app
Слава Украине!
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,655
- And1: 4,477
- Joined: Aug 06, 2017
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
UcanUwill wrote:ellobo wrote:Didn't they kind of have something to do with making their teams contenders (and champions)?
Of course, but they arent LeBron like talents where they could make any team contender just by themselves. There is hypothetical reality where those guys are on crap teams.
There is a hypothetical reality for everything.
Sure, each of them could hypothetically be on bad rosters and losing teams. But together, they were numbers 2 and 3 of a perennial contender and multichampionship big 3. So taking the team success that they had a major role in achieving away from their resumes is a little too hypothetical for me.
Just because it happened to you, doesn't make it interesting.
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.
Yesterday I was lying; today I'm telling the truth.
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.
Yesterday I was lying; today I'm telling the truth.
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
- Woodsanity
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,943
- And1: 9,911
- Joined: Mar 30, 2012
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
Manu yes easily due to international achievements. TP maybe
Only the playoffs separate the true great ones and frauds.
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
- AdagioPace
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,707
- And1: 7,147
- Joined: Jan 03, 2017
- Location: Contado di Molise
Re: Tony Parker and Manu Ginoboli.
Manu's achievements with Virtus Bologna and Argentina would be too much to ignore even if he played for a **** team. I think he would also manage to get a couple all-stars appearances.
Parker has no business being mentioned in these kind of hypotheticals
Parker has no business being mentioned in these kind of hypotheticals
"La natura gode della natura; la natura trionfa sulla natura; la natura domina la natura" - Ostanes