Pointgod wrote:Clay Davis wrote:You could say that about basically every other team with a superstar. You could say it about the Blazers. Why not say it about the Timberwolves? Doesn't KAT have the same label of being a no-impact scorer that Booker recently shedded?
KAT has shown that he absolutely can’t be “the guy”. Tatum has proven that he can at least lead a team to an Eastern Conference final as the guy. The Suns were at least competitive enough to be in the play in the year before getting Chris Paul while KAT lead the team to the number one overall pick. So that comparison doesn’t work.
As for Portland whatever small difference there is between Tatum and Dame, there’s a significant difference between Brown and McCollum, especially on the defensive end. Not to mention that Portland doesn’t have many trade chips to get an allstar player to add to Dame and McCollum while the Celtics still have all their picks going forward, contracts and coveted players even though Ainge wasted almost of their assets. If the Celtics can trade for a floor raiser like CP3 or Butler (you’ll be surprised at how little they were traded for) then they’re in a good position to take advantage of lucky breaks or the right matchups that could see them in the finals. The Celtics have the right combination of a young superstar, young allstar and decent defensive role players that a more competent GM than Danny Ainge could have turned into a contender.
Clay Davis wrote: You're acting as if the supporting cast on the Suns was the exact same as the Wolves in 2020. Did KAT play with anyone on the level of Deandre Ayton in 2020? What Coach of the Year candidates has KAT played with in an extremely difficult Western conference? Hasn't your entire point been that giving these young superstars solid supporting talent is enough to push them into contention? We should also consider the supporting talent around young superstars when examining the context of their relative success prior to them becoming contenders.
I’m 6 seasons the best a Karl Anthony Towns led team has finished is 8th seed. The same year they had a floor raiser Jimmy Butler. Every other year the best the Wovles have finished is 11th. Booker’s teams haven’t faired much better but it took time for Booker to develop while Towns was that guy from day 1. Before CP3 Booker’s team finished 10th, went on a crazy run to get into the play in tournament. After getting CP3 the team was second in the West, the only addition with CP3 and Jae Crowder. I don’t blame Towns completely, but he’s demonstrated he’s absolutely not “the guy”. He’s the ideal second best player.
Clay Davis wrote: The Celtics have been trading for floor raisers for the past 3 seasons. Kyrie, Horford, Kemba (not including Hayward since they got pretty unlucky there). They haven't had that success. Furthermore, it's probably not fair to say that Ainge is incompetent, since the pinnacle of success for a rebuilding team is -- according to you -- acquiring young talent, which he has done a pretty remarkable job of by your own admission.
Horford and Kemba are not floor raisers. I don’t know why you’re ignoring the fact that when Horford, Kyrie and Hayward were on the team, it didn’t coincide with Tatum and Brown’s peak development as players. If you drop 2019 Kyrie on the team now with All NBA Tatum and Allstar Brown they’d be talked about as title contenders. Hell if you put 2021 Kyrie they’d be talked about as title contenders.
No Ainge is 100% incompetent. He lived off the reputation of the Nets trade (how he got Tatum and Brown) and he got nothing with his assets. His drafting was hit or miss and the team did as well as they did because of Brad Stevens not Ainge. I’ve never been a fan of Ainge. He got seriously overrated because of that Nets trade.