DCasey91 wrote:Duke4life831 wrote:CoreyVillains wrote:Put together a pre season scouting video for Banchero. Dude is a physical monster and has all the tools. Doesn’t always go as hard as he can. Gonna be interesting to see if the increase in comp and what should be a lesser offensive load will help him get after it on both ends. Having said that, still think he ends up number one overall next year.
I disagree that he is a physical roster and has all the tools. If that was the case he would be the obvious #1 pick. Every measurement he has pretty much had a 1:1 height to wingspan. So say he ends up being 6'8 with a 6'8 or 6'9 wingspan. Then throw in the fact he isn't a bad athlete by any means, but he also isn't a great athlete. He isn't some explosive leaper that can make up for a lack of size with getting an extra 5-6 inches on his vert.
Now if he does end up being 6'10-6'11 and has a 6'11-7' wingspan. The idea of him playing the small ball 5 is not just plausible, but pretty obvious. But again the question is where does he land, is he 6'8 or is he 6'10-6'11?
Now is there the possibility that he can be a PJ Tucker kind of defender but in a 6'8 body? Sure if that happens him playing the small ball 5 can still be a thing. But as of right now he isn't viewed as that kind of defensive prospect.
Im very much looking forward to him at Duke this year and I have him on my top tier of prospects this year. But his physical tools are probably his biggest question mark at the moment in my opinion.
This is the part I don’t get. He’s 6”9-6”10” 250 pounds and is enormous.
Physical tools is actually the very least on what you’re looking at with Banchero. It’s the skill aspect and he’s shown more than enough there. Can’t wait to see him at Duke. You are going to be surprised at how good he’ll be. His development has been class even if he wasn’t a top ranked prospect.
You see where he dunked from in a recent clip?
He’s a flat out better athlete than Cade even if they had the exact same measurables.
I’m not questioning his ability, I’ve done nothing but praise Paolo on here. I have him in my top tier for this draft.
But again let’s say he ends up being 6’9 with a 6’10 wingspan. Those are not elite physical tools, especially when you consider him not being overly explosive, not saying he’s not a good athlete, he’s not a wow explosive athlete though.
Then add in the fact that he’s not going to be playing the 3 in the NBA, he’s going to be a 4 and hopefully a 5 as well. Yes he’s going to be very strong, but no 6’9 with a 6’10 wingspan is not elite physical tools when talking about a player you want to be playing minutes at the 5.
Put it one way, if there was no doubt Paolo was say 6’11 with a 7’4 wingspan, he would most likely be the consensus #1 guy even over Chet coming into the season. That’s what it would look like if he had the elite physical tools.
Again to be crystal clear, I’m not saying Paolo is a bad prospect. I’m not saying Paolo has bad physical tools. I’m saying there is a big question mark with him at the moment and that question is what are his actual physical tools. Did he really grow to be 6’11 and a 7+ wingspan? Or is he really around that 6’8 and 6’10 wingspan. That really seems to be the big question with him at the moment.