Ballerhogger wrote:zimpy27 wrote:Murray, MPJ for Simmons, Maxey, Thybulle
Terrible for 76ers ..can’t seen them doing this unless they really good about MPJ
Really? That bad?
What package is fair for Murray and MPJ in your opinion?
Moderators: Trader_Joe, BullyKing, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Andre Roberstan, loserX

Ballerhogger wrote:zimpy27 wrote:Murray, MPJ for Simmons, Maxey, Thybulle
Terrible for 76ers ..can’t seen them doing this unless they really good about MPJ

Ballerhogger wrote:zimpy27 wrote:Murray, MPJ for Simmons, Maxey, Thybulle
Terrible for 76ers ..can’t seen them doing this unless they really good about MPJ
the_process wrote:Curry and Simmons for Green and Murray?
jayjaysee wrote:the_process wrote:Curry and Simmons for Green and Murray?
Think Simmons will be a sixer Dec 14th?
I would just try to make it work by having Denver get whatever the third team is giving up since Simmons is just a weird fit with the way Denver has built their team.
Sexton+ for Murray for Simmons based three team deal?
Again don’t love Denver giving up on Murray or Philly telling Joel to take a year off. But think that’s an easier deal to make work.
the_process wrote:jayjaysee wrote:the_process wrote:Curry and Simmons for Green and Murray?
Think Simmons will be a sixer Dec 14th?
I would just try to make it work by having Denver get whatever the third team is giving up since Simmons is just a weird fit with the way Denver has built their team.
Sexton+ for Murray for Simmons based three team deal?
Again don’t love Denver giving up on Murray or Philly telling Joel to take a year off. But think that’s an easier deal to make work.
Oh Green can't be aggregated either? Well then I have no idea what other salary DEN has to match Curry then.
Simmons for Murray straight up works. No reason to add Sexton. I wouldn't be interested in dealing with CLE at this point unless Garland or Mobley is part of the return.
Sportfan73 wrote:the_process wrote:jayjaysee wrote:
Think Simmons will be a sixer Dec 14th?
I would just try to make it work by having Denver get whatever the third team is giving up since Simmons is just a weird fit with the way Denver has built their team.
Sexton+ for Murray for Simmons based three team deal?
Again don’t love Denver giving up on Murray or Philly telling Joel to take a year off. But think that’s an easier deal to make work.
Oh Green can't be aggregated either? Well then I have no idea what other salary DEN has to match Curry then.
Simmons for Murray straight up works. No reason to add Sexton. I wouldn't be interested in dealing with CLE at this point unless Garland or Mobley is part of the return.
This is why I said Simmons, Curry, and shake for Murray and Morris
zimpy27 wrote:Ballerhogger wrote:zimpy27 wrote:Murray, MPJ for Simmons, Maxey, Thybulle
Terrible for 76ers ..can’t seen them doing this unless they really good about MPJ
Really? That bad?
What package is fair for Murray and MPJ in your opinion?
Ballerhogger wrote:zimpy27 wrote:Ballerhogger wrote:Terrible for 76ers ..can’t seen them doing this unless they really good about MPJ
Really? That bad?
What package is fair for Murray and MPJ in your opinion?
Murray won’t be playing until January , they want to win now . MPJ defense is bad , has had back issues . thybulle is needed to defend the wings in the East. I’d say give up maxey first before thy
Texas Chuck wrote:timeaftertime wrote:Interesting to see that the return on a potential Simmons trade has actually gone up in the last few weeks here. I think the opposite is probably true. With Simmons digging in his heels as camp starts next week, I'm not sure why his value wouldn't be plummeting. The idea that Simmons, Thybulle, Maxey, and a first for Beal is "too much" for the Sixers or that the Wolves would give up Ant in a Simmons deal at this point is really, really silly. Yes, Ben Simmons was an all-star, but he's not in the upper-tier of NBA players and when was the last time that teams got even a good return for a lower-level all-star on a max deal?
The Wolves got Bayless, Covington, Saric, and a 2nd for Jimmy in 2018.
The Hornets got Gordon, Kaman, Aminu, and a first for Chris Paul.
The Rockets got Chris Paul (a then damaged asset) and two protected firsts for Russell Westbrook.
The Pacers got Sabonis and Oladipo for Paul George.
The Pelicans got Eric Bledsoe, two late, late firsts, and two pick swaps (that very likely won't happen) for Jrue Holiday.
The Knicks got Kanter, McDermott, and a second for Melo.
Yes, there were extenuating circumstances in almost every one of those situations, but there's extenuating circumstances here too. A team that could potentially be a title contender's second-best player is not coming to training camp and all indications are that he's going to ride this thing out as long as he has to. Unless that changes, I think some of you are being very unrealistic in regards to Simmons' value.
Jrue was expiring. Dipo and Sabonis had good value at the time. It wasn't this Dipo.
Ya'll was all wrong on Paul and some of us told you at the time.
Kaman was an all-star, Gordon was a rising star, and Aminu a recent lotto pick. It didn't pan out, but that was a lot of value.
And Butler was a huge mess and was expiring.
These feel like cherry-picked examples.
Why not use KP where the Knicks dumped $60M in unwanted money, got a recent lotto pick, an unprotected first, and an additional first? And he was injured and expiring and not the player Simmons was and he was a malcontent having made it clear he wanted no part of New York.
Why not use Vuc, a lessor player who returned two lightly protected picks, a young big, and they got to dump a bad contract?
Have to be careful not to just use the examples that fit the conclusion you've already reached while telling everyone else they are being unrealistic.

jazzfan1971 wrote:Crazy idea.
Give Seattle a team. Give them Simmons. Philly gets the first 2 first rounders from Seattle. #4 in year one and whatever spot it lands in year #2.

patman66 wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:timeaftertime wrote:Interesting to see that the return on a potential Simmons trade has actually gone up in the last few weeks here. I think the opposite is probably true. With Simmons digging in his heels as camp starts next week, I'm not sure why his value wouldn't be plummeting. The idea that Simmons, Thybulle, Maxey, and a first for Beal is "too much" for the Sixers or that the Wolves would give up Ant in a Simmons deal at this point is really, really silly. Yes, Ben Simmons was an all-star, but he's not in the upper-tier of NBA players and when was the last time that teams got even a good return for a lower-level all-star on a max deal?
The Wolves got Bayless, Covington, Saric, and a 2nd for Jimmy in 2018.
The Hornets got Gordon, Kaman, Aminu, and a first for Chris Paul.
The Rockets got Chris Paul (a then damaged asset) and two protected firsts for Russell Westbrook.
The Pacers got Sabonis and Oladipo for Paul George.
The Pelicans got Eric Bledsoe, two late, late firsts, and two pick swaps (that very likely won't happen) for Jrue Holiday.
The Knicks got Kanter, McDermott, and a second for Melo.
Yes, there were extenuating circumstances in almost every one of those situations, but there's extenuating circumstances here too. A team that could potentially be a title contender's second-best player is not coming to training camp and all indications are that he's going to ride this thing out as long as he has to. Unless that changes, I think some of you are being very unrealistic in regards to Simmons' value.
Jrue was expiring. Dipo and Sabonis had good value at the time. It wasn't this Dipo.
Ya'll was all wrong on Paul and some of us told you at the time.
Kaman was an all-star, Gordon was a rising star, and Aminu a recent lotto pick. It didn't pan out, but that was a lot of value.
And Butler was a huge mess and was expiring.
These feel like cherry-picked examples.
Why not use KP where the Knicks dumped $60M in unwanted money, got a recent lotto pick, an unprotected first, and an additional first? And he was injured and expiring and not the player Simmons was and he was a malcontent having made it clear he wanted no part of New York.
Why not use Vuc, a lessor player who returned two lightly protected picks, a young big, and they got to dump a bad contract?
Have to be careful not to just use the examples that fit the conclusion you've already reached while telling everyone else they are being unrealistic.
maybe it was just me, but I thought Dipo was overpaid and Sabonis was a project who scored 6 points with a .45 eff after playing 20mpg with the thunder. I thought the pacers got hosed at the time.
patman66 wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:timeaftertime wrote:Interesting to see that the return on a potential Simmons trade has actually gone up in the last few weeks here. I think the opposite is probably true. With Simmons digging in his heels as camp starts next week, I'm not sure why his value wouldn't be plummeting. The idea that Simmons, Thybulle, Maxey, and a first for Beal is "too much" for the Sixers or that the Wolves would give up Ant in a Simmons deal at this point is really, really silly. Yes, Ben Simmons was an all-star, but he's not in the upper-tier of NBA players and when was the last time that teams got even a good return for a lower-level all-star on a max deal?
The Wolves got Bayless, Covington, Saric, and a 2nd for Jimmy in 2018.
The Hornets got Gordon, Kaman, Aminu, and a first for Chris Paul.
The Rockets got Chris Paul (a then damaged asset) and two protected firsts for Russell Westbrook.
The Pacers got Sabonis and Oladipo for Paul George.
The Pelicans got Eric Bledsoe, two late, late firsts, and two pick swaps (that very likely won't happen) for Jrue Holiday.
The Knicks got Kanter, McDermott, and a second for Melo.
Yes, there were extenuating circumstances in almost every one of those situations, but there's extenuating circumstances here too. A team that could potentially be a title contender's second-best player is not coming to training camp and all indications are that he's going to ride this thing out as long as he has to. Unless that changes, I think some of you are being very unrealistic in regards to Simmons' value.
Jrue was expiring. Dipo and Sabonis had good value at the time. It wasn't this Dipo.
Ya'll was all wrong on Paul and some of us told you at the time.
Kaman was an all-star, Gordon was a rising star, and Aminu a recent lotto pick. It didn't pan out, but that was a lot of value.
And Butler was a huge mess and was expiring.
These feel like cherry-picked examples.
Why not use KP where the Knicks dumped $60M in unwanted money, got a recent lotto pick, an unprotected first, and an additional first? And he was injured and expiring and not the player Simmons was and he was a malcontent having made it clear he wanted no part of New York.
Why not use Vuc, a lessor player who returned two lightly protected picks, a young big, and they got to dump a bad contract?
Have to be careful not to just use the examples that fit the conclusion you've already reached while telling everyone else they are being unrealistic.
maybe it was just me, but I thought Dipo was overpaid and Sabonis was a project who scored 6 points with a .45 eff after playing 20mpg with the thunder. I thought the pacers got hosed at the time.
basketballwacko2 wrote:The 76ers need to do something sooner rather than later as this drags out Ben's value only drops.
doctor him wrote:basketballwacko2 wrote:The 76ers need to do something sooner rather than later as this drags out Ben's value only drops.
Actually, that's not true.
Simmons' "value" actually will go "up" once the season starts. How? I'm glad you asked.
Right now every team has their "plan" for the season and expect it to bear fruit. But some teams are going to start out slower than they expected. For some it'll be much slower.
So let's say for argument's sake that Portland starts out 2-8 in their first 10. What does Lillard say then?
Or whatever team. Again, it only takes 1 or 2 teams to come close to the asking price to get a deal rolling.
So Simmons' value can't go anywhere but up, and Morey won't be under any actual pressure until the all star break to make a move. Even if the Sixers start out at like a 4 or 5 seed.
doctor him wrote:basketballwacko2 wrote:The 76ers need to do something sooner rather than later as this drags out Ben's value only drops.
Actually, that's not true.
Simmons' "value" actually will go "up" once the season starts. How? I'm glad you asked.
Right now every team has their "plan" for the season and expect it to bear fruit. But some teams are going to start out slower than they expected. For some it'll be much slower.
So let's say for argument's sake that Portland starts out 2-8 in their first 10. What does Lillard say then?
Or whatever team. Again, it only takes 1 or 2 teams to come close to the asking price to get a deal rolling.
So Simmons' value can't go anywhere but up, and Morey won't be under any actual pressure until the all star break to make a move. Even if the Sixers start out at like a 4 or 5 seed.
doctor him wrote:basketballwacko2 wrote:The 76ers need to do something sooner rather than later as this drags out Ben's value only drops.
Actually, that's not true.
Simmons' "value" actually will go "up" once the season starts. How? I'm glad you asked.
Right now every team has their "plan" for the season and expect it to bear fruit. But some teams are going to start out slower than they expected. For some it'll be much slower.
So let's say for argument's sake that Portland starts out 2-8 in their first 10. What does Lillard say then?
Or whatever team. Again, it only takes 1 or 2 teams to come close to the asking price to get a deal rolling.
So Simmons' value can't go anywhere but up, and Morey won't be under any actual pressure until the all star break to make a move. Even if the Sixers start out at like a 4 or 5 seed.
Edrees wrote:JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all
I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
doctor him wrote:basketballwacko2 wrote:The 76ers need to do something sooner rather than later as this drags out Ben's value only drops.
Actually, that's not true.
Simmons' "value" actually will go "up" once the season starts. How? I'm glad you asked.
Right now every team has their "plan" for the season and expect it to bear fruit. But some teams are going to start out slower than they expected. For some it'll be much slower.
So let's say for argument's sake that Portland starts out 2-8 in their first 10. What does Lillard say then?
Or whatever team. Again, it only takes 1 or 2 teams to come close to the asking price to get a deal rolling.
So Simmons' value can't go anywhere but up, and Morey won't be under any actual pressure until the all star break to make a move. Even if the Sixers start out at like a 4 or 5 seed.
Return to Trades and Transactions