Wolveswin wrote:eminence wrote:Wolveswin wrote:Wiggins is negative value and his value diving fast. Any San Fran argument he is a good player to them is dying on the vine quickly.
Wiggins + 1st for Prince would be a VERY lucky outcome for them.
Beasley = Moody.
Like I said, way off, apparently due to a very very different evaluation of Beasley, who I think would return a late 1st to the right team (see Clarkson to Utah for 2 2nds).
You say way off, but your explanation is a late lotto vs a late 1st (which I don’t agree with). That is not way off.
Plus you would be lucky to get a playable vet expiring for Wiggins at this point. I would bet a poll of Prince vs. Wiggins would yield huge value advantage to Prince.
You need to provide substance how this is “way” off.
I'm not interested in pedantry around 'way off'.
I would consider the deal with Moody removed (Wiggins/1st for Beasley/Prince), but it wouldn't be a snap deal, I would shop for better players, and honestly believe we could get them, multiple propositions from fans of other squads have looked better to me (Chuck has proposed Dallas deals I'd prefer, I've seen Magic deals I'd like more, I personally like the Wizards as a partner).
















