Lovetron Joe wrote:Lovetron Joe wrote:?s=20
Pistons offer around Grant, Hayes and Bey. Works on a variety of levels.
If that offer is on the table PHI should take it
Moderators: HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890
Lovetron Joe wrote:Lovetron Joe wrote:?s=20
Pistons offer around Grant, Hayes and Bey. Works on a variety of levels.
Edrees wrote:JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all
I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Ballerhogger wrote:Lovetron Joe wrote:Lovetron Joe wrote:?s=20
Pistons offer around Grant, Hayes and Bey. Works on a variety of levels.
I dobut they would offer their best player for him. Hes not go to first option they would want him as second option playmaker for grant.
GutUNC wrote:Roy The Natural wrote:zimpy27 wrote:
I kind of think it makes Ben look like a difficult player though. That's why I think it hurts trade value. Also makes it clear that Philly can't mend it with Ben, a narrative Philly are trying to push is that they can.
It's interesting because I really don't see any reason whatsoever for Ben's value to rise when he's not on the court. We haven't really heard anything outside Kyrie that sounds remotely close to what Morey reportedly wants. In the end, a Ben Simmons trade may be tied more to the play of Maxey and/or Thybulle and them proving to be enough to get the 76ers over the hump in trade conversations for a better player than Simmons.
I just don't see how you go from Brogdon and a 1st and offers like that to acquiring Beal for Simmons and picks/unspectacular prospects. There's an implicit notion that of a team plays poorly to start the year, then all of the sudden the play is to value a guy a ton more than you did 2 months ago. When he's not on the court to prove that you should. I just don't think it's a reality based belief.
We've watched 4 consecutive seasons of Ben Simmons being largely the exact same player on the court (his defensive improvement from good to elite aside). What exactly is there left to "prove" on the court?
Roy The Natural wrote:GutUNC wrote:Roy The Natural wrote:
It's interesting because I really don't see any reason whatsoever for Ben's value to rise when he's not on the court. We haven't really heard anything outside Kyrie that sounds remotely close to what Morey reportedly wants. In the end, a Ben Simmons trade may be tied more to the play of Maxey and/or Thybulle and them proving to be enough to get the 76ers over the hump in trade conversations for a better player than Simmons.
I just don't see how you go from Brogdon and a 1st and offers like that to acquiring Beal for Simmons and picks/unspectacular prospects. There's an implicit notion that of a team plays poorly to start the year, then all of the sudden the play is to value a guy a ton more than you did 2 months ago. When he's not on the court to prove that you should. I just don't think it's a reality based belief.
We've watched 4 consecutive seasons of Ben Simmons being largely the exact same player on the court (his defensive improvement from good to elite aside). What exactly is there left to "prove" on the court?
Exactly. In what way should we expect his value to rise from where it's at now?... The 76ers have been exploring trade options for months. What exactly would trigger a massive leap in Simmons value? If he's not on the court, I don't see a scenario in which his value moves in the direction that Morey would like.
Roy The Natural wrote:Exactly. In what way should we expect his value to rise from where it's at now?... The 76ers have been exploring trade options for months. What exactly would trigger a massive leap in Simmons value? If he's not on the court, I don't see a scenario in which his value moves in the direction that Morey would like.
Lovetron Joe wrote:Lovetron Joe wrote:?s=20
Pistons offer around Grant, Hayes and Bey. Works on a variety of levels.

Lovetron Joe wrote:?s=20
the_process wrote:Lovetron Joe wrote:Lovetron Joe wrote:?s=20
Pistons offer around Grant, Hayes and Bey. Works on a variety of levels.
I was going to say the Pistons are a new team interested. Any offer with Grant and Bey is a yes.
NYG wrote:I really think unless Beal or Lillard become available, he's staying on the 76ers.
Also for all of his flaws, tell me a better individual headline piece than Simmons being offered in a Bradley Beal trade.
SixersSince82 wrote:Roy The Natural wrote:Exactly. In what way should we expect his value to rise from where it's at now?... The 76ers have been exploring trade options for months. What exactly would trigger a massive leap in Simmons value? If he's not on the court, I don't see a scenario in which his value moves in the direction that Morey would like.
The harsh reality of the regular season as opposed to the false hope filled summer. When the Kings start 2-7, they'll up their offer. Same with some other squads that will likely stink.
But I agree... Ben Simmons playing or sitting isn't going to affect his trade value. (Unless he were to come back and shoot jumpers.)

NYG wrote:I really think unless Beal or Lillard become available, he's staying on the 76ers.
Also for all of his flaws, tell me a better individual headline piece than Simmons being offered in a Bradley Beal trade.

Roy The Natural wrote:SixersSince82 wrote:Roy The Natural wrote:Exactly. In what way should we expect his value to rise from where it's at now?... The 76ers have been exploring trade options for months. What exactly would trigger a massive leap in Simmons value? If he's not on the court, I don't see a scenario in which his value moves in the direction that Morey would like.
The harsh reality of the regular season as opposed to the false hope filled summer. When the Kings start 2-7, they'll up their offer. Same with some other squads that will likely stink.
But I agree... Ben Simmons playing or sitting isn't going to affect his trade value. (Unless he were to come back and shoot jumpers.)
It makes no sense to me. The Kings aren't going to go 2-7 and all of the sudden pony up Fox. It's not going to work like that. When/if these teams struggle, a large reason for that will likely be struggles from players that the 76ers were interested in previously. If Haliburton come out and struggles for 2 months, then the Kings come back around to the trade, are the 76ers even ready to bite that bullet and bank on his rookie season?
I just think there's an extreme amount of naivety when it comes to what's going to happen here. The most likely outcome is still that the 76ers get a an extremely similar package during the season to one they'd get now.
All sorts of other players stock will go up or down. But it's highly unlikely that some team will panic after 8-9 games and dramatically increase the offer that they've no doubt already conversed with Philly about.
Lovetron Joe wrote:the_process wrote:Lovetron Joe wrote:
Pistons offer around Grant, Hayes and Bey. Works on a variety of levels.
I was going to say the Pistons are a new team interested. Any offer with Grant and Bey is a yes.
Both Grant and Bey have Philly backgrounds, are not represented by Klutch, play solid D and can hit the three. Someone like Josh Jackson could make the salaries match.
Detroit builds around Ben and Cunningham. They sell high on Grant who is tight with Embiid.
Roy The Natural wrote:SixersSince82 wrote:Roy The Natural wrote:Exactly. In what way should we expect his value to rise from where it's at now?... The 76ers have been exploring trade options for months. What exactly would trigger a massive leap in Simmons value? If he's not on the court, I don't see a scenario in which his value moves in the direction that Morey would like.
The harsh reality of the regular season as opposed to the false hope filled summer. When the Kings start 2-7, they'll up their offer. Same with some other squads that will likely stink.
But I agree... Ben Simmons playing or sitting isn't going to affect his trade value. (Unless he were to come back and shoot jumpers.)
It makes no sense to me. The Kings aren't going to go 2-7 and all of the sudden pony up Fox. It's not going to work like that. When/if these teams struggle, a large reason for that will likely be struggles from players that the 76ers were interested in previously. If Haliburton come out and struggles for 2 months, then the Kings come back around to the trade, are the 76ers even ready to bite that bullet and bank on his rookie season?
I just think there's an extreme amount of naivety when it comes to what's going to happen here. The most likely outcome is still that the 76ers get a an extremely similar package during the season to one they'd get now.
All sorts of other players stock will go up or down. But it's highly unlikely that some team will panic after 8-9 games and dramatically increase the offer that they've no doubt already conversed with Philly about.
SixersSince82 wrote:Roy The Natural wrote:SixersSince82 wrote:
The harsh reality of the regular season as opposed to the false hope filled summer. When the Kings start 2-7, they'll up their offer. Same with some other squads that will likely stink.
But I agree... Ben Simmons playing or sitting isn't going to affect his trade value. (Unless he were to come back and shoot jumpers.)
It makes no sense to me. The Kings aren't going to go 2-7 and all of the sudden pony up Fox. It's not going to work like that. When/if these teams struggle, a large reason for that will likely be struggles from players that the 76ers were interested in previously. If Haliburton come out and struggles for 2 months, then the Kings come back around to the trade, are the 76ers even ready to bite that bullet and bank on his rookie season?
I just think there's an extreme amount of naivety when it comes to what's going to happen here. The most likely outcome is still that the 76ers get a an extremely similar package during the season to one they'd get now.
All sorts of other players stock will go up or down. But it's highly unlikely that some team will panic after 8-9 games and dramatically increase the offer that they've no doubt already conversed with Philly about.
I agree they likely won't pony up Fox but they'll put Haliburton and picks on the table. Something, that constitutes a better offer than the Reported Hield and Bagley deal. The Kings opening schedule is real tough. And if not them, there will be several other team's who miss their offseason expectations. Every team can't be good.
If you dont think GMs/owners get desperate when their teams continually stink then you haven't watched NBA basketball, lol.
jbk1234 wrote:NYG wrote:I really think unless Beal or Lillard become available, he's staying on the 76ers.
Also for all of his flaws, tell me a better individual headline piece than Simmons being offered in a Bradley Beal trade.
It's been pretty well reported that the Warriors will move every prospect they have and picks for Beal, and if the Wizards trade Beal, they're starting from scratch. There won't be any retooling for the Wizards without Beal. If Beal comes on the market, the only thing that stops him from getting shipped out to GS is Beal saying he won't re-sign there. If he won't commit to GS, then I struggle seeing him committing to Philly.
If Dame becomes available this season (a scenario that is looking less and less likely), then Portland would have to prefer retooling around Simmons and maintaining their current payroll, versus a package with better rebuilding assets. But even if that would be Portland's preference, then I see them insisting on the Sixers adding value.
Roy The Natural wrote:jbk1234 wrote:NYG wrote:I really think unless Beal or Lillard become available, he's staying on the 76ers.
Also for all of his flaws, tell me a better individual headline piece than Simmons being offered in a Bradley Beal trade.
It's been pretty well reported that the Warriors will move every prospect they have and picks for Beal, and if the Wizards trade Beal, they're starting from scratch. There won't be any retooling for the Wizards without Beal. If Beal comes on the market, the only thing that stops him from getting shipped out to GS is Beal saying he won't re-sign there. If he won't commit to GS, then I struggle seeing him committing to Philly.
If Dame becomes available this season (a scenario that is looking less and less likely), then Portland would have to prefer retooling around Simmons and maintaining their current payroll, versus a package with better rebuilding assets. But even if that would be Portland's preference, then I see them insisting on the Sixers adding value.
There were rumors that the Pelicans would move Brandon Ingram for Lillard. I can't see a scenario in which the 76ers can provide a better retool package then the Pelicans or the myriad of other teams that will inevitably throw their hat in the ring.
I think the idea of the 76ers cashing in Simmons+ for a certifiable star above him is pretty much out the window at this point. There's absolutely nothing to suggest that it is a plausibility outside wishful thinking on posters who are perhaps irrationally high on Simmons.
Simmons is a hard player to build around, and at this point he's proven to be extremely fickle as an asset. He's on unnecessary risk for any team hoping to retool. There will be more stable and versatile assets available to a team like Portland in the event that Lillard is moved
Roy The Natural wrote:jbk1234 wrote:NYG wrote:I really think unless Beal or Lillard become available, he's staying on the 76ers.
Also for all of his flaws, tell me a better individual headline piece than Simmons being offered in a Bradley Beal trade.
It's been pretty well reported that the Warriors will move every prospect they have and picks for Beal, and if the Wizards trade Beal, they're starting from scratch. There won't be any retooling for the Wizards without Beal. If Beal comes on the market, the only thing that stops him from getting shipped out to GS is Beal saying he won't re-sign there. If he won't commit to GS, then I struggle seeing him committing to Philly.
If Dame becomes available this season (a scenario that is looking less and less likely), then Portland would have to prefer retooling around Simmons and maintaining their current payroll, versus a package with better rebuilding assets. But even if that would be Portland's preference, then I see them insisting on the Sixers adding value.
There were rumors that the Pelicans would move Brandon Ingram for Lillard. I can't see a scenario in which the 76ers can provide a better retool package then the Pelicans or the myriad of other teams that will inevitably throw their hat in the ring.
I think the idea of the 76ers cashing in Simmons+ for a certifiable star above him is pretty much out the window at this point. There's absolutely nothing to suggest that it is a plausibility outside wishful thinking on posters who are perhaps irrationally high on Simmons.
Simmons is a hard player to build around, and at this point he's proven to be extremely fickle as an asset. He's on unnecessary risk for any team hoping to retool. There will be more stable and versatile assets available to a team like Portland in the event that Lillard is moved
Return to Trades and Transactions