pepe1991 wrote:Isaac hype continues based on nothing.
Come on now. This is just as ridiculous of a statement as the “50/40/90” comment.
Moderators: ChosenSavior, UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass
pepe1991 wrote:Isaac hype continues based on nothing.
pepe1991 wrote:
Isaac hype continues based on nothing. Feels like Gordon hype, but Gordon at least was able to play basketball on a regular basis.
PrimeThyme wrote:pepe1991 wrote:Isaac hype continues based on nothing. Feels like Gordon hype, but Gordon at least was able to play basketball on regular bases.
Isaac was arguably the most impactful defender in the league before his injury during the 2019 season.
It's easy to ignore that fact and focus on shooting percentages, but it's what separates him from all those guys you mentioned. Including AG. His hype isn't based on nothing, && even you were admitting defeat after all the bashing you did before he got injured again.
That's all hindsight though. I have no idea what he will look like once he comes back. If the major injuries he's suffered restrict his mobility and ability to guard 1-5, his value will take a major hit. There's no question though that his trajectory pre-injury was an above-average starting forward with DPOY ability.
AG was always pure potential and what if on both sides of the ball. Isaac is offensively but has already proven his worth on the other end.
Knightro wrote:Xatticus wrote:It doesn't really work that way, or at least the data doesn't suggest that it does. The players for whom the offense is built around get their choice of shots, while everyone else is forced to work around them. Look at Bosh's numbers. You would've expected a spike in efficiency for him when he joined Miami, but it didn't happen.
That isn't exactly what I was saying though.
Going from high usage to low usage, like your Bosh example, provides its own set of challenges that are unique to that situation.
IMO I think transitioning from a player who is forced to work around someone better for shots, and in Isaac's case he's been this type of player for four years now, to a player who gets his choice of shots is a difficult development from an efficiency standpoint.
I would imagine as Isaac's usage goes up, since he's never been anything but a low usage player, his efficiency won't follow suit. At least not right away.
Look at a guy like Jerami Grant. He was a roughly 16% USG 59 TS% guy the last three years. He signs a deal with Detroit and more or less gets free reign (28.5% USG) and his efficiency was the worst it had been in five years.
pepe1991 wrote:PrimeThyme wrote:pepe1991 wrote:Isaac hype continues based on nothing. Feels like Gordon hype, but Gordon at least was able to play basketball on regular bases.
Isaac was arguably the most impactful defender in the league before his injury during the 2019 season.
It's easy to ignore that fact and focus on shooting percentages, but it's what separates him from all those guys you mentioned. Including AG. His hype isn't based on nothing, && even you were admitting defeat after all the bashing you did before he got injured again.
That's all hindsight though. I have no idea what he will look like once he comes back. If the major injuries he's suffered restrict his mobility and ability to guard 1-5, his value will take a major hit. There's no question though that his trajectory pre-injury was an above-average starting forward with DPOY ability.
AG was always pure potential and what if on both sides of the ball. Isaac is offensively but has already proven his worth on the other end.
Matisse Thybulle is probably best all around nba defender and will never be mistaken by elite player.
Isaac was great defender mostly in postion to be rim protector and hidden in offense from any serious responsibility.
Gordon was at least trying to justfy hype and most of the time was failing misserably, but Isaac is guy who's fine by beaing Robin to Dwayne Bacon... (College).
Good defender, overrated all around. Basically our version of Chris Beucher. Blocks shots, can make open shots, average rebounder.