ImageImageImage

Ben Simmons Trade Thread part V

Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan

Philly's Best
Senior
Posts: 598
And1: 101
Joined: Jun 14, 2002
         

Re: Ben Simmons Trade Thread part V 

Post#1861 » by Philly's Best » Tue Oct 5, 2021 11:49 pm

I'd have to guess they thought they could bully the Sixers and NBA to do what they wanted more than they didn't know. A miscalculation of their influence and maybe teams and NBA overall disdain for them and their methodology.
I don't care what people think. People are stupid.
Charles Barkley
Tomjas
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,878
And1: 3,174
Joined: Nov 04, 2017

Re: Ben Simmons Trade Thread part V 

Post#1862 » by Tomjas » Tue Oct 5, 2021 11:51 pm

Show up & get paid millions or sit at home & watch your money get flushed down the drain

Tough decision :banghead:
DCasey91
General Manager
Posts: 9,538
And1: 5,777
Joined: Dec 15, 2020
   

Re: Ben Simmons Trade Thread part V 

Post#1863 » by DCasey91 » Tue Oct 5, 2021 11:55 pm

ExplosionsInDaSky wrote:
DCasey91 wrote:I think we should have drafted Mcbride and Ayo over Springer. Both look likely types and have better skillsets. Age aside both of them have NBA positional size down which can’t just be had.


The player we missed out on was Hyland, but I agree, I like those other guys better than I like Springer. We'll see though. I hope I am wrong.


Hyland for me is a wait and see, I’m not fully liking his body type but there is the Jordan Clarkson appeal to him.

Springer gives me flashbacks to Sam Cassell which is his high end outcome possible. Nothing wrong with Cassell

Just that there may be others in the draft that were better options/picks. Cooper/Ayo/Mcbride fits the wheelhouse better of what we need.
Li WenWen is the GOAT
BullyKing
Forum Mod - 76ers
Forum Mod - 76ers
Posts: 13,441
And1: 14,114
Joined: Jan 16, 2014

Re: Ben Simmons Trade Thread part V 

Post#1864 » by BullyKing » Tue Oct 5, 2021 11:56 pm

Philly's Best wrote:I'd have to guess they thought they could bully the Sixers and NBA to do what they wanted more than they didn't know. A miscalculation of their influence and maybe teams and NBA overall disdain for them and their methodology.


I think they are just stupid and assumed the new team would forgive everything without realizing its the Sixers who would have to do this. But Simmons could still refuse to report to a new team unless the Sixers agreed to forgive the fines as part of the trade. I assume their willingness to do so would depend on the return and things like if this would push them back over the tax.
NYSixersFan wrote:
the plan is to get as good as quickly as possible....I fully believe we could have been a borderline playoff team last year by adding young veterans....using or draft picks and cap space.....can I specifically tell you who? no.
User avatar
Stanford
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 53,709
And1: 18,962
Joined: Feb 07, 2005
Location: Parts Unknown
   

Re: Ben Simmons Trade Thread part V 

Post#1865 » by Stanford » Wed Oct 6, 2021 12:00 am

I don't think I buy any of the narratives leaked about this situation, pro-Ben or pro-Sixers. I think it's all just bull until something happens.
Sixerscan
Senior Mod - 76ers
Senior Mod - 76ers
Posts: 33,946
And1: 16,328
Joined: Jan 25, 2005

Re: Ben Simmons Trade Thread part V 

Post#1866 » by Sixerscan » Wed Oct 6, 2021 12:04 am

BullyKing wrote:
Philly's Best wrote:I'd have to guess they thought they could bully the Sixers and NBA to do what they wanted more than they didn't know. A miscalculation of their influence and maybe teams and NBA overall disdain for them and their methodology.


I think they are just stupid and assumed the new team would forgive everything without realizing its the Sixers who would have to do this. But Simmons could still refuse to report to a new team unless the Sixers agreed to forgive the fines as part of the trade. I assume their willingness to do so would depend on the return and things like if this would push them back over the tax.


Sounds like Klutch gave him bad advice and they should pay Simmons the difference.

Of course he still has the potential of his trade kicker, may be able to use the threat of that (which could blow up a trade) to get paid.

At every turn, league insiders have gossiped about what the next angle might be to leak from Simmons' camp to the media. Each successive leak has been met with eye rolls in some circles — the Sixers trying to trade him for a superior player in James Harden, for example, was not viewed by any reasonable party as an indictment of how they've treated him. Doc Rivers' comments after Game 7 and Joel Embiid's imperfect fit with Simmons were floated next, met with the observation that Rivers has been his biggest booster (internally and externally) and that the Embiid pairing has led to lets of winning and strong data points in favor of the duo.


lol
DCasey91
General Manager
Posts: 9,538
And1: 5,777
Joined: Dec 15, 2020
   

Re: Ben Simmons Trade Thread part V 

Post#1867 » by DCasey91 » Wed Oct 6, 2021 12:07 am

Stanford wrote:I don't think I buy any of the narratives leaked about this situation, pro-Ben or pro-Sixers. I think it's all just bull until something happens.


I think both parties are losing atm. We don’t have a capable team and Ben’s camp is losing monetary and player value by the day. It’s not good a look if you want to invest him long term there’s risks involved and that’s not even getting into his huge flaws in his game.

Both have brought it onto themselves so there’s no “winner” to me.

Sometimes it’s much better to short the option then try to max out sinking value. The market will just pass by
Li WenWen is the GOAT
BullyKing
Forum Mod - 76ers
Forum Mod - 76ers
Posts: 13,441
And1: 14,114
Joined: Jan 16, 2014

Re: Ben Simmons Trade Thread part V 

Post#1868 » by BullyKing » Wed Oct 6, 2021 12:07 am

Sixerscan wrote:
BullyKing wrote:
Philly's Best wrote:I'd have to guess they thought they could bully the Sixers and NBA to do what they wanted more than they didn't know. A miscalculation of their influence and maybe teams and NBA overall disdain for them and their methodology.


I think they are just stupid and assumed the new team would forgive everything without realizing its the Sixers who would have to do this. But Simmons could still refuse to report to a new team unless the Sixers agreed to forgive the fines as part of the trade. I assume their willingness to do so would depend on the return and things like if this would push them back over the tax.


Sounds like Klutch gave him bad advice and they should pay Simmons the difference.

Of course he still has the potential of his trade kicker, may be able to use the threat of that (which could blow up a trade) to get paid.

At every turn, league insiders have gossiped about what the next angle might be to leak from Simmons' camp to the media. Each successive leak has been met with eye rolls in some circles — the Sixers trying to trade him for a superior player in James Harden, for example, was not viewed by any reasonable party as an indictment of how they've treated him. Doc Rivers' comments after Game 7 and Joel Embiid's imperfect fit with Simmons were floated next, met with the observation that Rivers has been his biggest booster (internally and externally) and that the Embiid pairing has led to lets of winning and strong data points in favor of the duo.


lol


His trade kicker isn't really a thing. The kicker can't be used to violate the max salary that the player is otherwise eligible for. Given that his contractual increase was more than the increase in the overall cap, I don't think his kicker actually exists right now for all practical purposes. If it does at all, its a miniscule amount.
NYSixersFan wrote:
the plan is to get as good as quickly as possible....I fully believe we could have been a borderline playoff team last year by adding young veterans....using or draft picks and cap space.....can I specifically tell you who? no.
BullyKing
Forum Mod - 76ers
Forum Mod - 76ers
Posts: 13,441
And1: 14,114
Joined: Jan 16, 2014

Re: Ben Simmons Trade Thread part V 

Post#1869 » by BullyKing » Wed Oct 6, 2021 12:08 am

Stanford wrote:I don't think I buy any of the narratives leaked about this situation, pro-Ben or pro-Sixers. I think it's all just bull until something happens.


Yeah, I can't say that's an unfair viewpoint. Nevertheless, I enjoy reading the pro-Sixers ones more.
NYSixersFan wrote:
the plan is to get as good as quickly as possible....I fully believe we could have been a borderline playoff team last year by adding young veterans....using or draft picks and cap space.....can I specifically tell you who? no.
Sixerscan
Senior Mod - 76ers
Senior Mod - 76ers
Posts: 33,946
And1: 16,328
Joined: Jan 25, 2005

Re: Ben Simmons Trade Thread part V 

Post#1870 » by Sixerscan » Wed Oct 6, 2021 12:09 am

BullyKing wrote:
Sixerscan wrote:
BullyKing wrote:
I think they are just stupid and assumed the new team would forgive everything without realizing its the Sixers who would have to do this. But Simmons could still refuse to report to a new team unless the Sixers agreed to forgive the fines as part of the trade. I assume their willingness to do so would depend on the return and things like if this would push them back over the tax.


Sounds like Klutch gave him bad advice and they should pay Simmons the difference.

Of course he still has the potential of his trade kicker, may be able to use the threat of that (which could blow up a trade) to get paid.

At every turn, league insiders have gossiped about what the next angle might be to leak from Simmons' camp to the media. Each successive leak has been met with eye rolls in some circles — the Sixers trying to trade him for a superior player in James Harden, for example, was not viewed by any reasonable party as an indictment of how they've treated him. Doc Rivers' comments after Game 7 and Joel Embiid's imperfect fit with Simmons were floated next, met with the observation that Rivers has been his biggest booster (internally and externally) and that the Embiid pairing has led to lets of winning and strong data points in favor of the duo.


lol


His trade kicker isn't really a thing. The kicker can't be used to violate the max salary that the player is otherwise eligible for. Given that his contractual increase was more than the increase in the overall cap, I don't think his kicker actually exists right now for all practical purposes. If it does at all, its a miniscule amount.

Yeah I didn't think about that good point.
Tomjas
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,878
And1: 3,174
Joined: Nov 04, 2017

Re: Ben Simmons Trade Thread part V 

Post#1871 » by Tomjas » Wed Oct 6, 2021 12:12 am

Sixerscan wrote:
BullyKing wrote:
Sixerscan wrote:
Sounds like Klutch gave him bad advice and they should pay Simmons the difference.

Of course he still has the potential of his trade kicker, may be able to use the threat of that (which could blow up a trade) to get paid.



lol


His trade kicker isn't really a thing. The kicker can't be used to violate the max salary that the player is otherwise eligible for. Given that his contractual increase was more than the increase in the overall cap, I don't think his kicker actually exists right now for all practical purposes. If it does at all, its a miniscule amount.

Yeah I didn't think about that good point.


Last time I checked it was only a few hundred k

He’s lost more than that in fines already
BullyKing
Forum Mod - 76ers
Forum Mod - 76ers
Posts: 13,441
And1: 14,114
Joined: Jan 16, 2014

Re: Ben Simmons Trade Thread part V 

Post#1872 » by BullyKing » Wed Oct 6, 2021 12:12 am

Sixerscan wrote:
BullyKing wrote:
Sixerscan wrote:
Sounds like Klutch gave him bad advice and they should pay Simmons the difference.

Of course he still has the potential of his trade kicker, may be able to use the threat of that (which could blow up a trade) to get paid.



lol


His trade kicker isn't really a thing. The kicker can't be used to violate the max salary that the player is otherwise eligible for. Given that his contractual increase was more than the increase in the overall cap, I don't think his kicker actually exists right now for all practical purposes. If it does at all, its a miniscule amount.

Yeah I didn't think about that good point.


Decent chance Klutch overlooked that fact too.
NYSixersFan wrote:
the plan is to get as good as quickly as possible....I fully believe we could have been a borderline playoff team last year by adding young veterans....using or draft picks and cap space.....can I specifically tell you who? no.
User avatar
Stanford
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 53,709
And1: 18,962
Joined: Feb 07, 2005
Location: Parts Unknown
   

Re: Ben Simmons Trade Thread part V 

Post#1873 » by Stanford » Wed Oct 6, 2021 12:15 am

Imagine losing 30 million bucks on purpose. Holy ****
Tomjas
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,878
And1: 3,174
Joined: Nov 04, 2017

Re: Ben Simmons Trade Thread part V 

Post#1874 » by Tomjas » Wed Oct 6, 2021 12:15 am

BullyKing wrote:
Sixerscan wrote:
BullyKing wrote:
His trade kicker isn't really a thing. The kicker can't be used to violate the max salary that the player is otherwise eligible for. Given that his contractual increase was more than the increase in the overall cap, I don't think his kicker actually exists right now for all practical purposes. If it does at all, its a miniscule amount.

Yeah I didn't think about that good point.


Decent chance Klutch overlooked that fact too.


Doubt it as it has been well publicised
NYSixersFan
Analyst
Posts: 3,340
And1: 1,805
Joined: May 21, 2014
       

Re: Ben Simmons Trade Thread part V 

Post#1875 » by NYSixersFan » Wed Oct 6, 2021 12:37 am

No interest in LeVert, but I am warming up to the idea of Brogdon
NYSixersFan
Analyst
Posts: 3,340
And1: 1,805
Joined: May 21, 2014
       

Re: Ben Simmons Trade Thread part V 

Post#1876 » by NYSixersFan » Wed Oct 6, 2021 12:40 am

Brogdon, Lamb and a 1st rd pick for Simmons.....then use Lamb's expiring contract plus draft picks to get a starting caliber SF
Skates
Head Coach
Posts: 7,311
And1: 3,855
Joined: Feb 18, 2008
       

Re: Ben Simmons Trade Thread part V 

Post#1877 » by Skates » Wed Oct 6, 2021 12:48 am

A healthy Brogdon and Levert would be a great return, but both have a history of not being that a lot of the time, especially Brogdon, he is like the Embiid of point guards.

Now Brogdon and we can turn one of Turner or Sabonis into something(s) useful from a third team, that could be tasty.

I still want Haliburton and filler more than anyone short of Dame or Beal, could live with the right package built around Sexton (i.e. not Love) and a package from the Raptors could be sneaky good built around OG Anunuboy, Flynn and a PG (with picks aplenty if the PG is Dragic).

Still a matter of waiting and being patient, Simmons isn't going anywhere of his own volition and Morey has zero reason to cave just to make him happy at this point, and I think a lot of the league at large are quietly behind him on that, Silver included.
User avatar
stormi
General Manager
Posts: 8,850
And1: 9,252
Joined: Jun 04, 2019
Location: Kon FC Headquarters
     

Re: Ben Simmons Trade Thread part V 

Post#1878 » by stormi » Wed Oct 6, 2021 12:50 am

Caris Lehurt cope in here? I'll be back tomorrow.
Black Mage
Head Coach
Posts: 6,077
And1: 5,733
Joined: Feb 24, 2017
       

Re: Ben Simmons Trade Thread part V 

Post#1879 » by Black Mage » Wed Oct 6, 2021 12:52 am

https://www.phillyvoice.com/sixers-ben-simmons-standoff-hold-out-trade-demand-fines-rich-paul-latest-news/

I think the biggest thing to take away from Kyle's article is:

A source familiar with the conversations between Simmons' camp and the Sixers told PhillyVoice that the only consistent or clear message this offseason was about the accelerated timeline Simmons has been evaluated on compared to other No. 1 overall picks. In most instances, agent Rich Paul and others have pointed out, top picks are sent to bad teams where they can figure out who they are and how their career is going to play out. Having missed his first year out of LSU due to injury, Simmons joined Embiid to form a partnership capable of winning 50 games right away, and the Sixers have been considered contenders (or at least pseudo contenders) at various points during the last three seasons, increasing scrutiny on his development.


Good god.
eyeatoma
RealGM
Posts: 29,958
And1: 13,210
Joined: Feb 25, 2005
     

Re: Ben Simmons Trade Thread part V 

Post#1880 » by eyeatoma » Wed Oct 6, 2021 12:53 am

Stanford wrote:I don't think I buy any of the narratives leaked about this situation, pro-Ben or pro-Sixers. I think it's all just bull until something happens.


I mean the report that he won't report has been true so far. We shall see if he maintains that stance when the season starts. The sixers decision to withhold pay also has been true. The trade demands made by Simmons have been verified through Woj, and then by the team.

Return to Philadelphia 76ers