Image ImageImage Image

OT: COVID-19 thread #4

Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10

waffle
RealGM
Posts: 11,350
And1: 1,770
Joined: Jun 07, 2002
Location: Don't question the finger and do respect the black box. That is all.....

Re: OT: COVID-19 thread #4 

Post#1061 » by waffle » Wed Oct 6, 2021 4:03 am

dougthonus wrote:
Stratmaster wrote:But shaming them does, and has, had an impact.


It might in this day and age where the public voice can be amplified so easily (which is ironic, because that's the same problem we're arguing about with facebook). Traditionally, that probably wasn't true nearly as much, but nowadays, you're right that public shaming can do a bit more than it used to due to that ability for the public do virally digitally amplify a message.


I just reread the last page and realized I made a fundamental error. Substitute ETHICAL for Moral. It's more accurate. Morals are more personal, ethics are more societal standards
User avatar
dougthonus
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 58,868
And1: 18,950
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

Re: OT: COVID-19 thread #4 

Post#1062 » by dougthonus » Wed Oct 6, 2021 10:23 am

Dez wrote:I mean the lockdown rules do suck and a lot of this could've been avoided if the government hadn't f***ed up the vaccine rollout.

In the end though I'd much rather minimise the amount of people dying like we have, lockdown for an extended period is still better than dead.


For the anti-authoritarian US based crowd, what is happening in Australia is a tragedy. My view is the culture of the population would determine that.
User avatar
dougthonus
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 58,868
And1: 18,950
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

Re: OT: COVID-19 thread #4 

Post#1063 » by dougthonus » Wed Oct 6, 2021 10:27 am

waffle wrote:
dougthonus wrote:
Stratmaster wrote:But shaming them does, and has, had an impact.


It might in this day and age where the public voice can be amplified so easily (which is ironic, because that's the same problem we're arguing about with facebook). Traditionally, that probably wasn't true nearly as much, but nowadays, you're right that public shaming can do a bit more than it used to due to that ability for the public do virally digitally amplify a message.


I just reread the last page and realized I made a fundamental error. Substitute ETHICAL for Moral. It's more accurate. Morals are more personal, ethics are more societal standards


I agree that corporations have an obligation to act in an ethical manner. FB has clearly crossed that line, but that line also needs to be more clearly defined, regulated, and enforced.
waffle
RealGM
Posts: 11,350
And1: 1,770
Joined: Jun 07, 2002
Location: Don't question the finger and do respect the black box. That is all.....

Re: OT: COVID-19 thread #4 

Post#1064 » by waffle » Wed Oct 6, 2021 1:44 pm

legislating Fb is going to be a NIGHTMARE. it's going to be a game of whackamole A very rich whackamole

Broadly I am just happy this has come out. People can now start to understand the basic mechanisms of the internet, that much of what is PUSHED towards us is done so with algorithms and that algorithms can be tweaked. And the internet is no longer the Wild Wild West, it's a hyperly sophisticated money making engine

and last thought on ethics and akin to something I said yesterday. If we go to the gas station and have to worry every time that they are acting ethically, that they are not cutting the gas with something else.... or go to the dentist and worry that they are not using expired drugs....or go to the library and wonder if they are selling my digital information....then we are screwed. We assume ALL THE TIME that the people we deal with are behaving ethically, we have to, there's no other way for us to operate at any level of effectiveness.

Now FB had a very real good vs. bad choice. Their own research showed that this choice existed. The speaker on capital hill yesterday talked about this. And they chose the NON ethical option simply because it would make them more money.

Someone who's daughter has died or son has committed suicide is going to sue FB and it will be interesting as the evidence is right there, on their own letterhead so to speak.

If we can't rely on a certain level of ethical behavior (not legal adherence, laws cannot cover everything and are by their nature REACTIVE) society stops working
waffle
RealGM
Posts: 11,350
And1: 1,770
Joined: Jun 07, 2002
Location: Don't question the finger and do respect the black box. That is all.....

Re: OT: COVID-19 thread #4 

Post#1065 » by waffle » Wed Oct 6, 2021 2:00 pm

which of course is one of the most worrying things about the internet and jan 6.

Those people were 100% sure they were in the right. but they were led there by the great orange one and, as has been now made clear, the nature of the internet is to push people to extremes, mostly people with a predisposition to that.

I said about 5 pages ago that people like that are just more valuable and that is what the speaker confirmed yesterday. They are a desirable commodity. STRONG emotions = Big Profits. Consequences? What consequences? Oh THOSE consequences!

It is probably impossible to reign this in. This will, I think, be part of the internet, the ability to find, or be driven to, like minded people and then to simmer, stew and reduce to a more refined sense of inequity. sometimes it will boil over

My hope? The next generation has grown up with an understanding that the Internet is more like broadcast T.V. in the 1970's. It's there to watch, and sometimes there's something good on, but mostly it's just crap to pass the time.
Almost Retired
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,657
And1: 902
Joined: Oct 07, 2020
       

Re: OT: COVID-19 thread #4 

Post#1066 » by Almost Retired » Wed Oct 6, 2021 7:54 pm

Mods. Might want to throw the kill switch on the Covid thread.
User avatar
dougthonus
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 58,868
And1: 18,950
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

Re: OT: COVID-19 thread #4 

Post#1067 » by dougthonus » Wed Oct 6, 2021 8:14 pm

Almost Retired wrote:Mods. Might want to throw the kill switch on the Covid thread.


Agree that it certainly has gone astray.

Let's move the topic back towards COVID and not Facebook's moral/ethical standing.
Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,306
And1: 6,691
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: OT: COVID-19 thread #4 

Post#1068 » by Dresden » Wed Oct 6, 2021 9:08 pm

dougthonus wrote:
Almost Retired wrote:Mods. Might want to throw the kill switch on the Covid thread.


Agree that it certainly has gone astray.

Let's move the topic back towards COVID and not Facebook's moral/ethical standing.


Ok, not exactly Covid, but vaccine related: the WHO today approved for use the first ever malaria vaccine. Apparently it has to be administered when you are under 2 years of age, and requires a series of 4 injections. But it is a major breakthrough in a disease that has probably killed more humans than all wars put together.
waffle
RealGM
Posts: 11,350
And1: 1,770
Joined: Jun 07, 2002
Location: Don't question the finger and do respect the black box. That is all.....

Re: OT: COVID-19 thread #4 

Post#1069 » by waffle » Wed Oct 6, 2021 10:46 pm

dougthonus wrote:
Almost Retired wrote:Mods. Might want to throw the kill switch on the Covid thread.


Agree that it certainly has gone astray.

Let's move the topic back towards COVID and not Facebook's moral/ethical standing.


but, the discussion, not surprisingly, moved to why people are anti vax. And I laid out, before the finding about FB, why the internet is the likely the source, or certainly the enabler, of those people's POV. And how it is NOT accidental but profit driven. They are 1000% related.

Do you not recognize that? really?

Bit of a cause and effect kind of relationship, eh?

If we don't recognize and accept the relationship then we are just spinning our wheels.

I am, actually, rather shocked if this seems off topic to you
User avatar
dougthonus
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 58,868
And1: 18,950
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

Re: OT: COVID-19 thread #4 

Post#1070 » by dougthonus » Wed Oct 6, 2021 11:24 pm

waffle wrote:
dougthonus wrote:
Almost Retired wrote:Mods. Might want to throw the kill switch on the Covid thread.


Agree that it certainly has gone astray.

Let's move the topic back towards COVID and not Facebook's moral/ethical standing.


but, the discussion, not surprisingly, moved to why people are anti vax. And I laid out, before the finding about FB, why the internet is the likely the source, or certainly the enabler, of those people's POV. And how it is NOT accidental but profit driven. They are 1000% related.

Do you not recognize that? really?

Bit of a cause and effect kind of relationship, eh?

If we don't recognize and accept the relationship then we are just spinning our wheels.

I am, actually, rather shocked if this seems off topic to you


It's like arguing about Trump in this thread earlier which also got shut down repeatedly. This isn't a general OT thread for any political things, if you want that, feel free to go to the CA forum where that is on topic.

What you're talking about is tangentially related, and you've certainly made your point about FB, but arguing about FB extensively isn't COVID related, and you (and I previously) were repeating the same things ad nausem.
waffle
RealGM
Posts: 11,350
And1: 1,770
Joined: Jun 07, 2002
Location: Don't question the finger and do respect the black box. That is all.....

Re: OT: COVID-19 thread #4 

Post#1071 » by waffle » Wed Oct 6, 2021 11:46 pm

I will stop, I agree I have made my point and I hope my points have made some people here say to themselves "wait a second...."

But they are

100%

related to the covid discussion

and to not STRONGLY recognize that is to put yourself in the position of never understanding what is going on here. There is a lever at work here and the lever is the internet, and the pivot is PROFIT, and the PUSH is an algorithm which folds nicely back into your point, Doug!

and almost nothing I said is "political". I may be a madman, but that doesn't necessarily make me wrong. I speak from an informed mount

Heed my words! Waffle out

P.S. my 17 year old agrees with me
waffle
RealGM
Posts: 11,350
And1: 1,770
Joined: Jun 07, 2002
Location: Don't question the finger and do respect the black box. That is all.....

Re: OT: COVID-19 thread #4 

Post#1072 » by waffle » Thu Oct 7, 2021 1:11 am

and the person who said this should be sidelined....was the primary foil for the discussion? in a perfect world this would be his admission of acceptance, but i am not fool enough to believe that.
User avatar
dougthonus
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 58,868
And1: 18,950
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

Re: OT: COVID-19 thread #4 

Post#1073 » by dougthonus » Thu Oct 7, 2021 11:06 am

To bring this back on topic.

My daughter, in HS, has said half the kids in her school have COVID symptoms and openly talk about it with each other, but no one wants to get tested because the school forces you to be out for 2 weeks so they're all hiding it from all of their parents / teachers and only get tested if their symptoms are bad enough that they can't be hidden.

I've known lots of people suffering from the same thing, symptoms that they might have it, but they don't want to cancel any plans, so they'd rather not get tested so they aren't forced into taking action.
League Circles
RealGM
Posts: 35,587
And1: 10,066
Joined: Dec 04, 2001
       

Re: OT: COVID-19 thread #4 

Post#1074 » by League Circles » Thu Oct 7, 2021 12:51 pm

Great point, but as noted, let's stop the FB talk and move back to COVID talk, if you want to go back to FB talk take it to the CA forum
https://august-shop.com/ - sneakers and streetwear
User avatar
coldfish
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 60,678
And1: 37,997
Joined: Jun 11, 2004
Location: Right in the middle
   

Re: OT: COVID-19 thread #4 

Post#1075 » by coldfish » Thu Oct 7, 2021 1:34 pm

Posted this on the CA board but appropriate here:

Immunity from Pfizer's Covid-19 vaccine wanes, studies show
The immune protection offered by two doses of Pfizer's Covid-19 vaccine drops off after two months or so, although protection against severe disease, hospitalization and death remains strong, according to two real-world studies published Wednesday.
The studies -- from Israel and Qatar and published in the New England Journal of Medicine -- support arguments that even fully vaccinated people need to maintain precautions against infection.

...

The study also indicated that immunity for people who get vaccinated after natural Covid-19 infection lasts longer. It's especially strong for people who recovered from infection and then got vaccinated, the study found.

....

A second study from Qatar looked at actual infections among the highly vaccinated population of that small Gulf nation. People there mostly got Pfizer/BioNTech's vaccine.
The study found protection induced by the Pfizer vaccine "builds rapidly after the first dose, peaks in the first month after the second dose, and then gradually wanes in subsequent months," the research team wrote. "The waning appears to accelerate after the fourth month, to reach a low level of approximately 20% in subsequent months," they added.
Nonetheless, protection against hospitalization and death stayed at above 90%, researchers said.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/10/07/health/us-coronavirus-thursday/index.html

Its funny but there were people online predicting how this was going to work a year and a half ago. The fact that experts and governments seems surprised is concerning.

A lot of the words above are true but misleading. The reality is that the only quick measure of immunity is antibodies and antibody levels fall rapidly. T Cells and B Cells are really hard to measure but they likely last a long time, if not a lifetime. The result is that you can get an infection again (just like every other coronavirus) but the severity is mitigated by the adaptive immune response.

Again, this gets back to the reality that everyone is going to get covid. By most analysis, more than half of americans have already had covid once. Keeping up on vaccination and boosters will make those cases less severe and eventually natural immunity will build to the point where its just a cold . . . just like the other coronaviruses (we think).
User avatar
coldfish
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 60,678
And1: 37,997
Joined: Jun 11, 2004
Location: Right in the middle
   

Re: OT: COVID-19 thread #4 

Post#1076 » by coldfish » Thu Oct 7, 2021 1:44 pm

dougthonus wrote:To bring this back on topic.

My daughter, in HS, has said half the kids in her school have COVID symptoms and openly talk about it with each other, but no one wants to get tested because the school forces you to be out for 2 weeks so they're all hiding it from all of their parents / teachers and only get tested if their symptoms are bad enough that they can't be hidden.

I've known lots of people suffering from the same thing, symptoms that they might have it, but they don't want to cancel any plans, so they'd rather not get tested so they aren't forced into taking action.


I posted this just above but when you read the non publicized studies and data, more than half of the US has already had covid. A recent study had us at 1/3 in December of 2020. 100m+ infections from March 2020 to December 2020.

https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20210826/coronavirus-us-infections-2020

That was before the January spike, the March Alpha wave and the big Delta spike. Some of the estimates for infected people are really, really high.

I had a similar experience as Doug. At my kids' school last November, freaking everyone was sick. A small percentage were getting tested and positive, which was triggering quarantine, which was triggering social pressure to NOT get tested. My kids brought home a "cold" in the middle of that where my son really got wrecked. Myself, my daughter and my wife barely had anything but the 3 of us had a severe "cold" in March where myself and my daughter lost our sense of taste and the fatigue lasted for months. None of us were tested either time.

TLDR: People who are looking at the case counts and think that is even slightly representing the true infection counts are naive or stupid.
Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,306
And1: 6,691
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: OT: COVID-19 thread #4 

Post#1077 » by Dresden » Thu Oct 7, 2021 1:45 pm

dougthonus wrote:To bring this back on topic.

My daughter, in HS, has said half the kids in her school have COVID symptoms and openly talk about it with each other, but no one wants to get tested because the school forces you to be out for 2 weeks so they're all hiding it from all of their parents / teachers and only get tested if their symptoms are bad enough that they can't be hidden.

I've known lots of people suffering from the same thing, symptoms that they might have it, but they don't want to cancel any plans, so they'd rather not get tested so they aren't forced into taking action.


That's very unfortunate. Don't they realize they could be spreading it to others by not getting tested/quarantined? There's also a lot of flu going around- I've had several of my employees out with it recently. And because the symptoms are similar, its easy to think you have one when really you have the other.
Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,306
And1: 6,691
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: OT: COVID-19 thread #4 

Post#1078 » by Dresden » Thu Oct 7, 2021 1:53 pm

coldfish wrote:Posted this on the CA board but appropriate here:

Immunity from Pfizer's Covid-19 vaccine wanes, studies show
The immune protection offered by two doses of Pfizer's Covid-19 vaccine drops off after two months or so, although protection against severe disease, hospitalization and death remains strong, according to two real-world studies published Wednesday.
The studies -- from Israel and Qatar and published in the New England Journal of Medicine -- support arguments that even fully vaccinated people need to maintain precautions against infection.

...

The study also indicated that immunity for people who get vaccinated after natural Covid-19 infection lasts longer. It's especially strong for people who recovered from infection and then got vaccinated, the study found.

....

A second study from Qatar looked at actual infections among the highly vaccinated population of that small Gulf nation. People there mostly got Pfizer/BioNTech's vaccine.
The study found protection induced by the Pfizer vaccine "builds rapidly after the first dose, peaks in the first month after the second dose, and then gradually wanes in subsequent months," the research team wrote. "The waning appears to accelerate after the fourth month, to reach a low level of approximately 20% in subsequent months," they added.
Nonetheless, protection against hospitalization and death stayed at above 90%, researchers said.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/10/07/health/us-coronavirus-thursday/index.html

Its funny but there were people online predicting how this was going to work a year and a half ago. The fact that experts and governments seems surprised is concerning.

A lot of the words above are true but misleading. The reality is that the only quick measure of immunity is antibodies and antibody levels fall rapidly. T Cells and B Cells are really hard to measure but they likely last a long time, if not a lifetime. The result is that you can get an infection again (just like every other coronavirus) but the severity is mitigated by the adaptive immune response.

Again, this gets back to the reality that everyone is going to get covid. By most analysis, more than half of americans have already had covid once. Keeping up on vaccination and boosters will make those cases less severe and eventually natural immunity will build to the point where its just a cold . . . just like the other coronaviruses (we think).


To be fair, there are people on line predicting just about anything, so that fact that a percentage of those predictions come true doesn't really say much.

As someone brought up earlier, the decision was made to rush the dosing in order to get people the full vaccine asap, instead of spacing them out by a few months, which would have produced better long term results. THus the need for a booster.

I suppose there is no way to ever know how many people actually have had Covid, since the antibodies produced when you get a vaccine are the same as when you had Covid. I'm not sure that everyone will eventually get Covid either. If enough people get vaccinated, there's no reason to think it can't be very limited in it's scope, as is measles for instance.
User avatar
coldfish
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 60,678
And1: 37,997
Joined: Jun 11, 2004
Location: Right in the middle
   

Re: OT: COVID-19 thread #4 

Post#1079 » by coldfish » Thu Oct 7, 2021 2:05 pm

Dresden wrote:
coldfish wrote:Posted this on the CA board but appropriate here:

Immunity from Pfizer's Covid-19 vaccine wanes, studies show
The immune protection offered by two doses of Pfizer's Covid-19 vaccine drops off after two months or so, although protection against severe disease, hospitalization and death remains strong, according to two real-world studies published Wednesday.
The studies -- from Israel and Qatar and published in the New England Journal of Medicine -- support arguments that even fully vaccinated people need to maintain precautions against infection.

...

The study also indicated that immunity for people who get vaccinated after natural Covid-19 infection lasts longer. It's especially strong for people who recovered from infection and then got vaccinated, the study found.

....

A second study from Qatar looked at actual infections among the highly vaccinated population of that small Gulf nation. People there mostly got Pfizer/BioNTech's vaccine.
The study found protection induced by the Pfizer vaccine "builds rapidly after the first dose, peaks in the first month after the second dose, and then gradually wanes in subsequent months," the research team wrote. "The waning appears to accelerate after the fourth month, to reach a low level of approximately 20% in subsequent months," they added.
Nonetheless, protection against hospitalization and death stayed at above 90%, researchers said.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/10/07/health/us-coronavirus-thursday/index.html

Its funny but there were people online predicting how this was going to work a year and a half ago. The fact that experts and governments seems surprised is concerning.

A lot of the words above are true but misleading. The reality is that the only quick measure of immunity is antibodies and antibody levels fall rapidly. T Cells and B Cells are really hard to measure but they likely last a long time, if not a lifetime. The result is that you can get an infection again (just like every other coronavirus) but the severity is mitigated by the adaptive immune response.

Again, this gets back to the reality that everyone is going to get covid. By most analysis, more than half of americans have already had covid once. Keeping up on vaccination and boosters will make those cases less severe and eventually natural immunity will build to the point where its just a cold . . . just like the other coronaviruses (we think).


To be fair, there are people on line predicting just about anything, so that fact that a percentage of those predictions come true doesn't really say much.

As someone brought up earlier, the decision was made to rush the dosing in order to get people the full vaccine asap, instead of spacing them out by a few months, which would have produced better long term results. THus the need for a booster.

I suppose there is no way to ever know how many people actually have had Covid, since the antibodies produced when you get a vaccine are the same as when you had Covid. I'm not sure that everyone will eventually get Covid either. If enough people get vaccinated, there's no reason to think it can't be very limited in it's scope, as is measles for instance.


https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-1083-1

To detect reinfections, we measured increases in antibodies to the carboxyl (C)-terminal region of the nucleocapsid protein (NCt)—an immunodominant region of the structural coronavirus capsid protein4—for each seasonal coronavirus. The choice of the antigen, the serological test, the threshold for infection and the specificity and sensitivity of the tests are supplied in the Methods, Extended Data Figs. 1–4 and Supplementary Tables 1–3. A total of 101 events, ranging from 3 to 17 per individual, were classified as coronavirus infections (Table 1 and Fig. 1a). The time to reinfection was calculated only during continuous follow-up periods (connected dots in Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig 1). The reinfection times ranged between 6 and 105 months (Fig. 1b). There was no statistically significant difference between the infection interval lengths of the individual viruses (Kruskal–Wallis test, P = 0.256), even though the number of HCoV-HKU1 infections was low and likely underestimated, most probably because of the low sensitivity of the HKU1-NCt-ELISA (Extended Data Fig. 2).

In a few cases, reinfections occurred as early as 6 months (twice with HCoV-229E and once with HCoV-OC43) and 9 months (once with HCoV-NL63), but reinfections were frequently observed at 12 months (Fig. 1b). For reinfections occurring as early as 6 months, we observed no intermediate reduction in antibodies between infections (Fig. 1b, white circles), but reinfection intervals of more than 6 months did show intermediate reductions between infections (visible as peaks in Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1). The ability to detect short-term reinfections in this study was limited by the sampling interval, which was, at minimum, 3 months. However, no signs of reinfection were observed at the first subsequent follow-up visit after a 3-month interval (Fig. 1b), as only decreases in antibody levels (optical density (OD) fold changes <1.0) were found (Fig. 1c). We, therefore, concluded that, in our data, the earliest time point for reinfection by seasonal coronaviruses was 6 months.


TLDR: People get infected with coronaviruses over and over, with the shortest period being 6 months.

The people who posted that this is going to be how it works out showed clinical studies exactly predicting the above behavior like the one above. To step back, some viruses create antibodies which are sterilizing immunity in the long term like chicken pox or measles. Other viruses, like coronaviruses are "get it and forget it" immunity where you are susceptible to another infection after months.

This was known before covid19 but just not publicized. It is extremely unlikely that the covid19 vaccine acts like a measles vaccine.
User avatar
dougthonus
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 58,868
And1: 18,950
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

Re: OT: COVID-19 thread #4 

Post#1080 » by dougthonus » Thu Oct 7, 2021 2:43 pm

coldfish wrote:TLDR: People get infected with coronaviruses over and over, with the shortest period being 6 months.

The people who posted that this is going to be how it works out showed clinical studies exactly predicting the above behavior like the one above. To step back, some viruses create antibodies which are sterilizing immunity in the long term like chicken pox or measles. Other viruses, like coronaviruses are "get it and forget it" immunity where you are susceptible to another infection after months.

This was known before covid19 but just not publicized. It is extremely unlikely that the covid19 vaccine acts like a measles vaccine.


Seems like your antibodies don't go down to zero though, so even as you get reinfected, after you get the 1st vaccine or get over the 1st infection that your ability to fight it off without serious consequences stays pretty stable.

Return to Chicago Bulls