Zenzibar wrote:xdrta+ wrote:ZB9 wrote:
Those are vaccines that actually provide immunity, and they have been vetted and researched for many decades.
These covid vaccines available in the US are still experiments. None available in the US have even been FDA approved.
The vaccines themselves pose a higher risk to kids than the covid virus itself.
CDC numbers reported that among children 5-17 who had COVID-19, there was 1 death per 174,803 cases.
Pfizer & Moderna trials w/ children showed 1 death per 1,000 vaccinated.
So, California is actually mandating a vaccine w/ a mortality rate 174x higher than the virus.
It's not about "following the science", not at all.
https://www.wellnessdoc.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Evidence-based-information-for-parents-on-the-risk-for-children-of-COVID-19-vs.-the-risk-of-the-vaccines.pdf?fbclid=IwAR0wJoZl40WJUDoH4gDb4G_OiehXuW_fV_YCTXmJApFo8kSqAOe0dqfkoLs
"These covid vaccines available in the US are still experiments. None available in the US have even been FDA approved."
An out and out lie.
"The vaccines themselves pose a higher risk to kids than the covid virus itself."
Another lie.
In fact, your whole post is trash. The figures you claim, apparantly from some random tweet in response to California's announcement, is debunked here.
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/oct/07/tweets/cdc-does-not-show-higher-death-rate-vaccines-covid/
It's nonsense. The federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has not reported data for children showing a higher death rate from COVID-19 vaccines than from COVID-19.
There is no clear evidence that COVID-19 vaccines have caused any deaths in the U.S., according to the CDC.
That line difies logic and why the vaccination resistance is growing due to falsification or subjugation of facts.
For example.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaers-cdc-serious-injuries-deaths-covid-vaccines/
Reports of Serious Injuries After COVID Vaccines Near 112,000, as Pfizer Asks FDA to Green Light Shots for Kids 5 to 11
VAERS data released Friday by the CDC included a total of 778,685 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 16,310 deaths and 111,921 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and Oct. 1, 2021.
By
Megan Redshaw
Every Friday, VAERS makes public all vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date, usually about a week prior to the release date.
The Defender is experiencing censorship on many social channels. Be sure to stay in touch with the news that matters by subscribing to our top news of the day. It's free.
Data released Friday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) showed that between Dec. 14, 2020 and Oct. 1, 2021, a total of 778,685 adverse events following COVID vaccines were reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). The data included a total of 16,310 reports of deaths — an increase of 373 over the previous week.
There were 111,921 reports of serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period — up 6,163 compared with the previous week.
Excluding “foreign reports” filed in VAERS, 593.728 adverse events, including 7,437 deaths and 47,455 serious injuries, were reported in the U.S. between Dec. 14, 2020 and Oct. 1, 2021.
Of the 7,437 U.S. deaths reported as of Oct. 1, 11% occurred within 24 hours of vaccination, 16% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination and 29% occurred in people who experienced an onset of symptoms within 48 hours of being vaccinated.
Yeah...
So the homepage of that is hocking a book "The Real Anthony Fauci". Not discrediting the article you posted - I'm gonna do that following - but you can already see where this is headed.
VAERS is not anywhere near official data. If you even looked at what was linked, they counted suicides, analphylaxis and other unrelated or entirely preventable (by the patient) things. That's why VAERS is not used in any medically sourced things, only in blog posts and clearly slanted writeups. VAERS would only induce specific studies and testing after the fact, however aside from treatable myocarditis and clotting, we are seeing nothing unusual in the COVID vaccines overall performance, and this especially goes for Pfizer. Most of the bullet points they brought up would require a great stretch to trace them back to a mRNA vaccine. Far more likely that underlying conditions were present, which is why everyone should go their doctors first and have a workup before getting vaccinated.
One thing that has very much frustrated me about the media is that this point isnt hammered home as much as it should, but anyways..
The majority of the "blood clotting issues" is a symptom called petechiae. These are common, and especially common in viral infections. Having a localized instance of this is not a big deal, but it's all filed the umbrella of "blood clotting" even though it presents no actual danger and you have a decent shot of finding an instance of it on your body, right now.
Same with myocarditis, as there are more typically underlying concerns (cholesterol, blood pressure, family heart history, etc) as a driving force.
And how could I know all this? Because in actually sterile conditions, the vaccines have not shown a potency towards heart disease, blood clotting, or... suicide. Now VAERS can be useful, especially in the US, because we are overall obese, in poor shape, and have quite a large number of people living in poverty or right about that line, where they cant afford good nutrition. However that has not been the case with COVID, instead you have people who probably had no idea VAERS existed pushing it as if it were an actual study. The truth is that if medical science were truly concerned with these numbers, they'd have brought it up. Its not that some genius anti-vaxxer unlocked something unknown.