Post#820 » by HotelVitale » Thu Oct 14, 2021 4:05 am 
            
            
            I agree that he's constantly learning and hasn't shied away from taking tough stances, and for years I've said that we should give Kyrie another 5-10 years or so to figure out who he really is and what path he's been on. He's a brooder and seems to be constantly searching for things, and he's a black american with indigenous roots so of course he's got a lot of reason to doubt and distrust, especially for something involving the government and medicine. And I really do respect the fact that he's not just looking for easy answers or trying to just go along with one or another crowd.
But at some point you also have to make a judgment about how someone's thinking and acting, and this might be my tipping point for that. I don't care at all that he's skipping basketball--it's his life and we'll barely notice in a few years--and I don't think it's a sign of good 'character' to always follow through on your commitments etc. (That's frankly a little childish and ignores basic critical thinking.) But the pandemic has killed 700k people, it definitely effects poor and POC folks much more, and there's already been mountains of misinformation perpetrated about it, and I'm struggling to find a reason why taking this public stance is commendable. I don't think it matters that much in the long term--maybe I'm naive but don't think thousands of people will follow Kyrie's lead--so I don't want to come down on him or anything, but it's hard to respect him coming to that conclusion.
There are some legit criticisms you can make about vaccine mandates, e.g. they might have a big impact on poorer americans, the motive for many institutions is to 'return to normal' and that means not addressing larger problems again, etc. But helping people not to die or suffer from a strange illness isn't a bad thing and it's definitely not contrary to any tradition of liberation thought that I know of. If Kyrie was generally sort of selfish and didn't seem to have the good of the whole (and especially the global poor) then I could write it off, but my loose take now is that he's reaching here for a reason to be contrary, 'independent,' or apart from the crowd, instead of just making a clear judgment about what the best move is. And in general he maybe seems a little stuck on thinking that being 'free-thinking' means being anti- or contrary. I'll keep editing my opinion as more info comes in, and either way I still think Kyrie might become a pretty good dude down the line.