Moderators: HomoSapien, kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, RedBulls23, Michael Jackson, Ice Man, Tommy Udo 6
Almost Retired wrote:Well Doug, the post was meant to be satirical when viewed in its entirety. It was a final sign off on this thread for me. Lighten up dude. You work too many hours plus you got a family. Go bowling or something.
Almost Retired wrote:
Dice, it was meant to be satirical as my last post on this thread.
micromonkey wrote:Almost Retired wrote:
Dice, it was meant to be satirical as my last post on this thread.
When there is so much other info basically on the same level, the blur between satire and conspiracy is a fine one indeed.
Was the post about Mercks pill being the same as Ivermectin a satire--then later the one about it being instant cancer is satire?
The derpy website with the "one guy" who has world inflation figured out and everyone else is wrong
The video link of the doctor conflating COVID's spike protein with what the vaccines protein?
To be frank--there is just so much idiotic unsupported crap being thrown about--there is no difference in the end.
I see all of it a satire--a big joke on those reading and believing an ounce of it--with about as much truth as the Onion or Babylon Bee.
It's "flood the zone with poop"-- all of it.
I had to come back and see if this thread was still going.dougthonus wrote:waffle wrote:but the impact being there NOW is still a societal impact, right?
Like global warming? The fact that it is still there is a societal impact?
This isn't a case of the known evil, right?
Seems to me?
EDIT - but I am not a smart man, so you can probably ignore me. I'll just whimper in the corner
Seriously, are you okay?
I said I didn't explain myself clearly, re-explained, and you're still going off with four posts later ignoring everything I said complaining about semantics after clarification so you can have a 'gotcha' moment replying with no argument other than straight condescension and veiled insults. You're the bizarro-Almost Retired.
Amenmicromonkey wrote:Almost Retired wrote:
Dice, it was meant to be satirical as my last post on this thread.
When there is so much other info basically on the same level, the blur between satire and conspiracy is a fine one indeed.
Was the post about Mercks pill being the same as Ivermectin a satire--then later the one about it being instant cancer is satire?
The derpy website with the "one guy" who has world inflation figured out and everyone else is wrong
The video link of the doctor conflating COVID's spike protein with what the vaccines protein?
To be frank--there is just so much idiotic unsupported crap being thrown about--there is no difference in the end.
I see all of it a satire--a big joke on those reading and believing an ounce of it--with about as much truth as the Onion or Babylon Bee.
It's "flood the zone with poop"-- all of it.
Dresden wrote:micromonkey wrote:Almost Retired wrote:
Dice, it was meant to be satirical as my last post on this thread.
When there is so much other info basically on the same level, the blur between satire and conspiracy is a fine one indeed.
Was the post about Mercks pill being the same as Ivermectin a satire--then later the one about it being instant cancer is satire?
The derpy website with the "one guy" who has world inflation figured out and everyone else is wrong
The video link of the doctor conflating COVID's spike protein with what the vaccines protein?
To be frank--there is just so much idiotic unsupported crap being thrown about--there is no difference in the end.
I see all of it a satire--a big joke on those reading and believing an ounce of it--with about as much truth as the Onion or Babylon Bee.
It's "flood the zone with poop"-- all of it.
Yes. When you make a moral equivalency between Dr. Fauci and Pol Pot, and do it in all seriousness, it's pretty hard to know when a person is joking and when he is not.
Almost Retired wrote:Dresden wrote:micromonkey wrote:
When there is so much other info basically on the same level, the blur between satire and conspiracy is a fine one indeed.
Was the post about Mercks pill being the same as Ivermectin a satire--then later the one about it being instant cancer is satire?
The derpy website with the "one guy" who has world inflation figured out and everyone else is wrong
The video link of the doctor conflating COVID's spike protein with what the vaccines protein?
To be frank--there is just so much idiotic unsupported crap being thrown about--there is no difference in the end.
I see all of it a satire--a big joke on those reading and believing an ounce of it--with about as much truth as the Onion or Babylon Bee.
It's "flood the zone with poop"-- all of it.
Yes. When you make a moral equivalency between Dr. Fauci and Pol Pot, and do it in all seriousness, it's pretty hard to know when a person is joking and when he is not.
A bad as he was Pol Pot is attributed by most sources as having killed 1.7 - 2.5 Million Cambodians. The progenitors of the SARS 2 coronavirus , be they the scientists who did the gain of function research OR the persons responsible for funding that research directly or indirectly through straw men, will have killed 5 Million by the end of this year through reckless disregard of human life. That is the same standard of culpability as 3rd degree homicide. They knew what they were doing was extremely risky yet they carried on this research and willingly took that risk to the detriment of 5 million killed, millions sickened, economies destroyed. And now there are some reports that fear China is playing around with an even deadlier bug called the Nipah virus that has at least a 30% lethality. This type of research needs to be sanctioned out of existence. As I've said the U.N. should take some action for a change and do something actually useful for mankind. This is a threat to mankind itself. If the UN can't do anything about this type of activity then disband the organization because it has no usefulness considering all the money it's given by member nations.
Stratmaster wrote:I had to come back and see if this thread was still going.
I see you are still poking back at anyone calling you out. I will say it again. You are the one who is off base here, and particularly as you are the decider of what content is being allowed.
But you won't step back and think about that.
All that said... have fun. I will check back periodically to see if this BS is still going on.
Ok. I am going to try once more.dougthonus wrote:Stratmaster wrote:I had to come back and see if this thread was still going.
Well, it has been going for about a year and a half, so I assume it wasn't a big surprise...I see you are still poking back at anyone calling you out. I will say it again. You are the one who is off base here, and particularly as you are the decider of what content is being allowed.
I made a comment to someone, whom four separate times mocked a phrase I corrected and provided an explanation for without acknowledging said explanation or discussing any point relevant to it. Even so, I didn't censor that person in any way (ie, decide what content is relevant).
Much like last time you commented to me in this thread, and I asked you to respond by actually provide some specific, relevant information as to what you are actually talking about but you decided not to, so what is eating you now? That I theorize the pandemic will get better (and used the phrase "hope" not "certainty") and think so because I believe vaccination rate will increase significantly due to government/corporate mandates and improved, delta specific vaccines? Sorry if you think that theory is way off base, feel free to tell me why you think so, you very well may have a great thought that I haven't considered.But you won't step back and think about that.
It is hard to step back and think about something when someone had made a vague, nonsensical comment to you.All that said... have fun. I will check back periodically to see if this BS is still going on.
Given that you have yet to define what BS is or what you object to, fair chance it will be.
Almost Retired wrote:
A bad as he was Pol Pot is attributed by most sources as having killed 1.7 - 2.5 Million Cambodians. The progenitors of the SARS 2 coronavirus , be they the scientists who did the gain of function research OR the persons responsible for funding that research directly or indirectly through straw men, will have killed 5 Million by the end of this year through reckless disregard of human life. That is the same standard of culpability as 3rd degree homicide. They knew what they were doing was extremely risky yet they carried on this research and willingly took that risk to the detriment of 5 million killed, millions sickened, economies destroyed. And now there are some reports that fear China is playing around with an even deadlier bug called the Nipah virus that has at least a 30% lethality. This type of research needs to be sanctioned out of existence. As I've said the U.N. should take some action for a change and do something actually useful for mankind. This is a threat to mankind itself. If the UN can't do anything about this type of activity then disband the organization because it has no usefulness considering all the money it's given by member nations.