Tank World Order 3.0
Moderators: HiJiNX, niQ, Morris_Shatford, DG88, Reeko, lebron stopper, 7 Footer, Duffman100
Tank World Order 3.0
- Pooh_Jeter
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,572
- And1: 9,648
- Joined: Apr 29, 2008
Tank World Order 3.0
Play in for what???
The Raptors are ushering in a new era. This season is entirely about developing OG and Scottie and seeing if the other young pieces have a future here.
There are two Canadians looking like lotto picks and the top 5 has some intriguing talents. Another blue chip talent will further add to the new competitive timeline.
Banchero or Chet for #1?
The Raptors are ushering in a new era. This season is entirely about developing OG and Scottie and seeing if the other young pieces have a future here.
There are two Canadians looking like lotto picks and the top 5 has some intriguing talents. Another blue chip talent will further add to the new competitive timeline.
Banchero or Chet for #1?
alienchild wrote:Again, I hope the basketball gods give us the 14th pick in the draft. I hope OG asks for a trade, Birch signs elsewhere and GTJ signs an offer sheet and Raptors don't match. Frankly Masai is dead to me.
Re: Tank World Order 3.0
- ItsDanger
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,722
- And1: 21,891
- Joined: Nov 01, 2008
Re: Tank World Order 3.0
LOL, couldn't wait until 1 loss at least?
Organization can be defined as an organized body of people with a particular purpose. Not random.
Re: Tank World Order 3.0
- LBJKB24MJ23
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,601
- And1: 21,158
- Joined: Jan 22, 2014
- Location: Bermuda
Re: Tank World Order 3.0
I'm in!
the pre-emptive thread lmao
the pre-emptive thread lmao
raf1995 wrote:I just don’t think he has that kind of potential. I think we will regret not trading him for a haul in a few years when he’s a mid-tier starter with nice playmaking and defense and a shaky jumper.
Re: Tank World Order 3.0
- 720
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,203
- And1: 66,480
- Joined: Nov 01, 2012
- Location: Malton
Re: Tank World Order 3.0
Pooh there is already a tank thread. I can revive that one if you want. I guess you could change the title of this thread to Tank World Order 1.0 (2021-2022) and we can start all over? I'm down for that.
Also, Banchero all the way. Him next to OG and Barnes would be next level. Hardy is interesting too.
Also, Banchero all the way. Him next to OG and Barnes would be next level. Hardy is interesting too.
Re: Tank World Order 3.0
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,565
- And1: 20,432
- Joined: May 19, 2001
Re: Tank World Order 3.0
Bet4Chet
Re: Tank World Order 3.0
- Bruin
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,493
- And1: 38,587
- Joined: Mar 11, 2018
Re: Tank World Order 3.0
Paolo > Chet
The versatility on both ends with Scottie, Paolo, and OG would be absolute madness for years
The versatility on both ends with Scottie, Paolo, and OG would be absolute madness for years
Re: Tank World Order 3.0
- Parataxis
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,912
- And1: 5,304
- Joined: Jan 31, 2010
- Location: Penticton, BC
Re: Tank World Order 3.0
"It's just going to be a one-year tank, not a multi-year process"
-Team Tank last year.
-Team Tank last year.
Re: Tank World Order 3.0
- Parataxis
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,912
- And1: 5,304
- Joined: Jan 31, 2010
- Location: Penticton, BC
Re: Tank World Order 3.0
ItsDanger wrote:LOL, couldn't wait until 1 loss at least?
Eh, let them have their space.
As long as they keep it to the tank threads, and don't try to make every PG/GT into a thread about tanking.
Re: Tank World Order 3.0
- And1+2
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,438
- And1: 10,407
- Joined: Jul 31, 2009
- Location: Toronto
Re: Tank World Order 3.0
Let's just say that if we start losing a ton of games, I
personally won't be complaining...
Fall-o for Paolo!
personally won't be complaining...
Fall-o for Paolo!
Re: Tank World Order 3.0
- 720
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,203
- And1: 66,480
- Joined: Nov 01, 2012
- Location: Malton
Re: Tank World Order 3.0
Parataxis wrote:"It's just going to be a one-year tank, not a multi-year process"
-Team Tank last year.
Re: Tank World Order 3.0
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,260
- And1: 5,415
- Joined: Nov 19, 2010
Re: Tank World Order 3.0
First page real estate!!
And yeah - another year, another hunt for a superstar.
#tWo
And yeah - another year, another hunt for a superstar.
#tWo
Re: Tank World Order 3.0
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,690
- And1: 12,725
- Joined: May 26, 2007
Re: Tank World Order 3.0
I thought you said months ago our core had no upside and that Barnes was a terrible pick over Suggs.
Re: Tank World Order 3.0
- Badonkadonk
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,417
- And1: 11,748
- Joined: Jul 11, 2012
Re: Tank World Order 3.0
I look forward to trolling this thread with cyclical arguments again.
Re: Tank World Order 3.0
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,198
- And1: 19,693
- Joined: Jun 06, 2001
Re: Tank World Order 3.0
Seeing this thread so high on the page made me panac for a second that there might be a serious injury I hadn’t heard about yet.
When will we just change the name of 25 of the 30 teams to the Washington Generals?
Please advise….
Dan G.
Please advise….
Dan G.
Re: Tank World Order 3.0
- LBJKB24MJ23
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,601
- And1: 21,158
- Joined: Jan 22, 2014
- Location: Bermuda
Re: Tank World Order 3.0
Danny1616 wrote:I thought you said months ago our core had no upside and that Barnes was a terrible pick over Suggs.
hence the tank thread. i don't know what more you want from this exercise
raf1995 wrote:I just don’t think he has that kind of potential. I think we will regret not trading him for a haul in a few years when he’s a mid-tier starter with nice playmaking and defense and a shaky jumper.
Re: Tank World Order 3.0
- LBJKB24MJ23
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,601
- And1: 21,158
- Joined: Jan 22, 2014
- Location: Bermuda
Re: Tank World Order 3.0
And1+2 wrote:Let's just say that if we start losing a ton of games, I
personally won't be complaining...
Fall-o for Paolo!
tank-o for paolo
raf1995 wrote:I just don’t think he has that kind of potential. I think we will regret not trading him for a haul in a few years when he’s a mid-tier starter with nice playmaking and defense and a shaky jumper.
Re: Tank World Order 3.0
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,690
- And1: 12,725
- Joined: May 26, 2007
Re: Tank World Order 3.0
LBJKB24MJ23 wrote:Danny1616 wrote:I thought you said months ago our core had no upside and that Barnes was a terrible pick over Suggs.
hence the tank thread. i don't know what more you want from this exercise
I thought OG has no upside and Barnes is a certified bust.
Now it's about developing OG and Barnes?
Shouldn't TWO be advocating to trade OG and Barnes for more draft picks and tank!
Re: Tank World Order 3.0
- 720
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,203
- And1: 66,480
- Joined: Nov 01, 2012
- Location: Malton
Re: Tank World Order 3.0
Danny1616 wrote:LBJKB24MJ23 wrote:Danny1616 wrote:I thought you said months ago our core had no upside and that Barnes was a terrible pick over Suggs.
hence the tank thread. i don't know what more you want from this exercise
I thought OG has no upside and Barnes is a certified bust.
Now it's about developing OG and Barnes?
Shouldn't TWO be advocating to trade OG and Barnes for more draft picks and tank!
This is the type of misplaced logic I expect from Team Mediocre.
Re: Tank World Order 3.0
- 720
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,203
- And1: 66,480
- Joined: Nov 01, 2012
- Location: Malton
Re: Tank World Order 3.0
LBJKB24MJ23 wrote:And1+2 wrote:Let's just say that if we start losing a ton of games, I
personally won't be complaining...
Fall-o for Paolo!
tank-o for paolo
Sadly I don't think we're bad enough to be in that bottom 5, more in that bottom 7-14 range. But with lottery luck you never know.