taikibansei wrote:pilkoids wrote:taikibansei wrote:
People don't realize just how much power players gave up in this current CBA. In exchange for a small bump in salary/revenue sharing, the teams have received broad powers, including enhanced drug testing, and the ability to penalize players severely for what they wear and how they act on (and sometimes off) the court...and even in practice.
That's a pretty darn broad mandate.
So, basically, the NBA appears to be saying that the new CBA gives them greater authority over players...and even if it seems at first reading that their authority has been reduced, that this interpretation is wrong.
Regarding practice and Ben, a sampling:
I am willing to bet money here now that a court will readily find that a prohibition on carrying a cell phone while practicing to be reasonable.
I am willing to bet money here now that a court will readily find that a cell phone is not included in uniform...or sneakers.
Etc., etc. The two documents are well over 500 pages total. Feel free to read them yourselves.
I'm surprised the NBAPA gave in on those.
Players must be thinking that management wouldn't dare risk a PR nightmare by enforcing any of these rules, but then again we have this Ben Simmons situation.
The bold is exactly what I'm thinking. The players wanted the salary bump, and thought (rightfully) that it would take a perfect storm of events before any team would dare risk the public shame--and backlash--probable for being the first to attempt enforcing these new provisions.
And then one day, along came Ben Simmons....
Player association realized that you basically have to be an idiot to get hit with these fines. Simmons cant even do the bare minimum of show up and walk through practice without outright refusing to participate.
It's not on the NBAPA; this is all on Simmons.
































