Manocad wrote:You're creating a strawman. I said being pissed off about it childish, not that having a preference for being told the truth is childish.
"Pissed-off" is obviously a relative term. Displeased, disappointed, angered, the term used doesn't mean much when it is relative.
My point stands as totally rational. A fan is reasonable to be DISPLEASED, ANGERED, Disappointed that they were disrespected by the organization. When that fan expresses that anger IN A PROPER PLACE IN THE REALM OF A SPORTS FAN, there is simply nothing irrational, or childish about this.
I have clearly shown this with rational argument.
The organization is rational to care whether their fans feel comfortable with the way they are being treated by them. The fact that they make revenue from the tv watching public makes this obvious.
It is not irrational nor childish for a fan to
1. Prefer being treated respectfully as opposed to the opposite.
2, if number 1 is true, and it clearly is, then it's not irrational for the disrespected fan to feel angered and/or disappointed toward the organization. So the anger is not childish, and as long as it is expressed in the proper place, the realm of being a sports fan, then nothing about the fans reaction is irrational.
There is no other rational conclusion. You did say your mind could not be changed, meaning you don't care about following rationality, which is irrational in itself, us it not?.
Changing your mind is niether here nor there, all my intent was is to show through rational argument that there is nothing irrational about a fan preferring truth to lies, nor being angered if he receives lies, not nothing irrational as long as he expresses that anger in the proper places. The argument is air tight, opinion is not relevant. You can continue to claim otherwise but without rational argument you position, dare I say it, would appear to be childish.