Image ImageImage Image

Pat Williams Discussion - Out 4-6 Mo (late Feb to late April)

Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10

User avatar
coldfish
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 60,143
And1: 37,052
Joined: Jun 11, 2004
Location: Right in the middle
   

Re: Pat Williams discussion thread 

Post#281 » by coldfish » Tue Oct 26, 2021 8:44 pm

Any long salary the Bulls take on means lux tax for Jerry next year. They are going to want to minimize that. The trade assets going out will likely be Pat, Coby and the Portland 1st. Plus whatever filler is needed.

Say, Grant + Livers + Garza for Coby + Pat + DJJ + Portland 1st.
User avatar
Repeat 3-peat
RealGM
Posts: 14,830
And1: 15,339
Joined: Nov 02, 2013
 

Re: Pat Williams discussion thread 

Post#282 » by Repeat 3-peat » Tue Oct 26, 2021 8:57 pm

I just don't see it with Grant in terms of fit. He clearly wants to be a top scoring option, isn't that efficient and doesn't seem to like passing the basketball.
Image
Wingy
RealGM
Posts: 15,797
And1: 6,605
Joined: Feb 15, 2007

Re: Pat Williams discussion thread 

Post#283 » by Wingy » Tue Oct 26, 2021 9:02 pm

Don't see why Toronto or Detroit wants PW/Coby, etc. for Siakam or Grant. They have some nice young pieces, and you need some strong vets around them to show them how it's done and not have some trash, losing culture where those young pieces learn bad habits, and get accustomed to losing. We're pipe dreaming if we think PW/Coby/DJJ and a pick are getting either of those guys.

For reference, see: Bulls, Chicago - late GarPax era.
fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 68,969
And1: 36,616
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
 

Re: Pat Williams discussion thread 

Post#284 » by fleet » Tue Oct 26, 2021 9:05 pm

Grant seems like a reach for me though. He doesn’t get is out of the East, doesn’t really solve the size problems. Would hate to use all our ammo on that one. The Bulls should wait for the right player to push his way toward the Bulls. We don’t need to do a deal just because we want to do a deal. The good thing about the Bulls now is that there will definitely be a guy that will want to be a part of this
Hold That
RealGM
Posts: 12,504
And1: 838
Joined: Dec 07, 2001
     

Re: Pat Williams discussion thread 

Post#285 » by Hold That » Tue Oct 26, 2021 11:38 pm

I wonder if his ankle is still bothering him. He was originally suppose to come back this week but he miraculously healed early and was back two weeks ago after Green had those impressive pre season games starting.
User avatar
NecessaryEvil
RealGM
Posts: 10,068
And1: 7,477
Joined: Jun 12, 2014
 

Re: Pat Williams discussion thread 

Post#286 » by NecessaryEvil » Tue Oct 26, 2021 11:45 pm

fleet wrote:Grant seems like a reach for me though. He doesn’t get is out of the East, doesn’t really solve the size problems. Would hate to use all our ammo on that one. The Bulls should wait for the right player to push his way toward the Bulls. We don’t need to do a deal just because we want to do a deal. The good thing about the Bulls now is that there will definitely be a guy that will want to be a part of this


i'm curious as to how Jokic felt about J.Grant. Could be helpful in the pursuit.
kodo
RealGM
Posts: 20,531
And1: 14,982
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
Location: Northshore Burbs
 

Re: Pat Williams discussion thread 

Post#287 » by kodo » Tue Oct 26, 2021 11:50 pm

Passing could be a little better. Bulls ran a nice play for him early where he set a screen for Demar, Raps doubled Derozan leaving Pat wide open. Play worked well to get an open corner 3, but Pat took a contested mid range jumper instead (grazed the rim). Lavine is even pointing out where the ball goes next on this play.

Image

I think it's just too early for him. Not every kid is a starter in his 2nd year.
User avatar
FriedRise
RealGM
Posts: 14,446
And1: 13,551
Joined: Jan 13, 2015
Location: Chicago
 

Re: Pat Williams discussion thread 

Post#288 » by FriedRise » Wed Oct 27, 2021 12:55 am

Read on Twitter


He should sit IMO.
Senor Chang
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,270
And1: 1,261
Joined: Jan 26, 2002
Location: Why do you teach Spanish?
Contact:

Re: Pat Williams discussion thread 

Post#289 » by Senor Chang » Wed Oct 27, 2021 1:06 am

Pat is moving like a granny out there. As if he's protecting his ankles. It was clear watching him last night next to Barnes and OG.

Sent from my SM-G965U using RealGM mobile app
wayoftheroad wrote:We’re getting bodied by Moochie Norris lmao
dabig3
Rookie
Posts: 1,076
And1: 204
Joined: Jul 05, 2006
     

Re: Pat Williams discussion thread 

Post#290 » by dabig3 » Wed Oct 27, 2021 3:25 am

FriedRise wrote:
Read on Twitter


He should sit IMO.


Time for Billy to make a coaching decision and just bench him till he's more recovered. Pat needs to focus on his own health and development right now, other guys can step up.

I rather have a healthy, focused, and hungrier Pat for that road trip next month than one still on the mend and playing like s***.
gardenofsound
Veteran
Posts: 2,540
And1: 1,895
Joined: Aug 25, 2010
 

Re: Pat Williams discussion thread 

Post#291 » by gardenofsound » Wed Oct 27, 2021 3:31 am

If the issue is that he's not healthy, then yeah, go with the preseason approach and start Javonte and start running DJJ in the rotation until PW is ready to bang.
User avatar
kulaz3000
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 42,469
And1: 24,624
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: Pat Williams discussion thread 

Post#292 » by kulaz3000 » Wed Oct 27, 2021 4:17 am

gardenofsound wrote:If the issue is that he's not healthy, then yeah, go with the preseason approach and start Javonte and start running DJJ in the rotation until PW is ready to bang.


Billy has had no hesitation to bench Pat when he has made mistakes or seemed to be tired. I think seeing Billy continue to play him over say DJJ or even Bradley for that matter is that, he either doesn’t feel those players are up to speed yet, they don’t know the plays or they aren’t healthy.
Why so serious?
GoBlue72391
RealGM
Posts: 10,280
And1: 6,560
Joined: Oct 26, 2009
     

Re: Pat Williams discussion thread 

Post#293 » by GoBlue72391 » Wed Oct 27, 2021 5:07 am

eierluke wrote:To those, who say that his rebounding/ the lack of doesn't hurt: The Bulls are 29th as a team in rebounding at 41.

Did someone really say his lack of rebounding isn't a problem? Getting 0 rebounds from any position is a problem, let alone from a frontcourt player.
GoBlue72391
RealGM
Posts: 10,280
And1: 6,560
Joined: Oct 26, 2009
     

Re: Pat Williams discussion thread 

Post#294 » by GoBlue72391 » Wed Oct 27, 2021 5:15 am

dabig3 wrote:
FriedRise wrote:
Read on Twitter


He should sit IMO.


Time for Billy to make a coaching decision and just bench him till he's more recovered. Pat needs to focus on his own health and development right now, other guys can step up.

I rather have a healthy, focused, and hungrier Pat for that road trip next month than one still on the mend and playing like s***.

I don't think benching him until he's healthy will solve this or make him hungrier, although I'm not saying we shouldn't do that. To me, this goes beyond physical health. This is a between the ears thing. This is just who he is, healthy or not. Maybe he can change, but it's getting less and less likely.
heir_jordan22
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,406
And1: 325
Joined: Jul 16, 2008
   

Re: Pat Williams discussion thread 

Post#295 » by heir_jordan22 » Wed Oct 27, 2021 6:36 am

fleet wrote:
heir_jordan22 wrote:I think people are overreacting about Pat. 0 rebounds and 3 shot attempts is not good. But this is a second year player who missed the last month (all of preseason) with an injury. The roster is completely reconstructed and he is now playing an entirely different role and basically hasn't practiced with this team. And let's not pretend he's the only one not rebounding. We only had 28 rebounds as a team. That's putrid, and while Pat definitely needs to carry some of the blame for that, he is the second tallest player in our rotation at 6'7". We need more size.

We should NOT bench him for someone who is already on the roster. We need to trade for a bigger PF who is a rebounder and defender. And we definitely should NOT be including Pat in the trade. Obviously DJJ is the guy to trade and possibly include TBJ.

Let's not lose our minds here.

Fair enough, but hes not 6’7”

According to NBA.com, basketballreference.com, Wikipedia, and Google, he is 6'7". Is there a better source that I'm missing?


Edit: RealGM and 2k also list him at 6'7".

Meanwhile, people are calling for Alize to start. Alize is smaller, not as good a defender, not as good a shooter, and had 2 rebounds in 14 minutes against the Raptors. I'm not sure why people would want him to be a starter.
heir_jordan22
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,406
And1: 325
Joined: Jul 16, 2008
   

Re: Pat Williams discussion thread 

Post#296 » by heir_jordan22 » Wed Oct 27, 2021 6:53 am

GoBlue72391 wrote:
heir_jordan22 wrote:I think people are overreacting about Pat. 0 rebounds and 3 shot attempts is not good. But this is a second year player who missed the last month (all of preseason) with an injury. The roster is completely reconstructed and he is now playing an entirely different role and basically hasn't practiced with this team. And let's not pretend he's the only one not rebounding. We only had 28 rebounds as a team. That's putrid, and while Pat definitely needs to carry some of the blame for that, he is the second tallest player in our rotation at 6'7". We need more size.

We should NOT bench him for someone who is already on the roster. We need to trade for a bigger PF who is a rebounder and defender. And we definitely should NOT be including Pat in the trade. Obviously DJJ is the guy to trade and possibly include TBJ.

Let's not lose our minds here.

It's easy to say don't overreact, he's young, raw, and coming off an injury, and that does hold some level of merit. But on the other hand, what player in Bulls history has produced less and had a lower impact on the game than PWill among those who got consistent playing time? Keith Bogans in the only one I can recall, and he was an end-of-the-bench vet who was forced into a limited minutes starter role due to a lack of better fits and had a very defined role of 3&D.

Young or not, he should have shown something by now, and I can count on one hand the number of games where he showed something more than just mere flashes every once in a great while. Forget the Bulls, what young player in recent NBA history produced so little and went on to become a good player? I'm talking about players who actually got consistent playing time from day 1, so guys like Gerald Wallace and Jermaine O'Neal don't count because they barely played for their first few years in the league and I doubt they had the glaring passivity and lack of effort that PWill has shown.

I'm willing to give him more time and acknowledge that he's young, raw, and is making up for a short amount of lost time and is adjusting to new teammates, but he has to start showing something or changes will eventually have to be made.

Willing to give him more time than 4 games? Wow, that's incredibly reasonable of you.

I'm not sure if you guys realize this, but the season just started. Nobody will be traded anytime soon. And a player in the second year of a rookie contract damn sure isn't being traded before Christmas unless he whips a gun out in the locker room.
fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 68,969
And1: 36,616
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
 

Re: Pat Williams discussion thread 

Post#297 » by fleet » Wed Oct 27, 2021 8:29 am

heir_jordan22 wrote:
fleet wrote:
heir_jordan22 wrote:I think people are overreacting about Pat. 0 rebounds and 3 shot attempts is not good. But this is a second year player who missed the last month (all of preseason) with an injury. The roster is completely reconstructed and he is now playing an entirely different role and basically hasn't practiced with this team. And let's not pretend he's the only one not rebounding. We only had 28 rebounds as a team. That's putrid, and while Pat definitely needs to carry some of the blame for that, he is the second tallest player in our rotation at 6'7". We need more size.

We should NOT bench him for someone who is already on the roster. We need to trade for a bigger PF who is a rebounder and defender. And we definitely should NOT be including Pat in the trade. Obviously DJJ is the guy to trade and possibly include TBJ.

Let's not lose our minds here.

Fair enough, but hes not 6’7”

According to NBA.com, basketballreference.com, Wikipedia, and Google, he is 6'7". Is there a better source that I'm missing?


Edit: RealGM and 2k also list him at 6'7".

Meanwhile, people are calling for Alize to start. Alize is smaller, not as good a defender, not as good a shooter, and had 2 rebounds in 14 minutes against the Raptors. I'm not sure why people would want him to be a starter.

Those height listings are not worth the electrons they are printed with. Alize listed 6’8” btw.
CaPiTanAK
Pro Prospect
Posts: 769
And1: 435
Joined: Dec 26, 2020

Re: Pat Williams discussion thread 

Post#298 » by CaPiTanAK » Wed Oct 27, 2021 10:28 am

https://nyboneandjoint.com/blog/how-long-does-it-take-for-a-sprained-shoulder-to-heal/

Give him two weeks off and go from there. But that doesn’t stop him from running suicide sprints all day in order to declog that trash motor that he has.
mack2354
Pro Prospect
Posts: 860
And1: 559
Joined: Jun 03, 2013
       

Re: Pat Williams discussion thread 

Post#299 » by mack2354 » Wed Oct 27, 2021 11:55 am

He's the 5th option. Anyone they traded him for would likely still be a 5th option. The kid just needs to have more confidence that his release is quick enough to not get blocked. He shoots at a really good percentage but he won't shoot unless the nearest defender is 50ft away. I see him pass or put the ball on the floor way too much on wide open looks. This seems like a simple fix. He's not this huge problem that people are making him out to be.

He's stronger and better equipped to guard the bigger PF's than Green, Brown, Jones, or Alize is. Pat also shoots the 3 ball better than all of those guys as well. We are undefeated, he's only 20 yrs old and he's currently our best option on our roster at the position. I'd keep his minutes in the low 20's to reward the 2nd unit guys who are busting their butts to earn minutes.
User avatar
DuckIII
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 70,945
And1: 36,088
Joined: Nov 25, 2003
Location: On my high horse.
     

Re: Pat Williams discussion thread 

Post#300 » by DuckIII » Wed Oct 27, 2021 12:13 pm

coldfish wrote:Any long salary the Bulls take on means lux tax for Jerry next year. They are going to want to minimize that. The trade assets going out will likely be Pat, Coby and the Portland 1st. Plus whatever filler is needed.

Say, Grant + Livers + Garza for Coby + Pat + DJJ + Portland 1st.


I’m on record as supporting a Pat/Grant centered deal. And I don’t believe Coby has a future with this team. But I’d need therapy to resolve the emotional havoc Garza in a Bulls uniform would visit upon me.
Once a pickle, never a cucumber again.

Return to Chicago Bulls