ImageImageImage

Post-Game Notes: WAS 116, BOS 107 (2-3)

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

FlatearthZorro
RealGM
Posts: 20,585
And1: 12,326
Joined: Feb 12, 2010
Location: Somewhere in Boston
     

Re: Post-Game Notes: WAS 116, BOS 107 (2-3) 

Post#101 » by FlatearthZorro » Thu Oct 28, 2021 10:17 am

Larry_Russell wrote:My god we as fans are pathetic.

New coach
Roster overhaul
Positional changes


And people bitching relentlessless and pointing blame on individual players.

It has been 5 games.


5 games


This is such a tired narrative. We just haven't looked good- our coach looks lost, Smart has been complete trash(useless basically), Brown and Tatum have been on and off. It's facts, not just making something up.
Good assessment:

PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.
jfs1000d
RealGM
Posts: 28,046
And1: 14,870
Joined: Jun 25, 2004

Re: Post-Game Notes: WAS 116, BOS 107 (2-3) 

Post#102 » by jfs1000d » Thu Oct 28, 2021 10:35 am

I don’t like how the ball isn’t in the ha fe if Tatum enough.

That said, hate the defense mods. We made Harrell look like Karl Malone.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
ballup
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,965
And1: 3,527
Joined: Dec 08, 2013
 

Re: Post-Game Notes: WAS 116, BOS 107 (2-3) 

Post#103 » by ballup » Thu Oct 28, 2021 11:07 am

Was only able to catch the 2nd half. A couple of tough floaters by Holiday and pull up 3s by Dinwiddie sealed it.

Schroeder has become better and showed a bit of Rondo-ness during his drives.

We have to come to reality that this team isn't a bonafide top 4 in the east. The middle of the pack in the east has gotten better and we can't expect easy wins outside of the bottom feeders.

Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk
User avatar
The_Ghost_of_JB
RealGM
Posts: 22,559
And1: 18,644
Joined: Mar 04, 2010
Location: In a van down by the river.
   

Re: Post-Game Notes: WAS 116, BOS 107 (2-3) 

Post#104 » by The_Ghost_of_JB » Thu Oct 28, 2021 12:23 pm

I don't understand why smart continues to get a pass for his shooting either. Just because he makes "winning plays" people just completely forget about his horrendous shooting throughout the game.

I think if this was any other player shooting this poorly they'd be all over them yet it's okay for Smart to shoot 25%.
*Insert witty signature here.*
User avatar
Fierce1
RealGM
Posts: 19,195
And1: 16,524
Joined: Jan 31, 2021
   

Re: Post-Game Notes: WAS 116, BOS 107 (2-3) 

Post#105 » by Fierce1 » Thu Oct 28, 2021 12:49 pm

Milwaukee was the #1 seed and favorites to end up in the Finals in 2019.
But they got bounced by Toronto.

The following season, Miami basically swept them in the semis.

It was only when the Bucks got rid of Bledsoe and went all in on Jrue that the Bucks were able to get to the Finals and win a championship.

Same thing with the Suns.
The Suns weren't even a playoff team in 2020.

In 2021 they made it to the Finals.
And the reason for that is the addition of a star PG, CP3.

A talented team with multiple star players can get away with having a PG like Derek Fisher.
But there's just no way a team can be a championship team if the starting PG is just shooting 25.5% from the field.

It's time to wake up.

Marcus Smart has only shot 40%, or better, once his entire NBA career!
This is Smart's 8th season.

If Ime or Brad doesn't have the guts to do something about Smart, the Celts will become the Blazers of the east.

Udoka needs to limit Smart 28 minutes per game, off the bench.

Even better if Brad can package Smart with some of the young players and draft picks for real starting Guard.
radcot
General Manager
Posts: 7,745
And1: 11,466
Joined: May 07, 2012
 

Re: Post-Game Notes: WAS 116, BOS 107 (2-3) 

Post#106 » by radcot » Thu Oct 28, 2021 1:14 pm

Really wanted the Celtics to pick up Harrell this off-season. He is a fierce competitor and a beast in the paint. He killed us in this game. Can't understand why he hasn't stuck with one team. As to the C's, they obviously have not looked good so far and that's disappointing, but I'm still optimistic that things will come together. Brown will recover greater consistency. He's too good not to. Smart is clearly not right physically. He's not a good shooter, but he's not 16 per cent bad. Got to get Pritch and Nee more minutes. We need their shooting.
darrendaye
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 17,043
And1: 10,058
Joined: May 06, 2001
Location: Pollard Powered, in Yonkers, NY
     

Re: Post-Game Notes: WAS 116, BOS 107 (2-3) 

Post#107 » by darrendaye » Thu Oct 28, 2021 1:16 pm

Read on Twitter
Baylor is Brat.
Triple7
RealGM
Posts: 12,606
And1: 9,511
Joined: Aug 23, 2018
 

Re: Post-Game Notes: WAS 116, BOS 107 (2-3) 

Post#108 » by Triple7 » Thu Oct 28, 2021 1:16 pm

Fierce1 wrote:Milwaukee was the #1 seed and favorites to end up in the Finals in 2019.
But they got bounced by Toronto.

The following season, Miami basically swept them in the semis.

It was only when the Bucks got rid of Bledsoe and went all in on Jrue that the Bucks were able to get to the Finals and win a championship.

Same thing with the Suns.
The Suns weren't even a playoff team in 2020.

In 2021 they made it to the Finals.
And the reason for that is the addition of a star PG, CP3.

A talented team with multiple star players can get away with having a PG like Derek Fisher.
But there's just no way a team can be a championship team if the starting PG is just shooting 25.5% from the field.

It's time to wake up.

Marcus Smart has only shot 40%, or better, once his entire NBA career!
This is Smart's 8th season.

If Ime or Brad doesn't have the guts to do something about Smart, the Celts will become the Blazers of the east.

Udoka needs to limit Smart 28 minutes per game, off the bench.

Even better if Brad can package Smart with some of the young players and draft picks for real starting Guard.


I don’t think Ime has it in him to play the right players for us to win. Steve Kerr did that. Benching David Lee, a former all nba, all star player still in his prime, for an up and coming Draymond Green. He knew that was the best for the team, disregarding if feeling would get hurt. After that, they took off as a team. Smart needs to go to the bench. He doesn’t need to play on closing minutes, if he is playing bad. Ime should have the guts to do that. I don’t care what he says after. All of that are cheap talks and no action. If we are losing despite a better roster, to weaker teams, then there is a problem with lineups and rotations. Try sonething different.
Triple7
RealGM
Posts: 12,606
And1: 9,511
Joined: Aug 23, 2018
 

Re: Post-Game Notes: WAS 116, BOS 107 (2-3) 

Post#109 » by Triple7 » Thu Oct 28, 2021 1:18 pm

darrendaye wrote:
Read on Twitter


Never really recovered from covid is bull ****. The guy scored 60 after covid. He played in the olympics lol. It’s definitely not that.
User avatar
GoCeltics123
RealGM
Posts: 17,440
And1: 33,362
Joined: May 05, 2015
         

Re: Post-Game Notes: WAS 116, BOS 107 (2-3) 

Post#110 » by GoCeltics123 » Thu Oct 28, 2021 1:38 pm

eyeatoma wrote:
Triple7 wrote:Fire ImE already. That guy doesn’t know what he’s doing. We should have traded Smart. Dennis and Marcus together won’t work. Not enough shooters to finish games.



As I sixers fan I came in when you guys hired him, warning you all that he wasn't this great coach, and his defensive schemes (which included Horford) where mind bogglingly bad. Now hopefully some of you can see my point. Still think he's a better coach than Glenn Rivers though lol.

I mean, he's citing that Dennis and Smart hasn't worked when it's statistically been part of our best lineup, so flexing your muscle about Ime on that note is dumb dude
User avatar
The_Ghost_of_JB
RealGM
Posts: 22,559
And1: 18,644
Joined: Mar 04, 2010
Location: In a van down by the river.
   

Re: Post-Game Notes: WAS 116, BOS 107 (2-3) 

Post#111 » by The_Ghost_of_JB » Thu Oct 28, 2021 1:46 pm

Smart stars
7-4-4 25% shooting

Dennis schroder
16-4-6 40% shooting.

I'm sure some people will pull some advanced stats nonsense but looking at the difference between the two why would smart continue to start? If you have a guy that is a better shooter and equal rebounder and a better distributor why would you not start him considering how many times this team has a slow start?
*Insert witty signature here.*
FeedReed
Starter
Posts: 2,307
And1: 839
Joined: Jan 17, 2006

Re: Post-Game Notes: WAS 116, BOS 107 (2-3) 

Post#112 » by FeedReed » Thu Oct 28, 2021 2:28 pm

Shak_Celts wrote:
GoGreen wrote:I thought JT had this moments keeping this team in the game, but he is far from a leader. Disappeared in the do 4th. Smart annoyed me per usual.

Tonight was a gut check for Jaylen. I am a big fan of his but this was a terrible look for him tonight. If he doesn't wake up there's going to be a big shake up coming with his name on it


tatum is 23, everyone doesn't have to lead the same way. you can lead a horse to water...

everybody agrees that Al is a leader and yet we fell apart in that kyrie season with him. sometimes being a good leader isn't all it takes. we don't know what happens behind the scenes.


he is an anti leader. i get it, nba players are entitled, it's the aau era or whatever you call it. tatum is an extreme case. even by today's standards, he's more of an entitled brat than 99.99%. if that play at the end of the first half last night(crying to the ref over the no call after rob finished his missed layup) didn't turn people off to him, i don't know what will. it spoke volumes. tatum and smart need to go. start over.
fallguy
General Manager
Posts: 7,842
And1: 12,687
Joined: Jun 12, 2009

Re: Post-Game Notes: WAS 116, BOS 107 (2-3) 

Post#113 » by fallguy » Thu Oct 28, 2021 2:29 pm

The_Ghost_of_JB wrote:Smart stars
7-4-4 25% shooting

Dennis schroder
16-4-6 40% shooting.

I'm sure some people will pull some advanced stats nonsense but looking at the difference between the two why would smart continue to start? If you have a guy that is a better shooter and equal rebounder and a better distributor why would you not start him considering how many times this team has a slow start?


You don't make this kind of choice with a guy signed longterm after 5 games.

That said - Schroder is much more effective at collapsing the defense than Smart and that's something we need.
The most charitable interpretation is that it's ethnic cleansing and massive war crimes.
FeedReed
Starter
Posts: 2,307
And1: 839
Joined: Jan 17, 2006

Re: Post-Game Notes: WAS 116, BOS 107 (2-3) 

Post#114 » by FeedReed » Thu Oct 28, 2021 2:30 pm

i don't understand pritchard getting dnp'd. smart is not good enough to where pritchard shouldn't play at all.
fallguy
General Manager
Posts: 7,842
And1: 12,687
Joined: Jun 12, 2009

Re: Post-Game Notes: WAS 116, BOS 107 (2-3) 

Post#115 » by fallguy » Thu Oct 28, 2021 2:31 pm

Ime's candor is really appealing. Brad would never say the kind of stuff he does in the post-games.

It's early. Very early. And toughening up this bunch and getting them focused is job #1.

But a bigger roster change than we expect might be coming....
The most charitable interpretation is that it's ethnic cleansing and massive war crimes.
JJHondo17
Pro Prospect
Posts: 972
And1: 783
Joined: Jul 20, 2007
Location: Game#5 - June 4, 1976

Re: Post-Game Notes: WAS 116, BOS 107 (2-3) 

Post#116 » by JJHondo17 » Thu Oct 28, 2021 2:33 pm

And yet Smart was the only Celtic to post a plus in the +/- (+3) :dontknow: I know that's' not popular right now and neither is this. I don't think Rob Williams plays hard enough. Always see him jogging up the floor instead of putting pressure off on a retreating defense, doesn't approach setting picks or getting into screen-n- rolls with enough force. And has been timid underneath failing to finish with force.
User avatar
The_Ghost_of_JB
RealGM
Posts: 22,559
And1: 18,644
Joined: Mar 04, 2010
Location: In a van down by the river.
   

Re: Post-Game Notes: WAS 116, BOS 107 (2-3) 

Post#117 » by The_Ghost_of_JB » Thu Oct 28, 2021 2:35 pm

fallguy wrote:
The_Ghost_of_JB wrote:Smart stars
7-4-4 25% shooting

Dennis schroder
16-4-6 40% shooting.

I'm sure some people will pull some advanced stats nonsense but looking at the difference between the two why would smart continue to start? If you have a guy that is a better shooter and equal rebounder and a better distributor why would you not start him considering how many times this team has a slow start?


You don't make this kind of choice with a guy signed longterm after 5 games.

That said - Schroder is much more effective at collapsing the defense than Smart and that's something we need.


Why not? Shouldn't you be doing what's best for the team? It's not like smart lit the world on fire last year when he started either. Smart simply isn't a starting point guard. The sooner the team realizes that the better they will be.

I'm sure the players like how hard smart plays but anyone who has ever played basketball on any level at all knows one of the most annoying teammates you can have is the guy who can't shoot constantly putting up shots.
*Insert witty signature here.*
ddb
RealGM
Posts: 11,573
And1: 11,900
Joined: May 10, 2007

Re: Post-Game Notes: WAS 116, BOS 107 (2-3) 

Post#118 » by ddb » Thu Oct 28, 2021 2:38 pm

We don't need more of a sample size to know that Marcus Smart is not the answer at PG. Many of our concerns heading into the season about Smart in that role have rapidly proven to be true. He's better suited as the Swiss-army-knife coming off the bench. Period. There is literally no debate. He cannot shoot AT ALL and never will be able to. He's to turnover prone. The list goes on. He's a 22-25MPG guy off the bench who can bring toughness, energy, and occasionally get hot shooting. That's it.
User avatar
The_Ghost_of_JB
RealGM
Posts: 22,559
And1: 18,644
Joined: Mar 04, 2010
Location: In a van down by the river.
   

Re: Post-Game Notes: WAS 116, BOS 107 (2-3) 

Post#119 » by The_Ghost_of_JB » Thu Oct 28, 2021 2:38 pm

fallguy wrote:
The_Ghost_of_JB wrote:Smart stars
7-4-4 25% shooting

Dennis schroder
16-4-6 40% shooting.

I'm sure some people will pull some advanced stats nonsense but looking at the difference between the two why would smart continue to start? If you have a guy that is a better shooter and equal rebounder and a better distributor why would you not start him considering how many times this team has a slow start?


You don't make this kind of choice with a guy signed longterm after 5 games.

That said - Schroder is much more effective at collapsing the defense than Smart and that's something we need.


Why not? Shouldn't you be doing what's best for the team? We already have Ime calling out the team and JB yet somehow Smart can't be touched?

It's not like smart lit the world on fire last year when he started either. Smart simply isn't a starting point guard. The sooner the team realizes that the better they will be.

I'm sure the players like how hard smart plays but anyone who has ever played basketball on any level at all knows one of the most annoying teammates you can have is the guy who can't shoot constantly putting up shots.
*Insert witty signature here.*
fallguy
General Manager
Posts: 7,842
And1: 12,687
Joined: Jun 12, 2009

Re: Post-Game Notes: WAS 116, BOS 107 (2-3) 

Post#120 » by fallguy » Thu Oct 28, 2021 2:38 pm

The_Ghost_of_JB wrote:
fallguy wrote:
The_Ghost_of_JB wrote:Smart stars
7-4-4 25% shooting

Dennis schroder
16-4-6 40% shooting.

I'm sure some people will pull some advanced stats nonsense but looking at the difference between the two why would smart continue to start? If you have a guy that is a better shooter and equal rebounder and a better distributor why would you not start him considering how many times this team has a slow start?


You don't make this kind of choice with a guy signed longterm after 5 games.

That said - Schroder is much more effective at collapsing the defense than Smart and that's something we need.


Why not? Shouldn't you be doing what's best for the team? It's not like smart lit the world on fire last year when he started either. Smart simply isn't a starting point guard. The sooner the team realizes that the better they will be.

I'm sure the players like how hard smart plays but anyone who has ever played basketball on any level at all knows one of the most annoying teammates you can have is the guy who can't shoot constantly putting up shots.


I'm with you on Smart's shooting. Smitty noted in his recap that his current percentages make him unplayable and he's right.

But what's best for the team is not to demote the guy you just handed a four-year-deal based on a five-game sample size.
The most charitable interpretation is that it's ethnic cleansing and massive war crimes.

Return to Boston Celtics