3toheadmelo wrote:

Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
god shammgod wrote:good win. but randle doesn't have it in him to be a 1st option at the end of games. we've seen it a bunch of times. some of you don't want to but we're gonna have to make a trade eventually.
Chanel Bomber wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:While Randle didn’t shoot well, he did pull down 16 rebounds and was just one assist shy of a triple-double, as Thibodeau pointed out how much he did to get his teammates involved in the big win.
“I love the fact that everyone is sacrificing and putting the team first. That’s how you win big in this league,” Thibodeau said.
“[Randle] made plays. We got wide-open threes, he read the defense really well. So that’s what gave us that initial cushion. They were coming hard from the baseline and he was reading and guys were getting to their space, and that’s what winning is all about. The game tells you the play to make.
“Julius can beat you with his scoring, he can beat you with his rebounding, he can beat you with his passing, he can beat you with his ability to get to the free-throw line – there’s so many different ways he can hurt you. He rebounded great, he was a great playmaker, and I just loved it. I loved the way he played. It wasn’t about scoring.”
Randle echoed what Thibodeau had to say, as well, noting that he doesn’t need to score 30 points every night with the talented group he has around him.
“That’s what it’s about. I don’t like to force anything. I know my guys will be in their spots or whatever it is, and I just make plays,” Randle said. “Really, that’s what it’s all about.
“I’m just going to drive, create and make the right plays, and when it’s time for me to be aggressive, I’ll be aggressive.”
Randle had a very good albeit discrete game until the last 3 minutes of the game.
He forces it a bit in crunch time. He should let Rose or Kemba initiate and play PNR more often down the stretch. Mix it up a little bit, some PNR, some ISO, some set plays, but not all ISO.
Clyde_Style wrote:god shammgod wrote:good win. but randle doesn't have it in him to be a 1st option at the end of games. we've seen it a bunch of times. some of you don't want to but we're gonna have to make a trade eventually.
Numerous times during the game it was like watching Randle's inner demons wrestle between looking for his teammates and playing hero ball. It is really obvious he is not making a smooth adjustment to having multiple scorers around him and that concerns me, because it means he will continue to revert to his instincts under pressure and we know his instincts can be pretty poor when he panics.
When he lets the game come to him and he sees the floor he's a really good player. He can make the right decision, but he has been one of the most ragged players early in the season so far. Even if RJ had some quiet games offensively, he stays in the game by focusing on multiple facets. But Julius just turns into Dubious Handles when he forces his shots and they aren't falling.
Randle is not a # 1 option unless he gets his mind right and deals with pressure better. A # 1 is meant to be a shot maker with the game on the line and sometimes that means passing under pressure with a few seconds left if your teammate has a significantly better shot. Julius would typically jack a bad shot rather than pass.
Betta Bulleavit wrote:What’s up Knick fans. Congrats on the win. Heaven knows you guys deserved it a heck of a lot more than we did. In fact, by the time we got to the 4th quarter, I was actually preferring that we (Bulls) took the L because we simply didn’t do anything to suggest that we deserved to win. I think the Bulls will be able to take a lot more from this loss than they would’ve had they pulled it out in the end. The Knicks are a strong team and our guys need to know that you can’t half-a** it against good teams and expect to win consistently. So I actually think we will be better off for this one and I expect some real dog fights this season between the two teams.
GONYK wrote:snadler wrote:So glad knicks didn't sign Ball
He's a cream puff for the most part. Solid defender, but name garners more hype than the game.
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
Capn'O wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:god shammgod wrote:good win. but randle doesn't have it in him to be a 1st option at the end of games. we've seen it a bunch of times. some of you don't want to but we're gonna have to make a trade eventually.
Numerous times during the game it was like watching Randle's inner demons wrestle between looking for his teammates and playing hero ball. It is really obvious he is not making a smooth adjustment to having multiple scorers around him and that concerns me, because it means he will continue to revert to his instincts under pressure and we know his instincts can be pretty poor when he panics.
When he lets the game come to him and he sees the floor he's a really good player. He can make the right decision, but he has been one of the most ragged players early in the season so far. Even if RJ had some quiet games offensively, he stays in the game by focusing on multiple facets. But Julius just turns into Dubious Handles when he forces his shots and they aren't falling.
Randle is not a # 1 option unless he gets his mind right and deals with pressure better. A # 1 is meant to be a shot maker with the game on the line and sometimes that means passing under pressure with a few seconds left if your teammate has a significantly better shot. Julius would typically jack a bad shot rather than pass.
Then we ultimately put the ball in Kemba, Rose, or RJs hands more down the stretch.
The concerning thing for me is that we can't get him cooking when teams play to his weaknesses. We have more options around him this year but ultimately we need to figure that out. Smaller, long defenders and, of course, doubles really flummox him on the perimeter. Can we get him in the post, where his vision is a little better or figure out some off ball screen action to get him space before he starts his move?
I mean, sham's right about the end game but until the right move presents itself we need to work with what we have better.
Clyde_Style wrote:GONYK wrote:snadler wrote:So glad knicks didn't sign Ball
He's a cream puff for the most part. Solid defender, but name garners more hype than the game.
I'm now satisfied to go with our PG by committee than having signed Lonzo. If he had been a Knick we'd be chewing our typing fingers off out of frustration watching him be nonchalant half the time.
Clyde_Style wrote:Betta Bulleavit wrote:What’s up Knick fans. Congrats on the win. Heaven knows you guys deserved it a heck of a lot more than we did. In fact, by the time we got to the 4th quarter, I was actually preferring that we (Bulls) took the L because we simply didn’t do anything to suggest that we deserved to win. I think the Bulls will be able to take a lot more from this loss than they would’ve had they pulled it out in the end. The Knicks are a strong team and our guys need to know that you can’t half-a** it against good teams and expect to win consistently. So I actually think we will be better off for this one and I expect some real dog fights this season between the two teams.
I was trying to be nice to the guys on your board who were trying to find a way to basically say the Bulls are better. As of now, I'd say we're better and we were the better team for the majority of the game. We stunk it up at the end and that's no excuse, but I think we're going to be a lot better than most people or the pundits realize. We're not just deep. We have some good players.
Bulls will be good too. Your schedule will sort out a lot this next month and then you'll know what you need to work on. If I were a Bulls fan I'd probably be riding on Lonzo to develop some killer instinct. The guy coasts too much and could be much better with a mental shift.
Clyde_Style wrote:Capn'O wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:
Numerous times during the game it was like watching Randle's inner demons wrestle between looking for his teammates and playing hero ball. It is really obvious he is not making a smooth adjustment to having multiple scorers around him and that concerns me, because it means he will continue to revert to his instincts under pressure and we know his instincts can be pretty poor when he panics.
When he lets the game come to him and he sees the floor he's a really good player. He can make the right decision, but he has been one of the most ragged players early in the season so far. Even if RJ had some quiet games offensively, he stays in the game by focusing on multiple facets. But Julius just turns into Dubious Handles when he forces his shots and they aren't falling.
Randle is not a # 1 option unless he gets his mind right and deals with pressure better. A # 1 is meant to be a shot maker with the game on the line and sometimes that means passing under pressure with a few seconds left if your teammate has a significantly better shot. Julius would typically jack a bad shot rather than pass.
Then we ultimately put the ball in Kemba, Rose, or RJs hands more down the stretch.
The concerning thing for me is that we can't get him cooking when teams play to his weaknesses. We have more options around him this year but ultimately we need to figure that out. Smaller, long defenders and, of course, doubles really flummox him on the perimeter. Can we get him in the post, where his vision is a little better or figure out some off ball screen action to get him space before he starts his move?
I mean, sham's right about the end game but until the right move presents itself we need to work with what we have better.
I've had a sneaking feeling that at times Randle is stat padding and if I'm right that bothers me because he doesn't need to having just gotten paid.
I'd add Fournier to your list of possible closers. You draw up a play for one of them, but with the option to pass since all of them can shoot. Thibs really has to move away from treating Randle like he's King Julius and make him one of the cogs again. Because that's how we will contend this season. If we become the most selfless team in the NBA this year we'll beat everyone. If not, we'll stumble and play much worse. And how Randle responds to pressure is key to unlocking that.
Other thing I'm feeling is RJ is going to be a much bigger deal this season which is good for everyone. Again, I hope Randle understands he's one of the guys now, not THE guy. I know RJ gets that. Kemba gets it. Rose gets it. Taj gets it. Evan does too. So Randle needs to adjust now.
Clyde_Style wrote:Capn'O wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:
Numerous times during the game it was like watching Randle's inner demons wrestle between looking for his teammates and playing hero ball. It is really obvious he is not making a smooth adjustment to having multiple scorers around him and that concerns me, because it means he will continue to revert to his instincts under pressure and we know his instincts can be pretty poor when he panics.
When he lets the game come to him and he sees the floor he's a really good player. He can make the right decision, but he has been one of the most ragged players early in the season so far. Even if RJ had some quiet games offensively, he stays in the game by focusing on multiple facets. But Julius just turns into Dubious Handles when he forces his shots and they aren't falling.
Randle is not a # 1 option unless he gets his mind right and deals with pressure better. A # 1 is meant to be a shot maker with the game on the line and sometimes that means passing under pressure with a few seconds left if your teammate has a significantly better shot. Julius would typically jack a bad shot rather than pass.
Then we ultimately put the ball in Kemba, Rose, or RJs hands more down the stretch.
The concerning thing for me is that we can't get him cooking when teams play to his weaknesses. We have more options around him this year but ultimately we need to figure that out. Smaller, long defenders and, of course, doubles really flummox him on the perimeter. Can we get him in the post, where his vision is a little better or figure out some off ball screen action to get him space before he starts his move?
I mean, sham's right about the end game but until the right move presents itself we need to work with what we have better.
I've had a sneaking feeling that at times Randle is stat padding and if I'm right that bothers me because he doesn't need to having just gotten paid.
I'd add Fournier to your list of possible closers. You draw up a play for one of them, but with the option to pass since all of them can shoot. Thibs really has to move away from treating Randle like he's King Julius and make him one of the cogs again. Because that's how we will contend this season. If we become the most selfless team in the NBA this year we'll beat everyone. If not, we'll stumble and play much worse. And how Randle responds to pressure is key to unlocking that.
Other thing I'm feeling is RJ is going to be a much bigger deal this season which is good for everyone. Again, I hope Randle understands he's one of the guys now, not THE guy. I know RJ gets that. Kemba gets it. Rose gets it. Taj gets it. Evan does too. So Randle needs to adjust now.
Capn'O wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:Betta Bulleavit wrote:What’s up Knick fans. Congrats on the win. Heaven knows you guys deserved it a heck of a lot more than we did. In fact, by the time we got to the 4th quarter, I was actually preferring that we (Bulls) took the L because we simply didn’t do anything to suggest that we deserved to win. I think the Bulls will be able to take a lot more from this loss than they would’ve had they pulled it out in the end. The Knicks are a strong team and our guys need to know that you can’t half-a** it against good teams and expect to win consistently. So I actually think we will be better off for this one and I expect some real dog fights this season between the two teams.
I was trying to be nice to the guys on your board who were trying to find a way to basically say the Bulls are better. As of now, I'd say we're better and we were the better team for the majority of the game. We stunk it up at the end and that's no excuse, but I think we're going to be a lot better than most people or the pundits realize. We're not just deep. We have some good players.
Bulls will be good too. Your schedule will sort out a lot this next month and then you'll know what you need to work on. If I were a Bulls fan I'd probably be riding on Lonzo to develop some killer instinct. The guy coasts too much and could be much better with a mental shift.
Reality is both teams' defense made the other look worse than they normally are. Lonzo and Caruso were very disruptive in our passing lanes and we were able to basically neutralize their perimeter offense and force isos. Bulls finally found some holes at the end but too late. Knicks/Bulls dogfights are back.
Mirotek wrote:You guys have a great team. Wanted to see your rookies Grimes and Mcbride but good game.
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
Capn'O wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:Betta Bulleavit wrote:What’s up Knick fans. Congrats on the win. Heaven knows you guys deserved it a heck of a lot more than we did. In fact, by the time we got to the 4th quarter, I was actually preferring that we (Bulls) took the L because we simply didn’t do anything to suggest that we deserved to win. I think the Bulls will be able to take a lot more from this loss than they would’ve had they pulled it out in the end. The Knicks are a strong team and our guys need to know that you can’t half-a** it against good teams and expect to win consistently. So I actually think we will be better off for this one and I expect some real dog fights this season between the two teams.
I was trying to be nice to the guys on your board who were trying to find a way to basically say the Bulls are better. As of now, I'd say we're better and we were the better team for the majority of the game. We stunk it up at the end and that's no excuse, but I think we're going to be a lot better than most people or the pundits realize. We're not just deep. We have some good players.
Bulls will be good too. Your schedule will sort out a lot this next month and then you'll know what you need to work on. If I were a Bulls fan I'd probably be riding on Lonzo to develop some killer instinct. The guy coasts too much and could be much better with a mental shift.
Reality is both teams' defense made the other look worse than they normally are. Lonzo and Caruso were very disruptive in our passing lanes and we were able to basically neutralize their perimeter offense and force isos. Bulls finally found some holes at the end but too late. Knicks/Bulls dogfights are back.
Mirotek wrote:You guys have a great team. Wanted to see your rookies Grimes and Mcbride but good game.