Image ImageImage Image

Options to fix the PF hole

Moderators: HomoSapien, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man

StunnerKO
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,017
And1: 3,143
Joined: Sep 25, 2017

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#221 » by StunnerKO » Sun Oct 31, 2021 3:30 pm

Word on the street is Clarke is cooked
User avatar
Salo23
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,639
And1: 487
Joined: Jul 09, 2001

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#222 » by Salo23 » Sun Oct 31, 2021 3:33 pm

ikeziskash wrote:Can someone fill me in on Brandon Clarke's strengths and weaknesses? High IQ? Motor? Rebounding? Defense? Offense? Yes, I've read some reports but more interested in hearing from the smarter folks who are here on this board, not the people who write scouting reports and also put the Bulls as a .500 team.

He fell in the draft because he was a much older prospect (college senior, 23-24 years old) with the playing style of a traditional big, but had poor measurements at the nba combine in terms of height, weight and wingspan for a big.

But he was insanely productive in college based on a lot of advanced metrics/statistics and could jump out of the gym with highlight reel dunks and blocks.
We are missing a lot of layups right now as a team, and that is on me... It’s my job to make sure we’re ready to make our layups." - Thibodeau.
heir_jordan22
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,406
And1: 325
Joined: Jul 16, 2008
   

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#223 » by heir_jordan22 » Sun Oct 31, 2021 3:44 pm

coldfish wrote:
ikeziskash wrote:Can someone fill me in on Brandon Clarke's strengths and weaknesses? High IQ? Motor? Rebounding? Defense? Offense? Yes, I've read some reports but more interested in hearing from the smarter folks who are here on this board, not the people who write scouting reports and also put the Bulls as a .500 team.


I really liked Clarke early on in his career. He is hard working and smart. If I had to find a comparison as it relates to the Bulls, it would be Taj Gibson with a little worse defense. At least, stylistically.

That said, Clarke plays the game like a big man and not a wing player. That isn't what the Bulls are looking for obviously. They want a tall small forward at the PF spot, not a small center. I doubt Clarke would be on their radar.

You're probably right but idk of NY who are decent and available. Jerani Grant is a pipe dream. It would've been great if we got involved in the lalers-wizards trade and ended up with Kuzma, but that's not happening at this point. Maybe Avdija. Or if we somehow steal Ben Simmons.
User avatar
coldfish
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 60,595
And1: 37,876
Joined: Jun 11, 2004
Location: Right in the middle
   

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#224 » by coldfish » Sun Oct 31, 2021 3:49 pm

heir_jordan22 wrote:
coldfish wrote:
ikeziskash wrote:Can someone fill me in on Brandon Clarke's strengths and weaknesses? High IQ? Motor? Rebounding? Defense? Offense? Yes, I've read some reports but more interested in hearing from the smarter folks who are here on this board, not the people who write scouting reports and also put the Bulls as a .500 team.


I really liked Clarke early on in his career. He is hard working and smart. If I had to find a comparison as it relates to the Bulls, it would be Taj Gibson with a little worse defense. At least, stylistically.

That said, Clarke plays the game like a big man and not a wing player. That isn't what the Bulls are looking for obviously. They want a tall small forward at the PF spot, not a small center. I doubt Clarke would be on their radar.

You're probably right but idk of NY who are decent and available. Jerani Grant is a pipe dream. It would've been great if we got involved in the lalers-wizards trade and ended up with Kuzma, but that's not happening at this point. Maybe Avdija. Or if we somehow steal Ben Simmons.


IMO, one of two things happens:
- The team struggles from here on out and they decide to hold on to their assets
- The team plays really well and they cash in more assets in an attempt to go for it

I think that Pat + Coby + expiring + Portland pick could get you a reasonably good PF. The question is if Chicago is willing to pay the tax for it next year once Lavine's extension kicks in.
superdave
Rookie
Posts: 1,006
And1: 445
Joined: Aug 23, 2003
Location: LaLa land

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#225 » by superdave » Sun Oct 31, 2021 3:53 pm

The only two guys who move the needle past what we have are Maxi Kleber and Mo Bamba. Size, defense, with catch and shoot 3-pt shooting. Looking at advanced stats, Bagley ain’t it.
User avatar
rtblues
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,802
And1: 2,577
Joined: Jul 12, 2008

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#226 » by rtblues » Sun Oct 31, 2021 5:01 pm

Whatever the "fix" is, it shouldn't come at the cost of trading of young, un-developed, top-10 draft choices.
First off, Coby provides a possible answer to another problem area the Bulls have, 3-pt/bench scoring, and he is still young.
And PW is only 20 ffs!

I'd rather commit to PW missing the year, which would qualify the Bulls to get the "injured player exception", because what can be realistically expected of PW after missing the whole season, should he return in time for the end of the season or playoffs? I'd rather get that exception and not rely on a rusty PW in a late-season/playoff type of pressure situations. He wasn't ever really providing that much before he got hurt. He's not going to change much coming back late. Rather get a guy on the exception who can help now.

I sure wouldn't trade him or Coby unless the return was some extraordinary cache that they simply couldn't refuse.
"I wouldn’t call it a rebuild; more of a retool.” - Gar Forman, June 2016
heir_jordan22
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,406
And1: 325
Joined: Jul 16, 2008
   

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#227 » by heir_jordan22 » Sun Oct 31, 2021 7:20 pm

coldfish wrote:
heir_jordan22 wrote:
coldfish wrote:
I really liked Clarke early on in his career. He is hard working and smart. If I had to find a comparison as it relates to the Bulls, it would be Taj Gibson with a little worse defense. At least, stylistically.

That said, Clarke plays the game like a big man and not a wing player. That isn't what the Bulls are looking for obviously. They want a tall small forward at the PF spot, not a small center. I doubt Clarke would be on their radar.

You're probably right but idk of NY who are decent and available. Jerani Grant is a pipe dream. It would've been great if we got involved in the lalers-wizards trade and ended up with Kuzma, but that's not happening at this point. Maybe Avdija. Or if we somehow steal Ben Simmons.


IMO, one of two things happens:
- The team struggles from here on out and they decide to hold on to their assets
- The team plays really well and they cash in more assets in an attempt to go for it

I think that Pat + Coby + expiring + Portland pick could get you a reasonably good PF. The question is if Chicago is willing to pay the tax for it next year once Lavine's extension kicks in.

The guy I really want is Jonathan Isaac if he's healthy. He's exactly what you said earlier, a tall SF who plays PF. Can guard well at pretty much all positions, excellent shot blocker. Not there offensively but on this team that wouldn't matter very y much in my opinion. He'd change everything for us defensively
User avatar
coldfish
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 60,595
And1: 37,876
Joined: Jun 11, 2004
Location: Right in the middle
   

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#228 » by coldfish » Sun Oct 31, 2021 8:15 pm

rtblues wrote:Whatever the "fix" is, it shouldn't come at the cost of trading of young, un-developed, top-10 draft choices.
First off, Coby provides a possible answer to another problem area the Bulls have, 3-pt/bench scoring, and he is still young.
And PW is only 20 ffs!

I'd rather commit to PW missing the year, which would qualify the Bulls to get the "injured player exception", because what can be realistically expected of PW after missing the whole season, should he return in time for the end of the season or playoffs? I'd rather get that exception and not rely on a rusty PW in a late-season/playoff type of pressure situations. He wasn't ever really providing that much before he got hurt. He's not going to change much coming back late. Rather get a guy on the exception who can help now.

I sure wouldn't trade him or Coby unless the return was some extraordinary cache that they simply couldn't refuse.


Remember that this incarnation of the Bulls has a very short window. Vucevic and Derozan and Caruso will be gone in a few years.

You have to be pretty confident that those guys will be big time contributors soon or that in the long term they will be great players in order to justify harming the team this year to keep them.
FecesOfDeath
Head Coach
Posts: 6,116
And1: 1,686
Joined: Mar 21, 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
       

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#229 » by FecesOfDeath » Sun Oct 31, 2021 11:33 pm

Keep an eye on Kevin Knox. An athletic big SF with a three point shot and decent handles for his position. I actually think his skillset would be a great fit for this roster, if he can pick up the system. Thibs doesn't play him at all, which means he should be a buy low candidate.
DxC17
Junior
Posts: 328
And1: 432
Joined: Apr 22, 2015
     

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#230 » by DxC17 » Sun Oct 31, 2021 11:43 pm

FecesOfDeath wrote:Keep an eye on Kevin Knox. An athletic big SF with a three point shot and decent handles for his position. I actually think his skillset would be a great fit for this roster, if he can pick up the system. Thibs doesn't play him at all, which means he should be a buy low candidate.


No thanks. Career 36.9% FG shooter with no strong skill of any kind on the court. Athletic but can’t play D. Knox started his career off bad & somehow kept getting worse. He is not a NBA caliber player IMO, and is lucky to be on the Knicks roster.
User avatar
NecessaryEvil
RealGM
Posts: 10,237
And1: 7,631
Joined: Jun 12, 2014
 

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#231 » by NecessaryEvil » Sun Oct 31, 2021 11:45 pm

FecesOfDeath wrote:Keep an eye on Kevin Knox. An athletic big SF with a three point shot and decent handles for his position. I actually think his skillset would be a great fit for this roster, if he can pick up the system. Thibs doesn't play him at all, which means he should be a buy low candidate.


If Thibs won't play you, you're trash.
Butler4thewin
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,551
And1: 532
Joined: Jan 07, 2017
   

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#232 » by Butler4thewin » Mon Nov 1, 2021 12:56 am

I’m all for going all in but if Lavine doesn’t show he’s the man in big games we atleast know to trade him after a sign
User avatar
Michael Jackson
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 29,740
And1: 11,792
Joined: Jun 15, 2001

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#233 » by Michael Jackson » Mon Nov 1, 2021 1:25 am

heir_jordan22 wrote:
coldfish wrote:
heir_jordan22 wrote:You're probably right but idk of NY who are decent and available. Jerani Grant is a pipe dream. It would've been great if we got involved in the lalers-wizards trade and ended up with Kuzma, but that's not happening at this point. Maybe Avdija. Or if we somehow steal Ben Simmons.


IMO, one of two things happens:
- The team struggles from here on out and they decide to hold on to their assets
- The team plays really well and they cash in more assets in an attempt to go for it

I think that Pat + Coby + expiring + Portland pick could get you a reasonably good PF. The question is if Chicago is willing to pay the tax for it next year once Lavine's extension kicks in.

The guy I really want is Jonathan Isaac if he's healthy. He's exactly what you said earlier, a tall SF who plays PF. Can guard well at pretty much all positions, excellent shot blocker. Not there offensively but on this team that wouldn't matter very y much in my opinion. He'd change everything for us defensively



Yeah but I don’t think Orlando wants to move him. He is one of the guys they stuck with when cleaning house.
Hangtime84
RealGM
Posts: 20,997
And1: 4,728
Joined: Aug 18, 2006
Location: Rogers Park
     

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#234 » by Hangtime84 » Mon Nov 1, 2021 1:26 am

heir_jordan22 wrote:The guy I really want is Jonathan Isaac if he's healthy. He's exactly what you said earlier, a tall SF who plays PF. Can guard well at pretty much all positions, excellent shot blocker. Not there offensively but on this team that wouldn't matter very y much in my opinion. He'd change everything for us defensively


Team No Vaccine i'm good and i like him a lot has a player. Vuc could be asked about him.
Jcool0 wrote:
aguifs wrote:Do we have a friggin plan?


If the Bulls do, you would be complaining to much to ever hear it.


NBA fan logic we need to trade one of two best players because (Player X) one needs to shine more.
CaPiTanAK
Pro Prospect
Posts: 769
And1: 435
Joined: Dec 26, 2020

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#235 » by CaPiTanAK » Mon Nov 1, 2021 11:46 am

I think the Magic is a seller on Mohamed Bamba. I think a 2 second rounders might do it or a conditional first might do it.
User avatar
Lunartic
Head Coach
Posts: 6,085
And1: 9,746
Joined: Nov 28, 2015

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#236 » by Lunartic » Mon Nov 1, 2021 3:35 pm

Mo Bamba would be a ideal. Isaac would be great too. The Bulls will not thrive in the playoffs if they cannot rebound.
User avatar
Grodoboldo
Analyst
Posts: 3,739
And1: 2,834
Joined: Sep 26, 2010
Location: Sao Paulo
 

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#237 » by Grodoboldo » Mon Nov 1, 2021 4:39 pm

Lunartic wrote:Mo Bamba would be a ideal. Isaac would be great too. The Bulls will not thrive in the playoffs if they cannot rebound.


I'd love both of them on them here, but given Orlando's rebuilg status, I don't see them giving them up easily.

Bamba is probably attainable, as he'll be a RFA and they already extended MCJ, but we'd have to give something up. Also, we'll be in the tax next year, so we'd probably need to have aligned an acceptable value for his extension in the offseason.
Constantly underwhelmed by the Bulls.
User avatar
Grodoboldo
Analyst
Posts: 3,739
And1: 2,834
Joined: Sep 26, 2010
Location: Sao Paulo
 

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#238 » by Grodoboldo » Mon Nov 1, 2021 4:43 pm

Read on Twitter


@ShamsCharania: Sources: Phoenix is declining center Jalen Smith’s third-year rookie option ($4.7M), making him an unrestricted free agent in 2022. The 6-foot-10 big man averaged 9.5 points and 8 rebounds in four preseason games after posting 16.25 PPG/12.5 RPG in summer league.

I know the thread is about this year in particular, but I'd take a flyer on him next season at the minimum or in a two-way contract. He was supposed to be a small ball center who could provide weak-side rim protection and shooting.
Constantly underwhelmed by the Bulls.
2weekswithpay
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,370
And1: 2,518
Joined: Dec 22, 2020
     

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#239 » by 2weekswithpay » Mon Nov 1, 2021 5:50 pm

Grodoboldo wrote:
Read on Twitter


@ShamsCharania: Sources: Phoenix is declining center Jalen Smith’s third-year rookie option ($4.7M), making him an unrestricted free agent in 2022. The 6-foot-10 big man averaged 9.5 points and 8 rebounds in four preseason games after posting 16.25 PPG/12.5 RPG in summer league.

I know the thread is about this year in particular, but I'd take a flyer on him next season at the minimum or in a two-way contract. He was supposed to be a small ball center who could provide weak-side rim protection and shooting.


Kinda worrying that they're giving up on him after 1 season. Does he suck in practice or is this a way to avoid the tax?
MGB8
RealGM
Posts: 18,988
And1: 3,621
Joined: Jul 20, 2001
Location: Philly

Re: Options to fix the PF hole 

Post#240 » by MGB8 » Mon Nov 1, 2021 6:13 pm

2weekswithpay wrote:
Grodoboldo wrote:
Read on Twitter


@ShamsCharania: Sources: Phoenix is declining center Jalen Smith’s third-year rookie option ($4.7M), making him an unrestricted free agent in 2022. The 6-foot-10 big man averaged 9.5 points and 8 rebounds in four preseason games after posting 16.25 PPG/12.5 RPG in summer league.

I know the thread is about this year in particular, but I'd take a flyer on him next season at the minimum or in a two-way contract. He was supposed to be a small ball center who could provide weak-side rim protection and shooting.


Kinda worrying that they're giving up on him after 1 season. Does he suck in practice or is this a way to avoid the tax?


Very possibly both - but he's young.

Return to Chicago Bulls