floppymoose wrote:Rubio has become a specialist in running inexperienced teams. He was a great choice for Minny a while back, then the Suns, and now the Cavs.
Like the player version of Alvin Gentry
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
floppymoose wrote:Rubio has become a specialist in running inexperienced teams. He was a great choice for Minny a while back, then the Suns, and now the Cavs.
Magic#1 wrote:We have won two playoff games in two years. If we decide to keep this team for the next two years, maybe it will feel like we won a series.
JujitsuFlip wrote:I mean, hopefully whatever they get in return helps them achieve that and sustain it for longer, no? Holding onto an expiring 31 year old PG smells an awful lot like holding onto an expiring Drummond, an expiring partial guaranteed JR, and trading away a young point forward on a cheap rookie deal for a top 55 protected 2nd rounder because they refused to play him.SkyhookinUrMom wrote:JujitsuFlip wrote:Haha I agree. Why Cavs should think about moving him while his value is high. Koby Altman has a really bad habit of holding onto assets too long though.
maybe Cavs prefer to keep winning games?
Since the roster is devoid of actual wing players, I would start there. With the Sexton news obviously holding onto Rubio until at least NYE makes sense. I'm just not sure having Rubio on the roster past February 10th makes a lot of sense.ShootersShoot wrote:JujitsuFlip wrote:I mean, hopefully whatever they get in return helps them achieve that and sustain it for longer, no? Holding onto an expiring 31 year old PG smells an awful lot like holding onto an expiring Drummond, an expiring partial guaranteed JR, and trading away a young point forward on a cheap rookie deal for a top 55 protected 2nd rounder because they refused to play him.SkyhookinUrMom wrote:
maybe Cavs prefer to keep winning games?
The guy's the only playable vet on a roster full of guys all younger than 25. I would argue him being on the team helps them immensely. What exactly would you expect in return anyways? He is an expiring contract 31 year old. They might get a late first round pick at best for him.
JonFromVA wrote:JujitsuFlip wrote:I mean, hopefully whatever they get in return helps them achieve that and sustain it for longer, no? Holding onto an expiring 31 year old PG smells an awful lot like holding onto an expiring Drummond, an expiring partial guaranteed JR, and trading away a young point forward on a cheap rookie deal for a top 55 protected 2nd rounder because they refused to play him.SkyhookinUrMom wrote:
maybe Cavs prefer to keep winning games?
Whoa ... a whole lot wrong with those comments. Not to distract from this Rubio moment too much, but each of those players was in open revolt against the team and were first and foremost responsible for wrecking their own trade value for what they did on-court and off-court.
What happens with Ricky will depend on Ricky. If he's interested in sticking around with the team and extending, they should definitely discuss it. Maybe the Cavs are the contenders he's been looking for? If he still wants to control his own fate, then it comes down to what the Cavs can get for him. It's not clear at all at this point whether Kevin Pangos will be able to pickup the backup PG minutes, and JBB doesn't seem particularly interested in finding out. So, as long as their relationship doesn't go south, holding Ricky's Bird rights is worth something.
In general, the Cavs enjoy flipping expiring contracts for assets and salary that will eventually expire ... this just may be turning in to an exception.
JujitsuFlip wrote:JonFromVA wrote:JujitsuFlip wrote:I mean, hopefully whatever they get in return helps them achieve that and sustain it for longer, no? Holding onto an expiring 31 year old PG smells an awful lot like holding onto an expiring Drummond, an expiring partial guaranteed JR, and trading away a young point forward on a cheap rookie deal for a top 55 protected 2nd rounder because they refused to play him.
Whoa ... a whole lot wrong with those comments. Not to distract from this Rubio moment too much, but each of those players was in open revolt against the team and were first and foremost responsible for wrecking their own trade value for what they did on-court and off-court.
What happens with Ricky will depend on Ricky. If he's interested in sticking around with the team and extending, they should definitely discuss it. Maybe the Cavs are the contenders he's been looking for? If he still wants to control his own fate, then it comes down to what the Cavs can get for him. It's not clear at all at this point whether Kevin Pangos will be able to pickup the backup PG minutes, and JBB doesn't seem particularly interested in finding out. So, as long as their relationship doesn't go south, holding Ricky's Bird rights is worth something.
In general, the Cavs enjoy flipping expiring contracts for assets and salary that will eventually expire ... this just may be turning in to an exception.
KPJ just wanted to play and they refused to play him. Drummond probably never should've been acquired in the first place but last season when the team is 9-9 with Drummond averaging a double-double is a time to pounce. Similar to Cedi and Rubio currently who are playing outta their minds. The JR thing was just dumb how they kept giving him money while pushing back his guarantee date, just cut the guy he was held onto for way too long.
Pangos can't play in this league but go sign a Dunn or Exum type back-up PG, its time for Garland to take the reigns on this team, especially with the Sexton news. Also, I disagree having Rubio on the roster past February 10th makes much sense, considering the rumor is he will end up in Spain. Plus he has openly stated he didn't want to be on a team like the Cavs, he wants to be on a title contender.
JonFromVA wrote:JujitsuFlip wrote:JonFromVA wrote:
Whoa ... a whole lot wrong with those comments. Not to distract from this Rubio moment too much, but each of those players was in open revolt against the team and were first and foremost responsible for wrecking their own trade value for what they did on-court and off-court.
What happens with Ricky will depend on Ricky. If he's interested in sticking around with the team and extending, they should definitely discuss it. Maybe the Cavs are the contenders he's been looking for? If he still wants to control his own fate, then it comes down to what the Cavs can get for him. It's not clear at all at this point whether Kevin Pangos will be able to pickup the backup PG minutes, and JBB doesn't seem particularly interested in finding out. So, as long as their relationship doesn't go south, holding Ricky's Bird rights is worth something.
In general, the Cavs enjoy flipping expiring contracts for assets and salary that will eventually expire ... this just may be turning in to an exception.
KPJ just wanted to play and they refused to play him. Drummond probably never should've been acquired in the first place but last season when the team is 9-9 with Drummond averaging a double-double is a time to pounce. Similar to Cedi and Rubio currently who are playing outta their minds. The JR thing was just dumb how they kept giving him money while pushing back his guarantee date, just cut the guy he was held onto for way too long.
Pangos can't play in this league but go sign a Dunn or Exum type back-up PG, its time for Garland to take the reigns on this team, especially with the Sexton news. Also, I disagree having Rubio on the roster past February 10th makes much sense, considering the rumor is he will end up in Spain. Plus he has openly stated he didn't want to be on a team like the Cavs, he wants to be on a title contender.
If you want to discuss non-Rubio topics, please start something up in the Cavs section and I'll toss you some facts.
I have no idea what Pangos can or can't do, but from his highlights it looked to me like he knows how to run a P&R, and in general Euroleague PG's understand how to do PG things like making inbound passes and setting up teammates. Unlike Exum or Dunn, he can shoot the 3-ball which has value in our offense.
Rubio has significant value to the Cavs even if he doesn't want to be here next year. If we knew he was going to start acting unprofessional to force a buyout, that would change things; but it still comes down to what's offered.
JujitsuFlip wrote:Since the roster is devoid of actual wing players, I would start there. With the Sexton news obviously holding onto Rubio until at least NYE makes sense. I'm just not sure having Rubio on the roster past February 10th makes a lot of sense.ShootersShoot wrote:JujitsuFlip wrote:I mean, hopefully whatever they get in return helps them achieve that and sustain it for longer, no? Holding onto an expiring 31 year old PG smells an awful lot like holding onto an expiring Drummond, an expiring partial guaranteed JR, and trading away a young point forward on a cheap rookie deal for a top 55 protected 2nd rounder because they refused to play him.
The guy's the only playable vet on a roster full of guys all younger than 25. I would argue him being on the team helps them immensely. What exactly would you expect in return anyways? He is an expiring contract 31 year old. They might get a late first round pick at best for him.
ShootersShoot wrote:JujitsuFlip wrote:Since the roster is devoid of actual wing players, I would start there. With the Sexton news obviously holding onto Rubio until at least NYE makes sense. I'm just not sure having Rubio on the roster past February 10th makes a lot of sense.ShootersShoot wrote:
The guy's the only playable vet on a roster full of guys all younger than 25. I would argue him being on the team helps them immensely. What exactly would you expect in return anyways? He is an expiring contract 31 year old. They might get a late first round pick at best for him.
Not sure rubio gets more than a decent rotation wing at best, like a T Prince maybe, or I guess Batum at best case? Makes sense though since they have gaping holes at the wing.
Hard to say but I would say a career high 37 points on a career high 8 three pointers boosts Rubio's value.ShootersShoot wrote:JujitsuFlip wrote:Since the roster is devoid of actual wing players, I would start there. With the Sexton news obviously holding onto Rubio until at least NYE makes sense. I'm just not sure having Rubio on the roster past February 10th makes a lot of sense.ShootersShoot wrote:
The guy's the only playable vet on a roster full of guys all younger than 25. I would argue him being on the team helps them immensely. What exactly would you expect in return anyways? He is an expiring contract 31 year old. They might get a late first round pick at best for him.
Not sure rubio gets more than a decent rotation wing at best, like a T Prince maybe, or I guess Batum at best case? Makes sense though since they have gaping holes at the wing.
JujitsuFlip wrote:Hard to say but I would say a career high 37 points on a career high 8 three pointers boosts Rubio's value.ShootersShoot wrote:JujitsuFlip wrote:Since the roster is devoid of actual wing players, I would start there. With the Sexton news obviously holding onto Rubio until at least NYE makes sense. I'm just not sure having Rubio on the roster past February 10th makes a lot of sense.
Not sure rubio gets more than a decent rotation wing at best, like a T Prince maybe, or I guess Batum at best case? Makes sense though since they have gaping holes at the wing.
A decent rotation wing probably starts for the Cavs. But yeah Rubio gonna be needed until at least Sexton comes back so if he keeps having games like this will only boost his value.ShootersShoot wrote:JujitsuFlip wrote:Hard to say but I would say a career high 37 points on a career high 8 three pointers boosts Rubio's value.ShootersShoot wrote:
Not sure rubio gets more than a decent rotation wing at best, like a T Prince maybe, or I guess Batum at best case? Makes sense though since they have gaping holes at the wing.
He has value but really only for a "contender"..he's also an expiring so essentially a rental as well. Probably can get back a decent rotation wing. Nobody is giving up a quality starting wing for rubio.
PharmD wrote:Domejandro wrote:art_tatum wrote:Well Rubio wasn't the ? Choice at the time, it was Flynn. But ofc him and Steph's career will be always compared since he was drafted over him.
Ricky would have been really special if his career did not get derailed by injuries. Definitely not Stephen Curry level, but his career is a giant "what-if", even with how solid he has been despite those injuries.
Yeah, this is how he moved as a rookie:
He was a quick, long guard with a terrible shot and amazing BBIQ. Led the NBA in steal percentage three times. He's basically had no athleticism for 5 years now but finds a way to be effective.
antonac wrote:OKCfanSinceSGA wrote:I don’t get why he’s not on a contender. Clippers and others pursued hard the year before last... then Minny ends up traded for worthless trash? 2nd round pick, Prince and cash??? Any team could have offered that package. A number of contenders could use him, and I know he wanted to play for a title contender.
It is strange how Rondo seems to have made a career for himself as the king of contenders benches whereas Rubio has been stuck wandering between inexperienced teams showing them how to run an offense, they have basically exactly the same skill set.
you can see how he doesn't usually score much, that shooting form looks as lead footed as Valančiūnas.
levon wrote:this board: "THT's negative value"
this board after he's traded: "I like THT, and he's so young! stupid Lakers let another one go"
literally every Lakers young player in the last 7 years
floppymoose wrote:PharmD wrote:Domejandro wrote:Ricky would have been really special if his career did not get derailed by injuries. Definitely not Stephen Curry level, but his career is a giant "what-if", even with how solid he has been despite those injuries.
Yeah, this is how he moved as a rookie:
He was a quick, long guard with a terrible shot and amazing BBIQ. Led the NBA in steal percentage three times. He's basically had no athleticism for 5 years now but finds a way to be effective.
oh god, that cast... Darko, Wes, Beasley.... it's like a who's who of guys who dont understand basketball. Reminds me of early 2000's Warriors. Rubio didn't have a lot to work with.
JN61 wrote:Curry is shooting 37% from the 3 this year. Few years ago Rubio shot basically the same
JujitsuFlip wrote:https://sports.yahoo.com/ricky-rubio-nice-play-stephen-110131286.html
Speaking of him getting to feel like Steph Curry, quite the interesting quote from Rubio. He said, “It would be nice to play with Curry and Klay Thompson".
Very interesting, Cavs should probably move off his $17.8 million expiring contract considering he has a blown ACL and will walk in free agency.