Are the Warriors contenders?
Moderators: bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, ken6199, infinite11285, Clav, Dirk
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
-
DCasey91
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,538
- And1: 5,777
- Joined: Dec 15, 2020
-
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
I find pleasure in conversing with a fool just to peer into what they actually think which isn’t much in your case. Those think they they are smarter than everyone else has nothing to say. Which for you Warrior GM is that. Have a good life
Li WenWen is the GOAT
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
-
Danny1616
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,690
- And1: 12,725
- Joined: May 26, 2007
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
For the Warriors to be a contender, Klay would have come back and be at least 80% as good as he was pre injury.
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
-
Danny1616
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,690
- And1: 12,725
- Joined: May 26, 2007
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
DCasey91 wrote:WarriorGM wrote:I've said before that if you give Steph an average team he'll make them a contender. Looks like the rest of the roster meets that qualification. They are contenders.
So which average team Steph made into a contender?
That’s right none he’s never done that.
2015’s squad destroys this one that was not average at all. Exp and deep for days.
Take off the lipstick and let the man breath lol.
In 2020, the Warriors finished 15-50 without Curry.
In 2021, the Warriors finished 39-33 with Curry with virtually the same squad.
So Curry made arguably the worst roster in the league a good team last year. Obviously if he had an average roster he would elevate them into a contender.
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
-
DCasey91
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,538
- And1: 5,777
- Joined: Dec 15, 2020
-
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
Danny1616 wrote:DCasey91 wrote:WarriorGM wrote:I've said before that if you give Steph an average team he'll make them a contender. Looks like the rest of the roster meets that qualification. They are contenders.
So which average team Steph made into a contender?
That’s right none he’s never done that.
2015’s squad destroys this one that was not average at all. Exp and deep for days.
Take off the lipstick and let the man breath lol.
In 2020, the Warriors finished 15-50 without Curry.
In 2021, the Warriors finished 39-33 with Curry with virtually the same squad.
So Curry made arguably the worst roster in the league a good team last year. Obviously if he had an average roster he would elevate them into a contender.
Worst offensive roster historically 100% buy that.
I’ve only seen LBJ as the only player in the comp to get to the Finals with what would be an average roster more than once. Can’t see that for Curry. No slight on him and pound for pound one of the best ever, but his size, athleticism, playmaking and defensive capabilities aren’t in the same convo as Lebron.
Also GSW were ranked defensively something that Curry doesn’t contribute to.
Anyway it’s still wait and see on Klay before GSW are in the convo until then from my poi it’s a solid no.
Li WenWen is the GOAT
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
-
Peregrine01
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,754
- And1: 7,694
- Joined: Sep 12, 2012
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
Bumping this thread. Warriors have the best record in the league and have been absolutely smacking teams. They're first in defense so far and are getting just about anything they want on offense - and all this without Klay. Heavy 73-9 season vibes so far.
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
-
WarriorGM
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,933
- And1: 4,225
- Joined: Aug 19, 2017
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
At this rate it's just a matter of time before the detractors start whining it's so unfair that Curry is playing with Gary Payton II who makes the Warriors a stacked team.
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
- Impuniti
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,885
- And1: 7,809
- Joined: Jan 18, 2016
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
Bulls Warriors is going to be spicy.
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
- WESCO
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,396
- And1: 996
- Joined: Jan 06, 2006
- Location: Face Palm
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
^^^ Friday will be a great measuring stick for both teams.
Hopefully Dray can play.
Hopefully Dray can play.
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
-
DCasey91
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,538
- And1: 5,777
- Joined: Dec 15, 2020
-
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
Even one eyed blind Warriors fans would tell you they’ve had the easiest schedule so far.
Green should be DPOY (should have been last year too imo).
Green should be DPOY (should have been last year too imo).
Li WenWen is the GOAT
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
-
God Squad
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,379
- And1: 11,635
- Joined: Feb 22, 2010
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
I'm in the camp that whenever the Warriors are healthy they're contenders. The play the right way, and are just a beauty to watch. They preach off ball movement, defense is smothering and elite 3pt shooting.
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
- KingFox
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,149
- And1: 5,337
- Joined: Dec 23, 2014
-
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
Contenders, sure. Curry is unreal
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
-
BoatsNZones
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,972
- And1: 5,296
- Joined: Sep 23, 2020
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
Karate Diop wrote:Contenders? lol... They're not even a lock for the playoffs...
Tough take right now. The Warriors are forever the underdog, even after being the greatest team in NBA history. Don't sleep on a team with a still prime Curry when he has help.
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
-
Warriorfan
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,357
- And1: 2,801
- Joined: Jun 24, 2001
-
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
Warriors probable starting C and SG are still injured.
A third of the team is new so may develop better chemistry.
Curry is shooting below his career averages but usually starts slow.
Most of the other expected contenders did not make major additions except Lakers and Nets.
Defense for both with the age of the rosters should be in question.
A third of the team is new so may develop better chemistry.
Curry is shooting below his career averages but usually starts slow.
Most of the other expected contenders did not make major additions except Lakers and Nets.
Defense for both with the age of the rosters should be in question.
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
-
warriorschamps
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 826
- And1: 723
- Joined: Nov 16, 2015
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
WarriorGM wrote:At this rate it's just a matter of time before the detractors start whining it's so unfair that Curry is playing with Gary Payton II who makes the Warriors a stacked team.
Yep that's so unfair. It's when everybody were saying Klay & Green were bums but they win the chip then all of sudden Curry had too much help. Gotta love it. Can't make this stuff up.
Now Curry has Klay, Dray, Wiggins, GPII, Poole, etc, etc. Too much talent. Hand hat man the chip NOW!
Remember when everybody said Wiggins suck and nobody wanted him. Wiggins is a classic example of what happens when you play with a superstar who is empowering and not demeaning. But I will let haters carry on as they are clueless.
We always gave Tim Duncan so much credit just for the way he carried himself as a "superstar". Always putting the team before himself. It's time we give Curry that same respect.
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
-
Rapsalot
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,268
- And1: 1,678
- Joined: Mar 11, 2007
- Location: Traveling
-
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
10-15 games after Klay returns will be a better time to ask.
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
-
Buzzard
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,853
- And1: 7,524
- Joined: May 16, 2018
-
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
It all depends on if Klay comes back 100%. If so, they will be for sure.
BAF Pacers: Unleash Trae!
PG Ice Trae
SG Buddy Hield/Luke Kennard/Brandin Podziemski
SF OG Anunoby/Terrence Ross/Kris Murray
PF Richaun Holmes/JaMychal Green/Chris Livingston
C KAT/Mark Williams
PG Ice Trae
SG Buddy Hield/Luke Kennard/Brandin Podziemski
SF OG Anunoby/Terrence Ross/Kris Murray
PF Richaun Holmes/JaMychal Green/Chris Livingston
C KAT/Mark Williams
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
-
warriorschamps
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 826
- And1: 723
- Joined: Nov 16, 2015
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
Rapsalot wrote:10-15 games after Klay returns will be a better time to ask.
So you think the Warriors are going to get alot worse with Klay on the floor? If they are contenders now which they are having win 10 of their last 15 last year, going 5-0 in the preseason and 10-1 to start the season. And they aren't just winning they are blowing teams out. Yes they haven't had the toughest schedule but we've seen teams with the same schedule do a lot, lot worse. More to the point the Warriors have championship DNA to rely on something most teams don't have. If the Warriors are like 40-5 are we still going to be asking if they are contenders?
I doubt any team in the league will finish within 5 games of the Warriors 60+ wins this year.
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
-
Peregrine01
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,754
- And1: 7,694
- Joined: Sep 12, 2012
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
warriorschamps wrote:WarriorGM wrote:At this rate it's just a matter of time before the detractors start whining it's so unfair that Curry is playing with Gary Payton II who makes the Warriors a stacked team.
Yep that's so unfair. It's when everybody were saying Klay & Green were bums but they win the chip then all of sudden Curry had too much help. Gotta love it. Can't make this stuff up.
Now Curry has Klay, Dray, Wiggins, GPII, Poole, etc, etc. Too much talent. Hand hat man the chip NOW!
Remember when everybody said Wiggins suck and nobody wanted him. Wiggins is a classic example of what happens when you play with a superstar who is empowering and not demeaning. But I will let haters carry on as they are clueless.
We always gave Tim Duncan so much credit just for the way he carried himself as a "superstar". Always putting the team before himself. It's time we give Curry that same respect.
It's really crazy how so many players remade or revitalized their careers playing for the Warriors. Obviously says a lot about Curry but also their system.
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
-
Karate Diop
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,427
- And1: 11,386
- Joined: May 19, 2017
-
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
BoatsNZones wrote:Karate Diop wrote:Contenders? lol... They're not even a lock for the playoffs...
Tough take right now. The Warriors are forever the underdog, even after being the greatest team in NBA history. Don't sleep on a team with a still prime Curry when he has help.
They've played well against very lackluster competition. Better than I thought, that's for sure, but let's see how they fare against the better teams in the league.
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
- WESCO
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,396
- And1: 996
- Joined: Jan 06, 2006
- Location: Face Palm
Re: Are the Warriors contenders?
warriorschamps wrote:Rapsalot wrote:10-15 games after Klay returns will be a better time to ask.
I doubt any team in the league will finish within 5 games of the Warriors 60+ wins this year.
I'm a homer too but too soon....


