YogurtProducer wrote:Boogie! wrote:YogurtProducer wrote:Pascal was also like the 3rd option behind Kawhi and Lowry.
I would be happy if we could get to a point where Barnes is the 1st guy, OG/Siakam/FVV are kind of the 2nd/3rd/4th guys (kind of like Lowry, Siakam, and Ibaka were the secondary scoring options).
We need to find the "Super" role players like Gasol and Green, and likely one of Siakam/OG have to play a looooot more with the bench.
Siakam was second option to kawhi. Lowry really deferred to both of them. But that was lowrys strength was being able to make others better.
But I agree there needs to be a hierarchy… and we do have super role players… the problem is they all think they’re the new kawhi… Barnes can be kawhi… siakam can be siakam… fvv can be 4th option behind og… fvv a primary role should be catch and shoot and making sure everyone else eats first… instead he’s here chasing awards
Siakam really was not. He was almost never asked to create at any given time.
2018-19 Raptors Shot Attempts (per game , then per 36)Kawhi - 18.8 / 19.9
Serge - 11.9 / 15.7
Siakam - 11.8 / 13.4
Lowry - 11.4 / 12.0
BUT then you also consider usage rateKawhi - 30.3
Serge - 22.9
Siakam - 20.8
Lowry - 19.6
And then assists per gameLowry - 8.7
FVV - 4.8
Gasol - 3.9
Kawhi - 3.3
Siakam - 3.1
So it is quite clear Siakam was NOT the 2nd option. We had two different and distinct offenses - the Kawhi ISO get **** down show, and the team offense Lowry/Gasol set up everyone else and Siakam play off those guys. Siakam was never a 2nd option in the traditional sense like you see from PG13/Kawhi in LAC, AD/LBJ in LAL, Durant/Harden in BKN, etc. It was more Kawhi + offence by committee.
Not sure what we’re debating at this point tbh… it’s not about semantics… and you’re right siakam was playing off of people but that’s the point I was making in that he wasn’t asked to carry the team on his own and played within the flow of the offense much like Scottie Barnes… Barnes is averaging 13.5 fga, and scoring 17, pascal averaging 16.9 on 11.8…
Again regardless of how you want to define second option, he was the teams second leading scorer and did it at a very efficient rate… therefore again I trust pascal to be an efficient player if given less of an offensive load… but again this goes back to role definition and played hierarchy… again as I already said lowrycwent from being 1a to being mainly a facilitator and finding his most efficient scorers… gasol was a defender and facilitator… ibaka pick and pop player… everyone got the ball and did exactly what they were supposed to do with it…
Now compare that to our current team… og is currently averaging 18.1 fga… fvv 16… Barnes 13.5… Trent 13.9… and then now we need to add siakam into the mix… we have too many players trying to get their own shots… there’s no deferring no role definition… our most inefficient scorers are taking the most shots and have the most usage…
At some point someone needs to take a step back… everyone can’t be **** kawhi… Lowry was Lowry but even he knew his job wasn’t to score any more vut to make sure he’s making everyone’s job easier…
Instead now you have fvv trying to make all star teams… the sooner these guys are told to take a step back the better… not al of them need to be jacking up shots… at some point people need to be told to do less…
Too many cooks in the kitchen… everyone thinks it’s their time to shine… someone on the team has to realize okay I’m gonna get others involved we’re gonna play as a team… that should be fvv… but he’s too busy chasing his numbers… like I said everyone on this team I has a chip on their shoulder trying to play for themselves and it shows…
This Is the sign of a young rebuilding team… if this team was serious about winning certain players would give up their egos for the better of the team. You can’t have it both ways. You’re either trying to win which involves sacrifice and understanding Roles or you’re rebuilding… but you can’t expect everyone to just be chasing numbers while also trying to win… and it also doesn’t help that everyone is so inefficient doing it.