VanWest82 wrote:It seems to me that there are two lines of thought going on here that aren't necessarily the same: 1. Raptors need to bring in better quality, bigger centers; 2. Raptors just need to make sure they play the bigs they already have. Both of these are attempts to push back on the idea that we should be going small as much as possible.
I'm in the 2nd camp. Precious has struggled at times but he's also showed a ton of defensive potential as VVV illustrated, and Birch is solid on both ends. I think this team really benefits from the added size, particularly in the regular season, as it helps our rebounding, defense, and even offense at times when we need a bigger body to help create space and act as an outlet. Of course, there are also times when it makes sense to go small, just not at the start of games when opposing bigs are fresher/stronger and typically do more damage.
I take issue with that VW.
I literally have had arguments over the need for a guy to be 6'11/7'. Now its become well Precious/Birch is good enough, because the other guys are too small.

None of this is factual. I present the idea that height is of little concern, what matters is are they good players who fit our system. You dont bring a drop back PnR big onto a team built to switch everything, a team that has everyone OREB and when they do, capable to pick up full court. Achiuwa and Birch can do that, and have, and its a big reason why were so elite at transition defense despite counter-intuitively going for alot of OREBs.
Theres this misnomer that just because we play small Spicy is going to be murdered by Cs or whatever. Its a shared duty in our system, no one player (incl Birch/Achiuwa) only takes on Cs or any position in this system. We dont care who defends them (FVV defended Drummond on ~6 possessions, he went 0/1).
The issue is people think using our assets to get marginally better while, pushing our 22 yr old down the order, and forcing us to change our philosophies offensively and defensively, it just sounds CRAZY esp in a developmental yr.