Nuntius wrote:Ryoga Hibiki wrote:Nuntius wrote:
Here's the thing, though. I don't care whether Simmons was hurt about it or not. It doesn't change my argument. My argument is this:
This is not like those times where a star asks a trade away from his small-market franchise. It's not Kawhi asking out of San Antonio or AD asking out of NOLA. This is a big market that has been open to the idea of trading this player that is now refusing to trade him because they haven't found a good enough trade yet. Let's not pretend that the Sixers want to actually keep Simmons. They don't.
How is that even remotely relevant to the topic?
The Sixers have all the rights to check their options and eventually trade Ben if a better option comes out.
And you are extremely moderate on anything about what Ben wants or does, but you don't apply the same method to the team, apparently
Sent from my Nokia 3210 using RealGM mobile app
The poster I was quoting in that comment, rickxdel, said that Simmons and his agent are trying to "strong-arm" the Sixers into a trade. I pointed out that this narrative is inaccurate. The Sixers aren't a small-market trying to keep a star that wants out. They are a big market team who already wants to trade away that "star" (whether Ben Simmons should qualify for a star or not is a separate discussion). Trying to paint the Sixers as that kind of team is trying to spin this situation in a way that benefits the Sixers from a PR standpoint.
From both a contract and a business perspective the Sixers have done nothing wrong here.
Ben Simmons is contracturally obligated to play for the Sixers for FOUR MORE SEASONS, for a total compensation of $140 million (more or less). While I am not a contract lawyer, I am sure that Simmons' representation reviewed the terms of the contract before signing it - which includes the right of the team to trade his contract rights to any other team in the NBA.
Simmons has no contractural or business right to demand a trade. He also has no contractural or business right to withhold services while still being paid under the terms of the contract. I am sure that the terms of this contract are standard for the NBA.
I think it is a JOKE to hold the Sixers in any way responsible for Simmons' continued withholding of services. Being a professional athlete is a pretty good gig. Most players are extremely well compensated in return for their contractural services. It is true that, with the financial rewards of being an athlete comes both responsibilities as well as pressure. It appears that Ben Simmons cannot handle the pressure that comes with being a highly visible, high-profile player. I am certainly not trying to make light of this. We have seen many examples of this recently - athletes like Simone Biles and Naomi Osaka have struggled with the pressure that comes with being a high-profile athlete in the most demanding moments in their respective sports: the Olympics, a Grand Slam tennis event, or in Ben SImmons' case, the NBA playoffs.
Ben SImmons signed a contract that will pay him $140 million over the next 4 years. NOWHERE IN THAT CONTRACT does it say that the team cannot engage in trade talks. NOWHERE IN THAT CONTRACT does it say that the head coach or other players cannot criticize him for his play. This is not up for debate.
The Sixers possess Ben SImmons' contractural rights. He is required to play in order to get paid. The SIxers are under NO OBLIGATION to trade him. NONE. Ben Simmons does not possess the contractural rights to withhold his services while still getting paid. And even if Simmons says that he needs mental health support to fulfill his contractural obligations to the Sixers, if Simmons wants to be paid during this treatment, the Sixers are well within their contractural rights to 1) require Simmons to comply with "reasonable" non-game activities commensurate with being a member of the team, and 2) engage in good-faith efforts to structure his mental health treatment in such a way as to get back on the court playing for the Sixers as quickly as possible.
Everything else that is discussed around this is noise. It is ridiculous that the Sixers are perceived as being in the wrong here.
THEY ARE CONTRACTURALLY ALLOWED TO ENGAGE IN TRADE DISCUSSIONS
THEY ARE CONTRACTURALLY ALLOWED TO CHOOSE IF, WHEN, AND WHERE SIMMONS IS TRADED
THERE IS NO CLAUSE IN THE CONTRACT THAT SAYS THAT SIMMONS CANNOT BE CRITICIZED BY HIS COACH FOR HIS PLAY
But you Benablers (you know who you are) keep apologizing for the guy. Just know that the Sixers HAVE DONE NOTHING WRONG.