RapsFan008 wrote:canada_dry wrote:Its intriguing. A risk, but the picks might make.it a risk worth taking.Johnny Bball wrote:Here's the kind of trade we should be looking for IMO. Love has one more year. I wonder what he has in him and if you could have him come of the bench first and make him a reclamation project to trade in the summer as an expiring a la hordford, westbrook etc. He's big, rebound, and passes/starts the break as well as anyone.
Love, CLE FRP, and Houton's 22 SRP, SAS Spurs 22 SRP for Dragic and Boucher. CLE is great without love and its got me thinking they now have more urgency to move him. two years is a heavy contract and would require at least those picks. The SRPs are bascially late firsts with their records.
http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=yzf8jf3s
But does Cleveland REALLY need another small guard? I understand sexton is out but still. And for how long?
Theyd love to get their hands on a boucher type tho for sure.
Sent from my SM-G960W using RealGM mobile app
Is Cleveland that desperate to get Love off their books? He's obviously a bad contract but I think they're under the tax for now. Unless they want to re-sign Sexton this offseason then yeah they'll be in the luxury tax with Love still on their team.
There's no risk in giving up Dragic and Boucher, and I'm not expecting anything from Love - the prize are the draft assets. Question for the FO is, is that enough compensation for us to go into luxury tax for. I think we'll be a few million over the tax bill if we make this trade.
I don't know but I expect they will be impatient yes. They are playing really well without Love. And I think they will be looking to trade Sexton. Again.
We wouldn't go into the tax with that trade this year. But next year if we can't move him we obviously would be.