Pointgod wrote:AlexanderRight wrote:queridiculo wrote:
Billionaires or anybody with a degree of financial success probably didn't get where they are by flushing money down the toilet or letting assets devalue needlessly.
At some point they're going to cut their losses and move on.
Holding your own franchise hostage to make a point would just be foolish.
Better you do it yourself then to let someone take hostage of you. Am I right? At this point his value can only get higher. Make it clear, announce to the media that he won’t get traded until he sees court time. If Ben never suits up, whatever losses you think the owner will have, Simmons losses will be greater. He’ll have to dig into the luxury tax to make up for the dead weight on the cap in order to keep the team competitive but the money the owner will lose in the short term is nothing compared to the money and leverage he and the owners will lose if they give in to this one man. At this point, principle, respect and setting precedence for the future matters more than the money(which he has a lot of).
That’s not how this works, it’s not how any of this works.
Wow, what a fantastic rebuttal. Idk how I’m gonna be able to refute such a strong and detailed response. Guess owners now are gonna have to pay employees for not working because “that’s not how this works”…