YogurtProducer wrote:EFF3KT wrote:YogurtProducer wrote:?? Is this really the game to crap on Pascal? 21 points on 17 shots, Barnes had 10 points on 11 shots.
He’s been pretty damn good all year offensively outside a stinker against Utah.
He had a decent offensive game but you're missing the point of my post. Barnes cannot be assertive while being on the floor with Pascal. This is the main point I'm trying to make.
The eye test shows Scottie doesn't have the same confidence while on the court with Pascal compared to when Pascal was still recovering (feel free to find numbers to debate this). I don't remember seeing Barnes parked in a corner this often when Pascal was still injured. We saw Scottie rise and take confident mid range jumpers, feasting on the post up and offensive boards, and creating for teammates. The quality of his shots has dropped off because the spacing he was used to on the floor is now compromised with Pascal's re-insertion into the lineup. Is it detrimental to the team? I would say that's unfair to say as Pascal offensively has been solid.
Is it detrimental to Scottie's development? No question.
Pascal is a great offensive player in this league. Against bad teams, he will feast. Against good teams, he will struggle to get his at times but he will still put in his best effort to score and will find a way to get his 20 points.
I'm just of the opinion that this team cannot contend with Pascal as our franchise player. He's proven to be an amazing sidekick, that Robin to a Batman.
Wouldn't it be great to see if Scottie could eventually be our Batman? We've seen some flashes of brilliance that is very rare to see, especially in a rookie.
Ultimately, it could just be that this franchise is stuck inbetween playoff contention and development. We want to win but are not willing to take risks and make changes while adapting our playstyle to our cast, continuing to run our offense through Pascal and Freddy.
I know this a long post but I respect your opinions and your statistic supporting posts so far this season. I feel this entire board is split which is highly representative of what we're seeing translate on the court.
So why is this an issue with Pascal but not with OG? OG has taken more shots per game than Siakam has.
Ans it’s funny to say “against good teams he will struggle” after shooting nearly 50% tonight, or 20 on 15fga against Portland, or 15 on 12fga against Brooklyn… he has one bad game against Utah and that’s really it. Before tonight he was at 17ppg on 60TS%. It’ll be pretty close to that after tonight as well.
The “spacing” thing is funny to bring up considering when Pascal was out he played primarily with Birch and Achiwua who provide 0 spacing. So the spacing thing obviously is not the problem.
Scottie just isn’t that good offensively yet. That’s all there is to to. Early in the year his “big games” were pretty much off offensive rebounds and transition mid range pull-ups (which honestly are terrible shots and bound to come down to earth). Barnes wasn’t initiating anymore before Siakams return than he is now. He simply was hitting his mid range at a ridiculous rate (I think it was at like 70% at one point IIRC).
Barnes is a rookie. Barnes isn’t that good. Barnes has a ton of potential and will be very very good. Force feeding Barnes and not holding him accountable for his terrible defence or his turnovers or his bad decision making and rewarding him with the primary ball handling duties is just not a good use of his development.
Most of his points were in the paint and not off midrange jumpers. In fact, to start the season, it was his elite finishing skill that was sustaining his scoring. His finishing efficiency has tanked in the last handful of games.