SFrush wrote:Scoots1994 wrote:ClutchUp wrote:
Depends on if it's sustainable.
True, but then that's true of every player ever.
His numbers are coming down. I don't think it's sustainable.
It's not the numbers it's the approach.
G17 : Warriors v Raptors
Moderators: Chris Porter's Hair, floppymoose, Sleepy51
Re: G17 : Warriors v Raptors
-
Scoots1994
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,277
- And1: 1,125
- Joined: Jun 24, 2018
-
Re: G17 : Warriors v Raptors
It's not the numbers it's the approach.
Re: G17 : Warriors v Raptors
-
Money_
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,030
- And1: 224
- Joined: Dec 02, 2014
-
Re: G17 : Warriors v Raptors
Scoots1994 wrote:SFrush wrote:Scoots1994 wrote:
True, but then that's true of every player ever.
His numbers are coming down. I don't think it's sustainable.
It's not the numbers it's the approach.
Wiggins is a reliable 18-20pts a night player, and 30 if you need it from him.
If he disappears in the playoffs the way HB did, then I'll concede that he and Barnes are comparable.
Until then, I see him as a much more reliable option than HB ever was.
And Barnes is a damn good player, Wiggins is just better.
Return to Golden State Warriors