What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
Moderators: Domejandro, infinite11285, Harry Garris, ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake
What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,501
- And1: 3,728
- Joined: Jan 27, 2013
What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
Is this in the back of your mind? Or just mine?
I'm one of Kobe's biggest detractors, however (I'm aging myself here), I watched Shaq from his rookie season. He was at the best combination of mobility and strength, and his conditioning peaked, however was he really that much better? Shaq really played at an MVP level from 93-94 to 02-03, and was top 10 in the league 92-93 and 03-05 (possibly 05-06 but by the playoffs he was a lower tier all-star imo).
The difference: Kobe Bryant.
Am I nuts?
(To a lesser degree, I credit Phil Jackson, and not facing the Stockton-Malone Jazz.)
I'm one of Kobe's biggest detractors, however (I'm aging myself here), I watched Shaq from his rookie season. He was at the best combination of mobility and strength, and his conditioning peaked, however was he really that much better? Shaq really played at an MVP level from 93-94 to 02-03, and was top 10 in the league 92-93 and 03-05 (possibly 05-06 but by the playoffs he was a lower tier all-star imo).
The difference: Kobe Bryant.
Am I nuts?
(To a lesser degree, I credit Phil Jackson, and not facing the Stockton-Malone Jazz.)
Now that's the difference between first and last place.
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,677
- And1: 4,847
- Joined: Feb 18, 2012
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
I read here that any all star wing would've also won with Shaq, so Kobe wasn't all that.
screw these absolute garbage refs
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
- Dr Aki
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,292
- And1: 29,109
- Joined: Mar 03, 2008
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
Shaq played with a ton of all star wings
He didn't achieve success until Kobe/Phil and then with DWade.
Based on that, Shaq needed at least a superstar wing to get him rings, and not just any all star wing.
And not just on the offensive end either, Kobe and Wade were elite defensive players in the one package as well.
He didn't achieve success until Kobe/Phil and then with DWade.
Based on that, Shaq needed at least a superstar wing to get him rings, and not just any all star wing.
And not just on the offensive end either, Kobe and Wade were elite defensive players in the one package as well.
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,238
- And1: 4,230
- Joined: Dec 15, 2014
- Location: I can't tell you. I'm an investigator.
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
You are wrong. Shaq was the finals MVP for a reason, Kobe was the 2nd option on those teams for a reason. Also he didn't play with tonne of all star wings, the only other guy was Penny, unless you're counting Lebron when Shaq was way past his prime lol.
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
-
- Junior
- Posts: 378
- And1: 468
- Joined: Jun 25, 2015
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
Kobe & Shaq needed each other. It's as simple as that.
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,417
- And1: 10,140
- Joined: Dec 22, 2011
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
it can be simultaneously true that Shaq was the best player on the team and also that he still needed Kobe to win the titles
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,379
- And1: 10,184
- Joined: Jun 13, 2017
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
00-02 was pretty clearly Shaq's peak. Kobe was semi injured in 00 and only an all star yet the Lakers still won the title that year.
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
- Grumpy Heat Fan
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,191
- And1: 8,302
- Joined: Dec 09, 2011
- Location: Miami, Florida
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
therealozzykhan wrote:You are wrong. Shaq was the finals MVP for a reason, Kobe was the 2nd option on those teams for a reason. Also he didn't play with tonne of all star wings, the only other guy was Penny, unless you're counting Lebron when Shaq was way past his prime lol.
You forgot Dwyane Wade and the championship Shaq won with him?
"As for me personally, I don't truly care how much I make these days, my main focus is on playing for a winner." - Dirk Nowitzki, July 2016
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,448
- And1: 9,097
- Joined: Mar 06, 2016
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
Who got the bigger defensive matchups and attention?
Dikembe Mutumbo, Yao Ming, Greg Ostertag, Rik Smits, Vlade Divac, David Robinson, Tim Duncan, Arvydas Sabonis, Ben Wallace
Aaron McKie, Cuttino Mobley, Jeff Hornacek, Jalen Rose, Doug Christie, Sean Elliot, Bruce Bowen, Steve Smith, Rip Hamilton
Dikembe Mutumbo, Yao Ming, Greg Ostertag, Rik Smits, Vlade Divac, David Robinson, Tim Duncan, Arvydas Sabonis, Ben Wallace
Aaron McKie, Cuttino Mobley, Jeff Hornacek, Jalen Rose, Doug Christie, Sean Elliot, Bruce Bowen, Steve Smith, Rip Hamilton
East #1 Draft Picks: Fultz, Banchero, Wiggins, Cuninigham
West #1 Draft Picks: Edwards, WIlliamson, Ayton, Towns
West #1 Draft Picks: Edwards, WIlliamson, Ayton, Towns
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,353
- And1: 19,897
- Joined: Jul 11, 2018
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
Shaq averaged 38/17 in the 2000 nba finals while Kobe averaged 15.6.
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
- ImSlower
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,681
- And1: 6,414
- Joined: Jan 06, 2011
- Location: STL-ish
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
Kobe was amazing.
Shaq was a world beater.
Shaq was a world beater.
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,961
- And1: 4,522
- Joined: Jun 25, 2004
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
Grumpy Heat Fan wrote:therealozzykhan wrote:You are wrong. Shaq was the finals MVP for a reason, Kobe was the 2nd option on those teams for a reason. Also he didn't play with tonne of all star wings, the only other guy was Penny, unless you're counting Lebron when Shaq was way past his prime lol.
You forgot Dwyane Wade and the championship Shaq won with him?
I think the op is arguing Wade is better than Kobe because Shaq was worse in 2006 than he was during the Kobe championship years.
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 42,313
- And1: 22,209
- Joined: Oct 04, 2015
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
Dr Aki wrote:Shaq played with a ton of all star wings
He didn't achieve success until Kobe/Phil and then with DWade.
Based on that, Shaq needed at least a superstar wing to get him rings, and not just any all star wing.
And not just on the offensive end either, Kobe and Wade were elite defensive players in the one package as well.
He made the NBA finals in 1995 in his 3rd year...
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
- Dr Aki
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,292
- And1: 29,109
- Joined: Mar 03, 2008
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
dhsilv2 wrote:Dr Aki wrote:Shaq played with a ton of all star wings
He didn't achieve success until Kobe/Phil and then with DWade.
Based on that, Shaq needed at least a superstar wing to get him rings, and not just any all star wing.
And not just on the offensive end either, Kobe and Wade were elite defensive players in the one package as well.
He made the NBA finals in 1995 in his 3rd year...
maybe your definition of success is a little different to mine
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 42,313
- And1: 22,209
- Joined: Oct 04, 2015
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
Dr Aki wrote:dhsilv2 wrote:Dr Aki wrote:Shaq played with a ton of all star wings
He didn't achieve success until Kobe/Phil and then with DWade.
Based on that, Shaq needed at least a superstar wing to get him rings, and not just any all star wing.
And not just on the offensive end either, Kobe and Wade were elite defensive players in the one package as well.
He made the NBA finals in 1995 in his 3rd year...
maybe your definition of success is a little different to mine
If it's title or nothing...that's an insane view of success. Basically makes the term meaningless when discussing players. Shaq lost back to back years to the eventual champ on the magic. Making a finals and conference finals. That IS success, it's a LOT of it.
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,904
- And1: 5,665
- Joined: Feb 21, 2020
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
Kobe was a pretty clear #2 in 2000 (although he did bail Shaq out in game 7 against Portland), but he led the playoffs in both '01 and '02 in 4th quarter scoring @ 8 ppg on 49% shooting. He was the best closer in the game and you couldn't have just replaced him with Vince Carter or Ray Allen and expect a 3peat like some people seem to insinuate.
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
- Dr Aki
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,292
- And1: 29,109
- Joined: Mar 03, 2008
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
dhsilv2 wrote:Dr Aki wrote:dhsilv2 wrote:
He made the NBA finals in 1995 in his 3rd year...
maybe your definition of success is a little different to mine
If it's title or nothing...that's an insane view of success. Basically makes the term meaningless when discussing players. Shaq lost back to back years to the eventual champ on the magic. Making a finals and conference finals. That IS success, it's a LOT of it.
teams hang championship banners, not lost-to-the-eventual-champion banners
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,539
- And1: 5,562
- Joined: Mar 05, 2016
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
Teams also hang division champions bannersDr Aki wrote:dhsilv2 wrote:Dr Aki wrote:
maybe your definition of success is a little different to mine
If it's title or nothing...that's an insane view of success. Basically makes the term meaningless when discussing players. Shaq lost back to back years to the eventual champ on the magic. Making a finals and conference finals. That IS success, it's a LOT of it.
teams hang championship banners, not lost-to-the-eventual-champion banners
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 42,313
- And1: 22,209
- Joined: Oct 04, 2015
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
Dr Aki wrote:dhsilv2 wrote:Dr Aki wrote:
maybe your definition of success is a little different to mine
If it's title or nothing...that's an insane view of success. Basically makes the term meaningless when discussing players. Shaq lost back to back years to the eventual champ on the magic. Making a finals and conference finals. That IS success, it's a LOT of it.
teams hang championship banners, not lost-to-the-eventual-champion banners
You know teams DO hang conference championship banners, right? But you're now confusing PLAYER success measured by their team, and team success. They two aren't the same thing
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
- Dr Aki
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,292
- And1: 29,109
- Joined: Mar 03, 2008
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Re: What if we were all wrong, and Kobe was the main reason the Lakers won?
BloodNinja wrote:Teams also hang division champions bannersDr Aki wrote:dhsilv2 wrote:
If it's title or nothing...that's an insane view of success. Basically makes the term meaningless when discussing players. Shaq lost back to back years to the eventual champ on the magic. Making a finals and conference finals. That IS success, it's a LOT of it.
teams hang championship banners, not lost-to-the-eventual-champion banners
sorry, i was unaware some teams did such a thing