Clyde_Style wrote:Buttah304 wrote:god shammgod wrote:this year's version of julius is very different than last year. we're getting 2 years ago julius right now. he's shooting 41 and 33 from 3. last year he shot 45/41. that guy helped win us games. the guy from 2 years ago got us the 8th pick. if he doesn't regain his last year form forget about that discount he supposedly took, he's unmovable for value.
A team would be paying big money for the 6th man version of NO Randle where he probably scores 20 a night beating up on 2nd units. His current price makes him unmovable in that regard. Like many have pointed out he legitimately struggles when the ball isn’t in his hands. It’s almost as if he’s not sure what his place is on the court.
The million dollar question is what would the Knicks have given him this summer if (a) they saw how much he would regress and (b) how much progress Obi would show.
Except they did know he would regress. It's called the playoffs. That's the litmus test of your value. And they still paid him based on his regular season production. Epic fail
I don’t buy that the knew he would regress. If anything, paying him a year early and going out and getting Kemba and Fournier to boost the offense is speaking to the contrary. This front office probably felt that Randle was setup to fail (to a degree with the lack of weapons) and invested in him by trying to plug holes in the boat. In their minds they could still get the “ALL NBA” Randle and possibly an even better version by equipping him with players to lessen the burden/weight of carrying an entire team in a playoff series.
Having said that Clyde, if they felt he would regress to THIS magnitude, extending him to 4/117 when Obi showed life in the ATL series is absolutely an epic fail I agree.