robillionaire wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:robillionaire wrote:I mean it’s easy for us to sit back like it’s a my gm on 2k and say they should have blown it up traded the most improved player for draft picks the summer after being a 4 seed and tanked and fired Thibs who just won coach of the year (he isn’t a tank coach) etc etc but if put yourself in the shoes of Leon Rose, who I presume enjoys having a job and doesn’t want to be unemployed, you’d see that you’re not being reasonable and nobody would have done this in reality
And also you’d have to deal with the fanbase who would have insisted that if we kept the 4 seed team together and kept building on it we could be contenders during your whole tank effort which wouldn’t go over nearly as well as 2015-2020 did
Jerry West advised the Clippers to trade Blake Griffin after a jersey retirement ceremony and promises of making him a Clipper for life.
They traded him, and they now have two of the best players in the game in Kawhi Leonard and Paul George.
The best front offices do what's best for the franchise. And that includes sometimes making unpopular decisions, like the Warriors trading Monta Ellis for Andrew Bogut.
The Knicks were never able to build a contender around Melo partly because they didn't amnesty Amar'e Stoudemire. Yes, it would have been a PR nightmare at the time. He had just made All-NBA, and had supposedly made the Knicks relevant again. But it would have been the right move. Nobody cared about Amar'e just a year after the Knicks amnestied Billups.
They didn’t just trade Griffin for picks so they could tank they got back Tobias Harris who is better than Griffin, and never finished below .500 or tanked in the process. If they tanked Kawhi probably doesn’t go there, they made the playoffs
If we were trading Randle for another good player with a goal to continue trying to win we could do that but that doesn’t seem to be what people are suggesting
The unpopular move was keeping Randle when this fanbase wanted to trade him for Batum and the unpopular decision is now to keep Randle and I applaud them for staying the course
Keeping Randle is not the unpopular move now lol. He's still getting MVP chants at the Garden
I think most Knicks fans still want to keep him today. A growing section doesn't.
You're right that keeping him was the unpopular move a year and a half ago.
Harris was not perceived to be as good as Griffin when the trade was made. You're right that they didn't trade him just for picks, but they mostly traded him for cap space, and they got a player in return that turned out to be better than what the general perception was at the time.
In any case, there's more than one way to skin a cat. Depends on your assets, the market, player movement etc. I think we're in a period now where most established stars are where they want to be, and the younger generation of stars have many years left on their contracts. Dame is the one difference-maker who could be available, but he'll be 32 at the end of the season, there will be plenty of suitors (some with better trade packages than us) and he's probably better suited to be a #2 as well.
I guess we'll see how Randle's career pans out.