TerrenceClarke wrote:Dame is a fool if he wants to come here. We should be on his FOH list.
And he should be on ours. He aint saving us
Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi
TerrenceClarke wrote:Dame is a fool if he wants to come here. We should be on his FOH list.
god shammgod wrote:Capn'O wrote:
i did. so i hope one of you babies shat on you.
Capn'O wrote:
x2 it's the weekend who ruins there weekends by watching RJ Barrett.Capn'O wrote:
Jimmit79 wrote:x2 it's the weekend who ruins there weekends by watching RJ Barrett.Capn'O wrote:
Sent from my HD1905 using Tapatalk
BBALLER4FR wrote:So who plays well with Randle? I think going forward we really have to ask that question instead of who can we get to play with Randle. Because if we find that no one on our rotation plays well with him, then the next few years are going to be full of roster turnover and awful basketball.
Jimmit79 wrote:Nuggets are just better then Knicks there are tons of teams same lvl or better then Knicks this year and boy has RJ regressed we probably won't even get caruso for rj at this point.
Sent from my HD1905 using Tapatalk
god shammgod wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:New Rule
GT Maker must make the next Game Thread whether we win or lose
Mwah ha ha ha ha
i made 3 out of 4 this week because morale is so low here. somebody else gotta pick up a little of the slack for ol sham.
thebuzzardman wrote:RJ, IQ, Obi. The future. 65 combined minutes, 25 points.
lol.
Feel free to add in "But Mitch is good"
86 minutes, 29 points.
Capn'O wrote:Draft thread updated btw. We currently own picks 10, 20, and 42.