pcbothwel wrote:payitforward wrote:pcbothwel wrote:1) A max Beal will never be as bad as Russ...
If you think, on the 2 guys' careers, that Bradley Beal is a better player than Russell Westbrook, it'll be hard to have a rational discussion, because he hasn't been nearly as good, nowhere close to what Westbrook has done. Brad has been a terrific player, especially for the 5 years prior to this one. Russ has been better. Way better.
For that matter, if you think Beal was better than Westbrook last year, when they were both Wizards, then that too indicates an emotional rather than a rational assessment of the two players.
![]()
I'm not arguing about their careers, Im talking about now. And to your latter point...
Lets look the previous two year (Russ in Houston and DC)
Beal (Per 36): 31 / 4.5 / 5 with a TS of 59% and BPM of 3.1
Russ (Per 36): 24.5 / 10 / 9.5 with a TS of 52% and BPM of 2.5
Beal essentially gave you 6.5 more points on 2.5 FGA and 1.5 more FTA (TS of 105% !!!). That cannot be understated.
Now, you could argue about the additional assist and rebounds, but I would counter with Russ bringing down team rebounding and assist in exchange for his numbers. I.E. I dont think those numbers added much of anything.
Finally, we cant ignore that Russ limits your team/rotation because of his inability to play off the ball. You live and die with Russ. Beal has shown the ability to play the lead guard role as well as elite off-ball action. Beal can fit into many lineups/roles, where Russ simply cant.
Oh, and as bad as Beal has been this year, you dont seem to bring up that Russ has had a 30% drop in rebounds AND assist from last year while his turnovers have stayed the same. Out of the 15 players with minutes for LAL this year, Russ is #13 in +/- at -7.2...
Our offense has been terrible this year, but with the roster and coaching turnover I think we owe WUJ a few more weeks to install a bit more nuance and get our players better looks.
You're wasting your breath. PIF will never acknowledge that individual rebounding numbers overstate a player's impact. He is going to look at Westbrook's 10 rebounds and game and count it as 5 extra possessions, which will overwhelm Beal's superior efficiency at everything else. He'll disregard Beal's spacing, the secondary effects of Westbrook's turnovers (not just the lost opportunity, but the likely fast break in the other direction), and the fact that the team rebounded worse with Westbrook on the floor.



























