snadler wrote:?s=21
?s=21
Good news: that horrible proposed trade won’t happen.
Bad news: we still stink.
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
snadler wrote:?s=21

spree2kawhi wrote:Deeeez Knicks wrote:K-DOT wrote:If he starts falling off at 33, 34 and we've given him the 90 million extension he wants, that's the nightmare scenario, cause we'd be paying him until he's 37
I'm just gonna keep saying, it's ridiculous to want us to rush into a Dame trade without planning ahead, cause if you trade for Dame, you still need help, and you don't have time to wait to get him it. People can say being hesitant is the same mistake we made with Chris Paul, but let's be real, CP3 and Randle isn't winning us a chip, and he is declining. Maybe not as drastic as some people projected, but still. If all we did was trade for CP3, and extended him until 2025, we would not be in a good place
And I don't think marginal moves are gonna cut it. Like, who else would we be able to get? Simmons is probably the best player on the market, but him and Randle are an awkward fit, and if you trade Randle for him, you still run into the problem that Dame/Simmons/Fournier is not good enough. Maybe we could trade for some of the Pacers' guys, like Sabonis might be good enough as a 2nd/3rd option with Randle, or we could go for LeVert/Turner, but we'd have to use up the rest of our assets to do so
Dame/Rose
Lamb (or Holiday)
LeVert
Randle/Knox
Turner/Sims
And like, I like that starting group, I think if Randle plays up to his potential on defense, Dame's the only weak link and LeVert has potential to be a good tertiary ball handler, but there'd be literally no bench. When Knox is your 2nd best bench player, you're in trouble (and he's only still here cause I don't consider him to be an asset), and we'd have no 1sts in the forseeable future to get young, cheap bench guys, we'd be reliant on vet mins and UDFAs.
Yea, we would pretty much have to rebuild the team around Dame since the pieces dont fit great and we would be missing a lot of others. It wouldnt be easy.
I dont see Randle/Dame as an ideal pairing. Even without Dame its hard to see how we can build around Randle to get to that level. Probably need to look to move Randle either way, although it wont happen.
When I was pleading for a rebuild here two years ago as an option if we didn’t land Kawhi, KD or Butler, I already told y’all that Randle was not a player you’d want to start a team with. You don’t start building a house around the windows. We should’ve rebuilt. Randle then exploded from bad to very good, I get that. But he’s just not that prime talent you need, still he’ll occupy the ball, turn it over a lot, shoot mediocre numbers from outside. If we had Dame to go with him, things would look better.
Ideally he’s a finisher and players like Steph or Booker create his scoring options. But if he always plays like Melo, you’ll have to face the reality that even the original couldn’t get it done.
What do we do now? Randle is a nice player, but we need our 25-27 ppg scorer to take the ball away from him. Do you think we could get Dame?
Guano wrote:Fourni3r forgetting he has Bob cousy handles
Woodsanity wrote:Imagine trusting a team with World B Flat on it without Lebron keeping him in check.
seren wrote:Another Randle candidate: Philly. They want a top 25 player. Randle made the all star team last year so it works. Randle for Simmons

RandlesCornrows wrote:TO NYK: Ben Simmons
To PHI: Julius Randle, Jalen Brunson, Reggie Bullock
To DAL: Tobias Harris
F N 11 wrote:RandlesCornrows wrote:TO NYK: Ben Simmons
To PHI: Julius Randle, Jalen Brunson, Reggie Bullock
To DAL: Tobias Harris
Everybody wins but Randle can’t be traded until February I think.
seren wrote:Another Randle candidate: Philly. They want a top 25 player. Randle made the all star team last year so it works. Randle for Simmons
RHODEY wrote:Buy low sell high...Knicks could go for Zion....let him sit out the season ... risky but why not?
Richard4444 wrote:RHODEY wrote:Buy low sell high...Knicks could go for Zion....let him sit out the season ... risky but why not?
Pelicans will not sell. They are more desperate than us for a little hope...

RHODEY wrote:Richard4444 wrote:RHODEY wrote:Buy low sell high...Knicks could go for Zion....let him sit out the season ... risky but why not?
Pelicans will not sell. They are more desperate than us for a little hope...
Even if they felt Zion wasn't going to stick around after his contract lapses?
RHODEY wrote:Richard4444 wrote:RHODEY wrote:Buy low sell high...Knicks could go for Zion....let him sit out the season ... risky but why not?
Pelicans will not sell. They are more desperate than us for a little hope...
Even if they felt Zion wasn't going to stick around after his contract lapses?
Richard4444 wrote:RHODEY wrote:Richard4444 wrote:
Pelicans will not sell. They are more desperate than us for a little hope...
Even if they felt Zion wasn't going to stick around after his contract lapses?
If Zion refuses the max and gets the QO, he has to be committed to an asylum. He is some pounds away from early retirement.