Knox wrote:Richard4444 wrote:[gfycat][/gfycat]Chanel Bomber wrote:I'm not mad at us for passing on DeRozan tbh. I don't know that he would've had the same level of impact on this team. I don't necessarily think it'd have been a good move.
I'm mad at us for signing Fournier. That move was substraction by addition.
DeRozan would not have the same space he gets in Chicago in a Knicks starting team. Instead of Lonzo, Lavine, Vuc, Caruso, he would play with no reliable 3 pt threat in Randle, Mitch/Noel, RJ, and whatever PG we could get with no Cap Space left. Maybe the plan was to bring Payton back for the MLE.
Instead of chasing Simmons we could of got Lonzo for cheap. He isn’t Simmons but he does his part
Lonzo is a great defender but he is the opposite of Simmons at the offensive end. Simmons is a driver and a great playmaker in the half court. Lonzo is a great playmaker in the open court and a shooter in the half court.
Thibs likes a driver/slasher PG to open the defense. And Randle plays a slow game while Lonzo plays faster.
I dont think we target Lonzo.



















