Saberestar wrote:Ghost of Kleine wrote:https://www.google.com/amp/s/syndication.bleacherreport.com/amp/10021163-blazers-rumors-damian-lillard-only-player-unavailable-at-nba-trade-deadline.amp.html
With everyone except Lillard actually being available at the trade deadline, I actually think we should revisit the possibility of trading for Covington and another small piece. Covington can be like Crowder 2.0 off the bench for us. How about:
Saric/ Smith/ 1st for Covington and McLemore or Covington and Snell??
The beauty of trading Saric and Smith would be matching salary, So that we still maintain our ability to add even more depth via the buyout pool even after the trade.
But imagine adding Covington and Snell ( or McLemore) to our current bench! ........................again:
Payne/ Shamet/ Covington/ Johnson/ McGee.
Payton/ Snell/ Nader/ Buyout ? / Covington?
Payne- Offense.
Shamet- Offense.
Covington- Defense.
Johnson- Offense.
McGee- Defense.
That's great balance from our bench.
Snell or McLemore could be our 6th man microwave scorer!! Then we just fill the 3rd string 4/5 with a buyout big. Good to go for the championship!

These players are horrible, they probably will be out of the league pretty soon.
Snell averages 2.0 ppg and 0.7 assists. Didn't you know him?
McLemore...I can't even. His next stop China.
Nader is better than those two guys. Imagine how bad they are.
Regarding Covington, he is not the same player that he was anymore. He is a joke on defense and on offense he can't dribble, he can't pass, just a chucker. People who hates Crowder (who is much better than him) would kill themselves watching Covington doing what he is doing for the Blazers since last year.
Appreciate your effort but those three players would not help us at all.
I appreciate and deeply respect your perspectives always man. But I think you may be judging these players a bit harshly.
Tony Snell-
Would have value to us as a sniper for our
3rd rotation sniper He's still a 39% 3 pt shooter and a career 84% free throw shooter as well that has good size at 6'7 with a 7 ft wingspan. He's a reliable defender that knows and accepts his role ( however small) without complaints. For our 3rd string rotation that will most likely only play against scrubs and washouts or young inexperienced players, he'd do just fine. So yes, actually fairly I'm familiar with him. Also whilst he's not really known for anything outside of his shot selection that had him elite from three for many seasons ( 56% from three for Atlanta before being traded to Portland and accepting a reduced role/ minutes). He'd still be a very good sniper and late game free throw option for us off the bench. Honestly, If there's a better low cost option at around $2 million that could definitively boost our three point game, hit free throws at 84% or better, be fine with a minimal role, and is still a solid perimeter defender, I'm absolutely open to it? But currently. I'm not seeing who that'd be though?
Ben McLemore-
McLemore is still a decent defender that can hold his own against 1-3 and is still a really good long range shooter. He still has size, athleticism ( 42' vertical) , and in the right situation with a good coach ( and with someone like Paul mentoring him at times) could really elevate his game. Even in his sporadic 12 minutes (average) per game, McLemore shot around 45% for the blazers this season, and is a career 36% 3 pt shooter. He also has been shooting around 85% from the free throw line. He still ( in the right situation/ under a better coach) has the potential to be an elite complimentary scorer off the bench. So at 2 million and as an expiring, I think in a better and more stable situation ( like ours) he's definitely got solid value for a 3rd rotation scorer.
As for Nader, I could like him more if he wasn't often injured or sidelined because of repetitive knee injuries, etc. Besides, I'm not even talking about swapping Nader in this suggestion, so he essentially could still play alongside of them at times if needed. I'm talking about a 3rd string SG option for either Snell or McLemore as an additional scorer/ shooter off the bench.
Robert Covington-
Covington is still a very good defender. Here's a good article ( from this season in Portland) on his defensive impact:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.si.com/nba/trailblazers/.amp/analysis/does-robert-covington-have-a-legitimate-case-for-all-defenseCovington's 255 total deflections during his first season in Portland led the league, per NBA.com/stats. He ranked second to Fred Van Vleet in deflections per game, ahead of predatory ballhawks like T.J. McConnell, Jimmy Butler, Matisse Thybulle and Marcus Smart.
It wasn't just Covington's frequent knocks, tips and swipes mucking up the opposition's attack. Just six other players in basketball this season – including Jusuf Nurkic – managed his 2.2 percent steal rate and 3.4 block percent block rate, per data compiled at Stathead Basketball. More impressive is that Covington joins Thybulle as the only non-bigs in that exclusive company.
All that created chaos makes Covington one of the most impactful off-ball defenders in the league. BBall Index's number-crunching and data-mining vault him to a plane all his own in Defensive LEBRON among players classified as "helpers."
BBall Index (@The_BBall_Index) Tweeted:
Defensive Impact for players in our Helper Defensive Role
- Up-Down shows defensive impact per 100 possessions
- Left-Right shows aggregate defensive impact (minutes matter)
Explore the free database:
https://t.co/RZfZgQWoC8Read about LEBRON:
https://t.co/w5pmQihHyu https://t.co/3mdPZfHxqq ?s=20
I get that he's slower ( at 30 yrs old) than he used to be, And not a realistic consideration for all defensive selection, But he's still very solid as a disruptive defender. And I honestly believe that the bulk of his struggles are a result of his situation in Portland, and Billups obviously not being a good coach. I believe in a situation like ours under Williams and playing with Paul, Crowder, McGee, etc. Covington could be rejuvenated and reclaim much of what he may have lost in a bad situation in Portland. Now everyone is talking about Thad Young as a primary option for his defense and he's fine in that regard. But really when you compare the two statistically, it's a trade off:
https://stathead.com/basketball/pcm_finder.cgi?player_id2=covinro01&player_id1=youngth01&sum=0&request=1I do like his potential fit here as an expiring option though. And think he'd be really solid defensively for OUR BENCH between Shamet and Johnson and alongside McGee as the other defensive presence. It also doesn't hurt that he shoots 35% from three as opposed to Young's 33%. But I do think in our situation he could experience a renaissance to his career. He could be our Crowder off the bench for a single season?? Do you really not like that bench lineup I suggested with the offensive/ defensive balance it'd offer? Not to mention Covingtons' veteran leadership?