cladden wrote:I root for Moody as much as the next guy but for a supposed knock-down shooter he has not shown even flashes of being able to score in the NBA. I don't mind making him learn some hard lessons tbh. Chiozza, as useless as he is in most ways at least can make a shot when it's a good look. Moody has a troubling lack of quickness to me and has been historically bad on offense.
Its not hard to figure out - he's a rhythm shooter and he's playing in short intervals with 80% of those minutes being garbage time minutes. Because even a cursory look at him in GLeague vs NBA shows the difference and importance of rhythm. As I just said in this thread, how many players that currently get minutes on this team looked good tonight? The players that did look good (Kuminga, sometimes Looney and Nemo) are guys that don't rely on their teammates. GP was looking bad until the garbage time 4th too.. because all his cutting means nothing if we aren't finding him.
No one who pushed for Moody ever said he was good in isolation or he'd fit well with the backups. That was the entire point of wanting him - he doesn't need the ball, but he's got elite 3&D potential. After tonight he'll have played about 15% of his minutes (130) with one of (or both) of Draymond/Curry on the court.
I'm not sure if you were serious comparing Chiozza's mess of a jumper to Moody's, but considering Chiozza averages more than 3 minutes a set and has an average of a defender being 7.3ft away from him when he shoots 3s - beating the nearest Warrior by a full 2ft and Moody by 3.4 - you might expect better results from the 27 year old with the more favorable variables that stays with the team full time than the 19 year old who doesn't have those benefits