Colbinii wrote:Doctor MJ wrote:As I say all of that, I will say that his run as Phoenix GM did not go well. Much of that blame goes to Sarver as owner, but I do think that a lot of what's special about Kerr is the way he continues to learn and grow. Maybe he would have been a great coach if he'd just started anywhere a decade earlier, but maybe not.
I dont refute this but let's start with this.
Sarver is a cheap ass and P.O.S. humanLook at the moves Kerr made once he began.
Draft two later 1sts [One of which is Rudy Fernandez] and trades Rudy and James Jones for Cash.
Trades Kurt Thomas and 2 Firsts for nothing.
But look at his good moves:
Signed Grant Hill
Traded for Shaq
Traded for Goran Dragic
Honestly, I don't think he was bad. He was working for a maxed [Salary Cap] team, had little resources and his disposal and tried to make improvements around the edges.
I'm with you for all the Sarver competence bashing. I can't deny that I tend to have evil thoughts about owners that mess up their own franchise. I'll also say I find it to be particularly fascinating when they've been successful in other domains without glaring nepotism - with Vivek being the guy I'm thinking of here, privileged but also seemingly a legit badass prior to getting involved with basketball.
Re: "Traded for Shaq". Of course that's the only move that really matters to me, and it was the wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong move. It's entirely possible that this wasn't so much something Kerr pushed for but just an option that Sarver ended up championing, but the way the Suns tore apart SSOL is something I will never stop screaming about because it was so f-ing obvious at the time to me that it was the way forward, and it was backwards-ass NBA people who influenced the Suns to give it up.