76ciology wrote:I think what differentiates him for other top players is there’s less variance to it. Like there’s like 90+% chance that you’ll get KD, Steph or Giannis you know every game. As inconsistent Iverson was back then, Embiid’s performance and availability has a higher variance IMO.
This is just pure selection bias.
Just from this year, Steph has gone...
4-21 for 12 points.
2-10 for 12 points.
6-15 for 15 points.
6-20 for 18 points (against us, no less).
5-21 for 21 points.
All of those players you mention have their share of bad games. You just don't watch them night in and night out. If you did, you wouldn't see a player that's wildly more consistent.
Let's not even talk about your habit of using DBPM to assess defense. It's basically one step from saying rebounds and blocks measure a player's defensive contributions.
Tomjas wrote:Embiid is really hard to build around
Who's easier to build around?
You need ballhandlers and spacing (which almost everyone needs, see Luka struggling this year because his team sucks from deep and driving lanes are closed).
And that's about it. Embiid can cover weaker perimeter defenders better than almost anyone not named Gobert.
Every NBA player needs adequate shooting around them or teams can just collapse and trap/double them. Almost every NBA player needs a secondary ballhandler so they can make plays against unbalanced offenses when they force them to shift.
The issues the Sixers have is that they're deficient at areas that are critical to playing basketball at the NBA level. That's what happens when you spend two top picks (three if you count that we had to trade to get the top pick) on Ben and Fultz, neither of whom are playing.
Embiid would unironically be better off with Jokic's roster (and that says nothing about what might happen if/when Murray and MPJ return). Monte Morris, Will Barton, and Aaron Gordon can at least make entry passes. Everyone on the Sixers are either bad passers (Tobi), too small (Curry and Maxey) to throw it over the top of the defense, or someone you don't want to touch the ball more than 2 seconds a time (Danny and Matisse).
As for all this Jokic is better talk, let me know when Jokic isn't posting negative net ratings in the playoffs and starts winning at anywhere near the same rate as Embiid.
This year:
Jokic 16-12 (.571) when he plays
Embiid 15-8 (.652) when he plays
Last year:
Jokic 47-25 (.653) when he plays
Embiid 39-12 (.765) when he plays