Flash4thewin wrote:Tor_Raps wrote:kuclas wrote:
Vince had 2.5 years when he was traded from a poorly performing raptors team.
Again this is unprecedented a player of Simmons contract length (4 years) and team coming off 1 seed and competing has a player demanded out.
Never has ever happen before. Ever
Usually it’s on friendly terms (Paul George to Clippers) but those guys didn’t cut off contact with their prospective teams and refused to show up.
Simmons team (klutch) just has not gone around this the right way. If he had shown up. Played 10-15 games. Put up his usual 16/8/8 ben would have been long gone by now.
Rather he sits at home trying to plot out the next mental health evaluation bogus zoom calls he’s got to make in between his call of duty video games.
I'd say the difference between 2.5 and 4 years is semantics. Both are locked in what most consider longterm.
Agreed that if Simmons played then he probably would have been traded by now. But that would have came at the expense of the team he will be going to so that really wouldn't be in his interest either. I guess we'll find out how it ends.
2.5 to 4 year is semantics in what universe? You have to be trolling to make that statement.
2.5 to 3.5 is semantics, yes. There's a reason why teams aren't lining up for a guy who has proven to be a playoff failure as the 2nd option. Some are even considering Simmons overpaid because he doesn't look like he can be the 1st or 2nd best player on a championship team. That wouldn't make 3.5 more years at a max salary such a great deal.