Los_29 wrote:Remember when TwO claimed the Lakers winning a championship last year was a successful tank job despite the fact they signed arguably the 2nd best player of all-time? A better example would be to look at the New Orleans Pelicans who inherited all of the Laker's lottery picks and see how they have done. It's been a complete and utter disaster and are destined for a top 5 pick this year. I quite enjoy all these failed examples of tanks. I wonder what the next gem will be.
Now TwO is having a meltdown and are accusing people of having burner accounts again.
And it appears as though a certain poster is still rolling with that illogical, nonsensical argument about looking at number of voters. The fact he doesn't understand that a thread about tanking would generally attract more posters that are in favour of tanking than against tanking is hilarious. In addition, the poll was so bad for about two weeks that most people didn't even bother voting, including myself and posters actually referenced how bad the poll was a few weeks ago. Lastly, the majority of people in this thread wanted Jalen Green and Jalen Suggs and wanted nothing to do with Scottie prior to the draft. Considering how often TwO has been wrong, it's probably not wise to use consensus as an argument.
I like to follow a strategy that has been proven to build championships and is one that the best executives in the league use including ours. The strategy that you guys want was attempted about 10 years ago and the person who did it is now in another sport because it was such a disaster. He literally was so bad that he had to switch sports.
Didn’t the Cavs tank and draft kyrie number 1 and win a title?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



















