MickeyDavis wrote:There's no downside to expanded playoffs. Could 1/8, 2/7 be blowouts? Of course. So what? We had 2 blowouts last night. But you'd have a couple of extra bowl games with at least some meaning. This afternoon we have Fiesta and Sugar Bowls that are 100% meaningless. There is no downside to expanded playoffs.
Giving 4 or 5 teams that don't deserve a shot at the national title based on their regular season resume is a huge downside in my book. All that matters is giving the two teams with the best resume a chance to compete for the title, and since sometimes 3 or 4 teams can make a case, 4 is the right number, but I don't think there's ever been a time where the #5 team could make a case that they had a top-2 resume. I want the regular season to continue to have playoff urgency, and letting 2-3 loss teams like Texas A&M play for the title would diminish that. I wouldn't even consider them the true champion if they had a fluke win over an undefeated Power 5 team in the title game if that happened. The regular season already is a tournament. It's good the way it is.
I don't think the other bowls are meaningless at all. That's an optional mentality and the national title obsession is a media fabrication. Heck, the national championship itself was nothing but a media creation for about a century.
I never cared one iota less about the Badgers competing for Big Ten titles or Rose Bowl championships just because they weren't national title contenders, and I'm not one iota more interested in CFP games just because they're "national championship" games when there were already 2 or 3 bowl games with national championship implications before the CFP (and BCS games for that matter) even existed.
Wut we've got here is... faaailure... to communakate.