oldncreaky wrote:MasterIchiro wrote:Scoot McGroot wrote:
You’re right. As an Indy fan, we wouldn’t have any idea of what a small market team has to do to build.
But yeah. Maybe you could get Mitchell for the MLE in the offseason. That would be a relatively cheap move. But y’all have been trying to fix that center spot for awhile now on the cheap, and it still hasn’t worked. And Mitchell is still a terribly flawed player. But that could possibly happen. If you’re willing to leave the center spot as is for another half a season and potentially a playoffs appearance.
I guarantee Hornets get sent to slaughter this playoffs with Plumlee. And yes, I'm resigned to the strong possibility the Hornets target a role player at the 5 rather than paying a premium. Given our top tier offense, we'd be concentrating on the value of the things Robinson does well, like rebounding and paint protection. With LaMelo being such an exquisite playmaker, we can get away with an offense playing 4-on-5. We have solid secondary playmakers in Rozier, Hayward and recently Miles Bridges. I'm willing to bump up compensation for a glorified role player like Bamba for the added spacing. But I don't think the 5 will be a top salary slot for us. And I don't think a small market team should allot a top salary slot for a 5. The Jazz have Gobert but they also have Donovan Mitchell, but even their ceiling is limited. Nuggets have Murray with Jokic and their ceiling is limited. I think our roster is well balanced for a small market team, and I've given up on top tier targets like Sabonis and Turner. I'm looking hard at Mitchell Robinson, Mo Bamba (he's my first choice), Nurkic, Val and Harrell. Maybe Noel.
I strongly agree with this point -- spending on a C is the last thing a small market team should do. It is a luxury that doesn't make sense for a tax-averse team unless they are contending at that time. The game has changed and continue to evolve away from the basket and towards the 3pt line -- and that's where the salary space should be focused as well.
(aside: really enjoyed your posts in this thread detailing your thoughts on the Hornets C position -- well thought out and explained)
I appreciate it. I feel like sometimes topics create a tug-of-war that dismisses nuances that affect different teams in different situations subject to different market conditions. We shouldn't be bogged down in the argument of whether you need a top center to win or not. You need good players at every position. We can all agree on that. But the role of the 5 has been worn down to the studs in today's game. If there's one position where you can get away with less skill, it's the 5. And as a small market team you have to identify these efficiencies and execute your plan accordingly. Athleticism becomes a standard crutch at the 5. It matters at the 5 big time in today's game (Jokic is the exception). Someone like Jarrett Allen satisfies everyone involved in the conversation. He makes 20 million. He can be your third highest salary if his supporting cast is freaking perfect for him (they are). He doesn't shoot threes but he also doesn't bark for the ball in the paint like Patrick Ewing and the Cavs don't rely on paint offense. Jarrett Allen is what happens when you take a raw athlete who's a hard worker and everything works out for him. I guess this is my way of saying Allen is the high end of what I'd allot to the 5 as a small market team. I have Sabonis and Turner blowing past that. We had to trade a future pick for Kai Jones and hope in three years he becomes a glorified role player. Turner hates that label (and the money that comes with it). I think Kai Jones would embrace it. In the meantime we get by with Mason Plumlee. Yes, we will lose. Yes, in the first round. But he doesn't stunt the development of the roster. Internal improvements are the currency of a well managed small market team.