DCZards wrote:Dark Faze wrote:Wasn't a fan of the Dinwiddie signing when it happened. To me it was obvious that you should run Brad at the 1 next to KCP, Kuz, Rui, Gaff. See how that goes for the first half of the season and if you're desperate for a PG then start making some moves. Now here we go again with a chunk of cap space in the toilet and likely few takers for dudes contract.
I’m not in favor of asking Beal to play PG. It’s alright in an emergency, short-term situation but not for an extended period of time. Beal at PG doesn’t play to his strengths as a shooter and scorer—and it exposes his weaknesses as a ball handler.
On top of that, it’s physically taxing to be both the PG and pretty much the sole scoring threat from the backcourt. I can see it wearing BB down to the point that he’s far less effective in the 4th quarter
I think we should give the Beal-Dinwiddie pairing more time to gel.
Agreed. People are talking about Dinwiddie as if he is a total bust. Dinwiddie has been hot and cold, but he is coming back from an ACL injury and adapting to a role of being a co lead guard rather than a dominant PG. Give him some time to figure things out. The Dinwiddie pre ACL injury was a really good player. It's far too soon to assume that guy no longer exists.