JujitsuFlip wrote:If it comes down to Garland and the Cavs are fighting for home court advantage versus FVV and the Raps are fighting for a back half play-in spot... There is zero doubt in my mind Garland is the clear cut choice, especially since the game is in Cleveland.ForeverTFC wrote:JujitsuFlip wrote:I would say Trae is a lock as a starter, both LaVine and DDR deserve to be in, as starters or otherwise. Harden most likely is in, regardless who selects him.
From there its up to 1 or 2 wild card spots and will probably go to guys like Garland, Holiday, Ball, Beal (lifetime achievement award), and potentially Brown depending where the Celtics record is by the time coaches cast their ballots for the reserves.
Agree that Trae, DDR, Lavine and Harden are in. Holiday will also be in as Milwaukee deserves 2 all-stars and he's more deserving than Middleton.
So 1 spot left. FVV has been better than Garland, Beal, Ball and the Celtics don't deserve 2 all-stars (Tatum will get in). Again, there is no narrative that "this is not a discussion". He's very much in the running and in my opinion doesn't get in if:
- Coaches/leage give Beal his lifetime achievement award even though he doesn't deserve it this year
- Coaches/league bring in Lamelo for TV/fan purposes even though FVV has been better
- Coaches/league want to perpetuate the Boston myth with 2 all-stars even though Brown and the Celtics don't deserve 2 all-stars
If you're going by play and impact this year, FVV is an all-star in that last spot.
If that's how you decide, then Kyle Lowry probably has a better claim to the spot than Garland. Miami has a better record, has had way more injuries to deal with to their star players Butler and Bam, and Lowry is the constant on that team through all of this.
Look, I'm not saying Garland doesn't deserve it. He's been great this year. But from an individual standpoint, there is no way you can say he's been better than FVV. My pushback was to your initial point that there are way more players deserving of the spot and implying he shouldn't be in the conversation. Given our back and forth, I think you'd cede that it's a lot closer than your initial take implied, no?





















