Game Thread – Spurs (14-22) @ Celtics (18-19) – 7:30PM, Wed, Jan. 5, 2022

bucknersrevenge · Post #181 » by **bucknersrevenge** » Thu Jan 6, 2022 1:27 am

Is it weird that I'm more surprised when Dennis makes a 3 than Marcus despite the percentages?

radcot · Post #182 » by **radcot** » Thu Jan 6, 2022 1:27 am

Fencer reregistered wrote:Does the word "aggressiveness" serve any purpose that "aggression" wouldn't also fulfil?

"aggression" has a more negative connotation?

Celts17Pride · Post #183 » by **Celts17Pride** » Thu Jan 6, 2022 1:28 am

NBA is so weak

Post #184 » by **Parliament10** » Thu Jan 6, 2022 1:28 am

Mike Gorman doesn't seem to like Chris Mannix so much.

Fencer reregistered · Post #185 » by **Fencer reregistered** » Thu Jan 6, 2022 1:28 am

Parliament10 wrote:Reviewing for a Flagrant???

That was a LONG step from Marcus into the foul. Probably that's why there's a flagrant review.

BostonCouchGM · Post #186 » by **BostonCouchGM** » Thu Jan 6, 2022 1:29 am

Such a dumb foul. And people voted him having high BBIQ?

PierceFan4ever · Post #187 » by **PierceFan4ever** » Thu Jan 6, 2022 1:29 am

I think I’m over the Dennis experiment. He just doesn’t fit

Spurs are so damn annoying to play against

Fencer reregistered · Post #188 » by **Fencer reregistered** » Thu Jan 6, 2022 1:29 am

"Dangerous closeout" -- I'm sorry, but I kind of agree. Still, I wish they'd called it differently.

Post #189 » by **Shak_Celts** » Thu Jan 6, 2022 1:30 am

come on now get a real shot.

Celts17Pride · Post #190 » by **Celts17Pride** » Thu Jan 6, 2022 1:30 am

Not a good shot by Brown

Infinite Llamas · Post #191 » by **Infinite Llamas** » Thu Jan 6, 2022 1:30 am

They’ll call that flagrant every time. Forbes has to move his feet to land. Too strong a close out

Fencer reregistered · Post #192 » by **Fencer reregistered** » Thu Jan 6, 2022 1:30 am

Parliament10 wrote:Mike Gorman doesn't seem to like Chris Mannix so much.

Which reminds me that somehow Scal has changed his shtick substantially, so that he now has decent chemistry sith Mike.

Post #193 » by **Shak_Celts** » Thu Jan 6, 2022 1:31 am

keep going in there

Fencer reregistered · Post #194 » by **Fencer reregistered** » Thu Jan 6, 2022 1:31 am

To be clear, NOT having decent chemistry with Mike Gorman is damning for the other guy.

Larry_Russell · Post #195 » by **Larry_Russell** » Thu Jan 6, 2022 1:31 am

Im not one to complain alot about refs, but that was shockingly bad

Post #196 » by **Shak_Celts** » Thu Jan 6, 2022 1:32 am

ugh jb who was that for?

Larry_Russell · Post #197 » by **Larry_Russell** » Thu Jan 6, 2022 1:32 am

Celts17Pride wrote:Not a good shot by Brown

I am ok with a couple of those a game from brown and tatum.

radcot · Post #198 » by **radcot** » Thu Jan 6, 2022 1:32 am

Fencer reregistered wrote:
Parliament10 wrote:Mike Gorman doesn't seem to like Chris Mannix so much.

Which reminds me that somehow Scal has changed his shtick substantially, so that he now has decent chemistry sith Mike.

I'm not missing Scal one bit.I think his shtick is wearing thin.

Post #199 » by **Shak_Celts** » Thu Jan 6, 2022 1:32 am

come on!!!

radcot · Post #200 » by **radcot** » Thu Jan 6, 2022 1:33 am

JT for 3!!!!